GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2013, 17:05   #1
nuclear g17
Senior Member
 
nuclear g17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: nc
Posts: 265
British Army goes Glock

British Army buys 25,000 Gen4 G17 Pistols. Glock is 500,000 guns behind and has 875,000 mags on back order. Many new contracts overseas.


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...ock-17-1528571
nuclear g17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 17:19   #2
tonyparson
Senior Member
 
tonyparson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dayton, TN.
Posts: 5,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuclear g17 View Post
British Army buys 25,000 Gen4 G17 Pistols. Glock is 500,000 guns behind and has 875,000 mags on back order. Many new contracts overseas.


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...ock-17-1528571
Where did you get your numbers about Glock being 875,000 mags on back order and 500,000 guns behind??
__________________
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.......
Thomas Jefferson
tonyparson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 17:31   #3
AustinTx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tx
Posts: 8,071
I thought this was yesterday?
AustinTx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 17:33   #4
nuclear g17
Senior Member
 
nuclear g17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: nc
Posts: 265
I just went to the factory. That is how far they are behind.
nuclear g17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 17:40   #5
HGxyz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,250
Maybe that's why the G32 I ordered in February arrived in December.
HGxyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 17:49   #6
UKarmr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Well I don't know about your side of the pond, but we are expecting delivery of all of them prior to April. The initial 2000 for train the trainer & maintainer courses arrived in Dec
UKarmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 19:19   #7
unit1069
Senior Member
 
unit1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Central US
Posts: 8,759
I stopped reading after the first paragraph.

What exactly is it that makes a Glock G-17 "more deadly" than the Browning Hi Power?
__________________
Rocket Scientist
unit1069 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 19:45   #8
jeremy1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Armed In Alberta
Posts: 1,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by unit1069 View Post
I stopped reading after the first paragraph.

What exactly is it that makes a Glock G-17 "more deadly" than the Browning Hi Power?

So true. I love my Glocks but that is some media hype to say that it is more deadly. A better capacity and lighter weight is about it. On my last tour most of the Brits I met had newer mark III's. still a fine pistol
__________________
G17 gen 1, G19, G20 OD, G22 gen 4, G37 and lots of other Non Glocks
jeremy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 19:52   #9
FLAHOTROD
Senior Member
 
FLAHOTROD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 418
That's the same kind of thinking that makes an"assault rifle" more dangerous than any other type of rifle. Just plain and simple ignorance.
__________________
I married my wife for her looks. Just not the ones she gives me when I bring home a new gun.

Florida Glocker #112, S&W #112, Ruger #112a, Rimfire #112, SNS #112
FLAHOTROD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 19:56   #10
unit1069
Senior Member
 
unit1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Central US
Posts: 8,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy1 View Post
So true. I love my Glocks but that is some media hype to say that it is more deadly. A better capacity and lighter weight is about it. On my last tour most of the Brits I met had newer mark III's. still a fine pistol
Yes, a "progressive" media blitz to demonize firearms, especially any high-capacity handgun or rifle. Funny how the Browning escaped the politically-correct "10-round minimum" jihad currently underway, but then editors understand how to manipulate public opinion given that the MI-5 invented the push poll in 1940.

I do think like you the G-17 may be an improvement insofar as capacity and weight but as far as "deadly", well ... , ... that's just nonsense.
__________________
Rocket Scientist
unit1069 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 20:05   #11
im413
Member
 
im413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 87
Maybe this why I can't find a G17 Mag to save my soul.

posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
Semper Fi
im413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 21:45   #12
M 7
Senior Member
 
M 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuclear g17 View Post
Glock is 500,000 guns behind and has 875,000 mags on back order.
Glock personnel told you this? Whoa.
__________________
For those who CCW:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
M 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 21:57   #13
tcallre
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SW US
Posts: 16
Makes good sense. The GP35 is well beyond it's life, needs expensive maintenance and is due for replacement. The G17 is rugged, light weight, proven design, easy to train on, combat accurate, and even though the Brits may pay a pretty penny for them, economical. This platform should last them a long time. If I were king this is the choice I'd make.

Last edited by tcallre; 01-13-2013 at 21:57..
tcallre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 23:24   #14
G36_Me
Senior Member
 
G36_Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 963
If this is true, then a good choice.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member, NSSF member, GSSF Lifetime
- previous competitive shooter
Advanced Glock Armorer
Glock Professional Instructor
NRA Certified Pistol Instructor
G36_Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 00:59   #15
ChrisJn
"Old Bill"
 
ChrisJn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Baldwin Co, Alabama
Posts: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuclear g17 View Post
British Army buys 25,000 Gen4 G17 Pistols.........

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...ock-17-1528571
For 9,000,000.
At current exchange rates that is $576 per pistol! Poor British tax payer ripped off again.
Just to let my fellow Brits know, LE and Military here in USA can buy them for $399 as an individual
__________________
"The United Kingdom and the United States are two great nations but separated by a common language" - George Bernard Shaw
"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul" - George B Shaw
Certified Glock Armorer
ChrisJn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:00   #16
UKarmr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by unit1069 View Post
I stopped reading after the first paragraph.

What exactly is it that makes a Glock G-17 "more deadly" than the Browning Hi Power?
The paper quoted isn't exactly high brow reading....
There was a trial process that included
Sig P226
Glock gen 3 (possibly why one poster saw them in use)
Glock gen 4
Beretta PX
Brownings current Version
Steyr M9
S&W M&P
HK P30

The Gen 4 won the trial outright.
UKarmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:03   #17
UKarmr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisJn View Post
For 9,000,000.
At current exchange rates that is $576 per pistol! Poor British tax payer ripped off again.
Just to let my fellow Brits know, LE and Military here in USA can buy them for $399 as an individual
That figure isn't just the purchase price, it includes initial training package, spares package, ancillaries such as spare magazines, cleaning kits, holsters etc
UKarmr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:11   #18
bigred0383
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 97
There was another article about this that said they made the switch because they felt the Browning's were not as reliable as they used to be.

Riiiiiight.
bigred0383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:24   #19
ChrisJn
"Old Bill"
 
ChrisJn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Baldwin Co, Alabama
Posts: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred0383 View Post
There was another article about this that said they made the switch because they felt the Browning's were not as reliable as they used to be.

Riiiiiight.
Hey, nothing wrong with the Browning but have to admit old technology compared to Glock
__________________
"The United Kingdom and the United States are two great nations but separated by a common language" - George Bernard Shaw
"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul" - George B Shaw
Certified Glock Armorer
ChrisJn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:33   #20
bigred0383
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisJn View Post
Hey, nothing wrong with the Browning but have to admit old technology compared to Glock
I am sure it's an a great think from an armorer's standpoint. Repairs, inventory, etc.

Great from a training standpoint as well.

But come on, after no major design changes in what...50 years (when they went to an external extractor), all of a sudden BHP's became unreliable?

Just be honest, for ease of use and cost savings its a no brainer, so why oversell it?
bigred0383 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:49.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,017
326 Members
691 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31