Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-16-2012, 11:23   #1
Aeroscoper
Senior Member
 
Aeroscoper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 1,600
Gun ban coming to a town near you....

Can anyone confirm or deny this? And please cite references, not emotionally driven dismissives such as " that could never happen", or such.

http://www.infowars.com/obama-seeks-...ontrol-treaty/
__________________
“I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire, … The man that controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire. And I control the money supply.” – Nathan Meyer Rothschild
Aeroscoper is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 11:37   #2
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
fastbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Within the lightning (Northern CA)
Posts: 9,750
Really?

You like to get your "news" from the folks who write for Conspiracy Planet & Occupy Corporatism?

Have you bothered to actually read the proposed UN treaty the many times links to it have been posted in various "the sky is falling" threads?
__________________
Sub Club #9; .40 S&W Club #1953; S&W Club #3913
Retired LE - firearms instructor/armorer
fastbolt is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 11:42   #3
Highspeedlane
NRA Life Member
 
Highspeedlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MA and N.C.
Posts: 3,580
The NRA-ILA webpage on that topic doesn't mention such details as are mentioned in the article, but I have every confidence it's entirely possible.

It's crucial we help elect a strong, pro-2A congress this November, or it's going to be a rough ride.
__________________
I'm a non-paid, non-attorney spokesman.
Highspeedlane is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 11:53   #4
cowboy1964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 15,051
Uh, this UN small arms treaty has been talked about for quite awhile now. What it's exact effects would be are a little murky but the treaty itself is nothing new or secretive. I don't think some of the points in the article are correct (like it "bans" semi-autos) but I could be wrong.

But regardless, it's not going to happen.

Last edited by cowboy1964; 06-16-2012 at 11:54..
cowboy1964 is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 11:54   #5
DonD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central TX
Posts: 4,225


According to the American Rifleman, another letter signed by some 57 Senators was sent to the Obozo administration warning it not to try to make any anti gun treaties with the UN.

We do need to remain vigilant and vote for pro 2nd Amendment Representatives, Senators, governors and judges but I do think there is a lot of distrust of the UN by a large majority of the US and not just on 2nd Amendment issues.

It's hard to view the UN as anything but a world wide platform for dictators and other third world scumbags to inflict their views on more civilized nations. Don
DonD is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:00   #6
WarEagle32
Senior Member
 
WarEagle32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Prattville, AL
Posts: 2,171
Seems like fairly biased and one sided news reporting to me!
WarEagle32 is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:00   #7
Aeroscoper
Senior Member
 
Aeroscoper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 1,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastbolt View Post
Really?

You like to get your "news" from the folks who write for Conspiracy Planet & Occupy Corporatism?

Have you bothered to actually read the proposed UN treaty the many times links to it have been posted in various "the sky is falling" threads?
Apparently you didn't see the portion of my post where I asked to refrain from "emotionally driven dismissives", or you don't know what that means.

Nevertheless, I like to get my information from anywhere there's something to be gained, and if I'm not sure of the veracity, I like to post it on sites where I trust the discernment level by certain inviduals.

If you don't have anything to constructive to add, with sources to cite, then don't complain when they come a knockin'.
__________________
“I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire, … The man that controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire. And I control the money supply.” – Nathan Meyer Rothschild
Aeroscoper is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:03   #8
Aeroscoper
Senior Member
 
Aeroscoper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 1,600
Here's a story from Forbes saying about the same thing, maybe coming from a more "reputable' site might lend some credibility to those suffering normalcy bias to a blinding degree:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybel...rs-up-in-arms/
__________________
“I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire, … The man that controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire. And I control the money supply.” – Nathan Meyer Rothschild
Aeroscoper is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:12   #9
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 7,785
Obama can sign a UN gun ban treaty all he wants - it has zero legal weight until ratified by congress, which will not happen.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
WoodenPlank is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:45   #10
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
fastbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Within the lightning (Northern CA)
Posts: 9,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeroscoper View Post
Apparently you didn't see the portion of my post where I asked to refrain from "emotionally driven dismissives", or you don't know what that means.
I didn't consider my response to be anything remotely resembling an "emotionally driven dismissive". I have neither an "emotional investment" in the topic, nor did I dismiss the topic itself.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeroscoper View Post
Nevertheless, I like to get my information from anywhere there's something to be gained, and if I'm not sure of the veracity, I like to post it on sites where I trust the discernment level by certain inviduals.
How do you decide whether there's "something to be gained" from any particular source? Some "news sources" might not have the veracity of the supermarket tabloids, you know.

Also, how do you determine the "discernment level" of anonymous folks who participate in internet forums? Sometimes shared hysteria, paranoia & promoting rumor-mongering may be less than helpful. Rumors fly faster than the speed of reason.

If you take the time to do some online research, you can find some info which might quell some of your anxieties. You might start with the NRA's info ...
http://www.nraila.org/legislation/fe...de-treaty.aspx

Notice the part about the "prepares to draft" for later this year?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeroscoper View Post
If you don't have anything to constructive to add, with sources to cite, then don't complain when they come a knockin'.
I've heard any number of folks stridently predicting "they're coming for our guns!!!" since I was a teenager after the gun control act in '68. After 40 years, it's palled a bit.

Granted, some of the fear-mongering being bandied about may provide some folks with a vicarious thrill (as can detailed discussions about preparing to repel an invasion by hostile non-terrestrial alien forces), but until some proposed treaty is finalized and the details are released, it's just another uptick in the last 40 years of periodic "the sky is falling" episodes.

I spent a career in LE, working in CA, but talking with cops from all over the US, and from some foreign countries.

Maybe we ought to wait and see if there's anything to get excited about before running to the bunkers?
__________________
Sub Club #9; .40 S&W Club #1953; S&W Club #3913
Retired LE - firearms instructor/armorer

Last edited by fastbolt; 06-16-2012 at 12:51..
fastbolt is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 12:53   #11
JBnTX
JB in Tx
 
JBnTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 14,595
Gun ban coming to a town near you....

No, it's not!
Not in Texas, not in a million years.
JBnTX is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 13:29   #12
janice6
Platinum Membership
NRA
 
janice6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: minnesota
Posts: 19,176


So nothing can happen until the Obama and the Democrat Senate approve it.

You don't see any problem with this possibility do you.
__________________
janice6

"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". Anonymous

Earp: Not everyone who knows you hates you.
DOC: I know it ain't always easy bein' my friend....but I'll BE THERE when you need me.
janice6 is online now  
Old 06-16-2012, 13:35   #13
pennlineman
Senior Member
 
pennlineman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 2,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBnTX View Post
Gun ban coming to a town near you....

No, it's not!
Not in Texas, not in a million years.
Just like the gun ban of 1994 didn't effect Texas.
pennlineman is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 14:03   #14
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
fastbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Within the lightning (Northern CA)
Posts: 9,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by janice6 View Post
So nothing can happen until the Obama and the Democrat Senate approve it.

You don't see any problem with this possibility do you.
As I'm looking 60 years of age in the face, I've come to find that looking for problems out on the horizon, over which I have no control, and which have yet to materialize in any concrete form, can sometimes make me miss the ones right in front of me.
__________________
Sub Club #9; .40 S&W Club #1953; S&W Club #3913
Retired LE - firearms instructor/armorer
fastbolt is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 14:53   #15
captdreifus
aSun666
 
captdreifus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by pennlineman View Post
Just like the gun ban of 1994 didn't effect Texas.
Zing!!!!!
__________________
"I dont believe in an eye for an eye..I believe in two eyes for an eye" Bas Rutten
captdreifus is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 15:10   #16
poodleplumber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,080
(1) The US has not signed the treaty.
(2) The treaty regulates international shipment of firearms, not possession of arms by private parties.
(3) Even a signed treaty has to be ratified, which will generate a huge amount of public debate.
(4) Treaties cannot supersede the US Constitution even if ratified. The Supreme Court has spoken clearly on this in Reid v Covert.

Try snopes.com?

Last edited by poodleplumber; 06-16-2012 at 15:10..
poodleplumber is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 15:19   #17
HexHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodenPlank View Post
Obama can sign a UN gun ban treaty all he wants - it has zero legal weight until ratified by congress, which will not happen.
Treaties only have to be ratified by the Senate, and don't be so cocky about what a lame duck Senate filled with bitter defeated Dems might do after the election.
HexHead is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 15:21   #18
janice6
Platinum Membership
NRA
 
janice6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: minnesota
Posts: 19,176


Quote:
Originally Posted by fastbolt View Post
As I'm looking 60 years of age in the face, I've come to find that looking for problems out on the horizon, over which I have no control, and which have yet to materialize in any concrete form, can sometimes make me miss the ones right in front of me.


I'm 73 and I've learned to ignore the possible worst case make you more eligible for it.
__________________
janice6

"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". Anonymous

Earp: Not everyone who knows you hates you.
DOC: I know it ain't always easy bein' my friend....but I'll BE THERE when you need me.
janice6 is online now  
Old 06-16-2012, 15:56   #19
Philo Beddoe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 122
For anyone to deny that a gun ban or outright gun confiscation isn't possible, is to be naive and to ignore this nation's history.

I personally think we pro-gun/pro-2A folks are going about this in the wrong way. Rather than to hope and pray that the clown in the office doesn't find a workaround to thwart Congress and make guns illegal, 2 things would be more effective:

1. All LEOs should join and support Oathkeepers. and;
2. We as a community should draft a letter to Congress that lets them know in no uncertain terms that we consider our RTKBA to be one of the unalianable rights endowed by our Creator, and thus we will not recognize any legislation or UN treaty that attempts to take away that right.

Let Congress know that they can change the laws all they want, but unless they're willing to engage in some epic bloodshed, it aint happening!

Last edited by Philo Beddoe; 06-16-2012 at 15:58..
Philo Beddoe is offline  
Old 06-16-2012, 16:02   #20
Philo Beddoe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastbolt View Post

Maybe we ought to wait and see if there's anything to get excited about before running to the bunkers?
Isn't that a little like waiting for the intruder in your livingroom to actually pull his trigger before you decide if he's serious or not?
Philo Beddoe is offline  

 
  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:37.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,084
277 Members
807 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31