Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2013, 14:11   #41
Senior Member
VinnieD's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,201
Their quality control seems to be hit or miss. Every so often I hear about someone getting a bad one, often even after being sent back they still break down. I hear it far too often to trust them. If not checking them for quality is how Taurus gets their prices down, I'd rather pay more for one that works. For that matter Taurus doesn't even have the lowest prices for budget guns, so I don't see the draw there either.
"Use more gun." -The Engineer- (Team Fortress 2)

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
VinnieD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 15:10   #42
nathanours's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Born in Texas, now in Colorado
Posts: 3,360
My father owns a Taurus Judge which I have much experience with. I would never buy a Taurus firearm after handling and shooting it. It feels cheaply made, and the fit and finish is very poor. It is one of the black models and the bluing feels like some sort of easily chipped, cheap black lacquer. The trigger is horrible and gritty, while all the machining is very poorly done. The checkering on the hammer, for example, is uneven in height. The accuracy is poor as well. That said, if you had to use it to defend yourself at 7 yards, it would work.

It's completely a matter of personal preference, but the names of many Taurus revolvers bug me as well. The names "The Judge" and "Raging Bull" seem much better suited to be plastered on the side of an 8 year old's toy than a firearm. It doesn't make matters better when they make these model names as large in a most obnoxious location.
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Black Rifle Club #1989
nathanours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 15:46   #43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA/Covered by LEOSA
Posts: 12,320
All the ones ive owned and or shot(and know the current owners) have ALL worked 100% this includes the

PT99(adjustable sight version of the PT92 loved it has been the only gun that the entire time I owned it never failed in any way)

Currently have a CH85 Revolver works great good snubby.

have shot in the last year

PT145(works great never malfunctioned(after i told the guy when it was malfunctioning that he actually had to clean it B4 he shot it..he had no idea..once he cleaned it up its run 100% I actually think this may very well be my next gun)

709 Slim(ran 100% guy moved but b4 he moved id shot around 100 rounds through it and he a lot more and never a problem...he used it as his primary CC weapon)

The small taurus .380..the newer one that I cant think of the name of..actually real nice..once the guy ran about a box and a half through it its run 100% ever since..I DID have some issues during the first box and they have ALL GONE AWAY since the box and a half mark. IF I were to get a .380 this is the one id get.
CBennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 16:19   #44
Senior Member
wingspar's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 791
The bad reputation Taurus used to have still resonates with those that have had bad experiences with Taurus, and those that have read about the bad experiences. Taurus has come a long way. I bought a PT-1911 a couple of months ago and have over 700 rounds thru it with no issues. Wasn’t my first choice, but the LGS (Small store) keeps them in stock and the price was right, so I decided to give it a shot. I have not been disappointed.

Look for hickock45 on YouTube. He is very well respected for his views and has at least 3 videos on a Taurus revolver.
Will Fly for Food... and more Ammo
wingspar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 19:03   #45
Jade Falcon
Jade Falcon's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA.
Posts: 5,497
I went to the gun show a couple months ago and handled a Taurus snubbie, ported, in .41 Magnum. It was a beautiful little thing, that fit my hand without much trouble. It held 5 shots. It was used, and I've forgotten what model number it was. But I really liked it! Not bad price either for $430-something, if I remember correctly.
AK-47 WASR 10/63, Puma M92 16" .454 Casull, Glock 22 .40 S&W, Marlin M60W .22 LR, Ruger GP100 4" .357 Magnum, Winchester M1400 12 ga.
Jade Falcon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 05:56   #46
Senior Member
silversport's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicagoland USA
Posts: 3,128

My PT1911 AL has been a nice purchase with no issues that weren't of my own doing...I changed the recoil spring to an ISMI of the same 16lb. spec (I do this for all my 1911 pattern pistols)...

I think you need to check when making any custom touches just as you might with other pistols of this pattern like grip panels...I've read Raasco stocks are fine...as some of my stocks bind a bit with Taurus' ambi-safety...

I wanted to try an aluminum framed 1911 type pistol and the price was right and mine has not disappointed...I read that prices aren't the screaming deals they once were but I'd make my purchase again if the price combo was right...

****G17**G21 Gen4**G26 Gen4**G30S****
*Like What You've Got?...Thank a Vet!*
silversport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 12:32   #47
Senior Member
SargeMO's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 626
Buying a Taurus like grabbing a treat from Forrest Gump's 'Box o' Chocolates'- you never know what you're gonna get.

I traded for my first Taurus awhile back, a late model PT145. Taurus has a well-deserved reputation for spotty quality control, which manifested itself in the first 20 rounds from this gun. One of the magazines was, politely put, a piece of crap. Luckily, the the dealer had another PT145 on hand and he swapped me out a good mag PDQ. With good magazines, pistol is reliable and it isn't picky about bullet profile. It fed my .45 ACP, 230 lead flat-point reloads slick as a whistle. Early shooting indicates it will keep a magazine on your head at 20 paces. Later shooting revealed that I shoot it just as well as my issue Glock 22, even at 25 yards. I do find the grip of the Millenniums to be on the small side for my hands, and a grip sleeve like this Houge made a noticeable improvement in my unsupported shooting.

General Firearms Forum

I've had a couple if chances to break even on it already but I can't bring myself to do it, It's just the right size, shoots my favorite cartridge... rest of the story here if anyone's interested.

PS... those guys at TaurusArmed are a hoot, some cheerleadin' mofos! They do seem to realize that poorer examples of their pistol just flat suck.
N. 1. An argument characterized by excessive retardation.
2. A augment between two retards.
Internet Discussion Forums are a hotbed of Retargument.
SargeMO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 12:40   #48
Senior Member
johnstein11's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 502
Well, if you have one, you can always say "at least it's not a diamondback!"

johnstein11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2013, 13:34   #49
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West Georgia
Posts: 1,731
I have a Taurus Tracker .41 magnum that my dad bought me twelve years ago,never had a problem out of it.

The only other Taurus I have is a Rossi/Taurus Circuit Judge
that I bought on a whim.So far no problems after about 300 rds. with it.

While I prefer Ruger or S&W,Taurus has some products the niether of the former offer like the Tracker.

I wouldn't hesitate to buy one of their revolvers again.
Pawcatch@aol.co is online now   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:02.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 947
243 Members
704 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03