Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2012, 16:51   #161
Lone Wolf8634
:):
 
Lone Wolf8634's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Under the bus
Posts: 6,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post
That is is dispicable.
Cry me a river.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post
I like dogs, I have always owned dogs. But, I am not some yuppie city slicker who can't tell the difference between canine and human. animal and human.
Humans are animals.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post
Unlike you, I would gladly let my dog die, if it was a choice between saving a human life, or her life. It isn't that hard.
We've already established that we are nothing alike.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post
Oh, there are a lot of people I dislike in this life. Some of them are still alive because it is illegal and immoral to kill them. However, they still have more value than a dog.
The arrogance of the human animal never fails to amaze me.
__________________
"Before diagnosing yourself with depression or low self esteem, be sure that you are not, in fact, surrounded by A-holes." - William Gibson

"Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." - Homer Simpson
Lone Wolf8634 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:16   #162
Kingarthurhk
Isaiah 53:4-9
 
Kingarthurhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Wolf8634 View Post
Cry me a river.
Not crying, but astonished by weirdos.



Quote:
Humans are animals.
The other white meat?


Quote:
We've already established that we are nothing alike.
Which I am thanful for.



Quote:
The arrogance of the human animal never fails to amaze me.
Indeed, mixed with depravity and plain breathtaking foolishness.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 20SF, 21C, 22, 26, 27, Glock E-Tool, Glock knife
Quod ego haereticus appellari sequere Jesum.
Kingarthurhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:20   #163
Kingarthurhk
Isaiah 53:4-9
 
Kingarthurhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilrain View Post


How do you have any idea what they taught their son? You sure are a presumptuous cuss, I'll give you that.
If that value hadn't been taught, he wouldn't have risked his life for a dog.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 20SF, 21C, 22, 26, 27, Glock E-Tool, Glock knife
Quod ego haereticus appellari sequere Jesum.
Kingarthurhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:20   #164
Kingarthurhk
Isaiah 53:4-9
 
Kingarthurhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonestar 48 View Post
Well, I would definitely jump in the water to save two of my three dogs; the third one better wait a day or two before she goes swimming. She pee'd on the floor this morning.

If I saw a cat being carried out by the tide, I might toss some chum out just to see what happened!
The irony is, you would have died and they would have lived.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 20SF, 21C, 22, 26, 27, Glock E-Tool, Glock knife
Quod ego haereticus appellari sequere Jesum.
Kingarthurhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:20   #165
Goat 36
Senior Member
 
Goat 36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Glockerbie
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by GWSHARK View Post
Would anyone kill a human to save their dog?
The interesting thing about this question, to me, is that, if I'm not mistaken, you would be completely within your legal rights to shoot and/or kill somebody who was attempting to harm/kill your dog.

What does this say about society's acceptance of dogs as family members?

And I, myself, would not hesitate.

Wallet, vehicle, etc.-I'd simply hand it over if they got the drop on me.

If they tried to harm or 'take' my dog?

"Here we go!!"

I'd take my chances expecting some inevitable loss of blood, possibly broken bones or worse.
__________________
"...I see them long, hard times to come."

-Justified theme song.
Goat 36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:21   #166
Kingarthurhk
Isaiah 53:4-9
 
Kingarthurhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by OctoberRust View Post
Why whenever I log on to this, I see the same folks, generally the ones that are religious make illogical arguments, then I see DD and Falman come on and correct them?

Man, and I thought maybe times have changed for the couple weeks I haven't logged into glocktalk!
This has to do with stupidity, not religion.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 20SF, 21C, 22, 26, 27, Glock E-Tool, Glock knife
Quod ego haereticus appellari sequere Jesum.
Kingarthurhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:28   #167
TeeJay37
Senior Member
 
TeeJay37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goat 36 View Post
The interesting thing about this question, to me, is that, if I'm not mistaken, you would be completely within your legal rights to shoot and/or kill somebody who was attempting to harm/kill your dog.
I don't think this is correct in all areas. I'm pretty sure here(Louisiana) your dog is your "property" and you don't have a right to deadly force to protect it.
TeeJay37 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:34   #168
NeverMore1701
Platinum Membership
Fear no evil.
 
NeverMore1701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 32,134
Quote:
SUBCHAPTER D. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY

Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.
(b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property by another is justified in using force against the other when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor; or
(2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or fraud against the actor.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.


Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.

Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Someone tries to harm or take my pets, and it's on.
__________________
And if we should die tonight
We should all die together
Raise a glass of wine
For the last time
NeverMore1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:39   #169
md2lgyk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilrain View Post


You should seek psychological help.
That's your opinion. I respectfully disagree. And no, I don't need psychological help - those who assign human attributes to pets (i.e., furries) are the ones needing help.
__________________
"The great object is, that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun." - Patrick Henry
md2lgyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:43   #170
*ASH*
MEMBER OF 601
 
*ASH*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nc
Posts: 22,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeverMore1701 View Post
Someone tries to harm or take my pets, and it's on.
cuzz.......
*ASH* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 17:44   #171
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeeJay37 View Post
I don't think this is correct in all areas. I'm pretty sure here(Louisiana) your dog is your "property" and you don't have a right to deadly force to protect it.
You are wrong.

I many States you can.
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 18:28   #172
TeeJay37
Senior Member
 
TeeJay37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by countrygun View Post
You are wrong.

I many States you can.
Am I wrong about Louisiana? Or the entire statement?
TeeJay37 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 18:45   #173
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeeJay37 View Post
Am I wrong about Louisiana? Or the entire statement?
According to this site and their interpretation,

http://civilliberty.about.com/od/gun...a-Gun-Laws.htm





"Louisiana’s castle law permits the use of physical force to protect one’s self and property from “forcible crimes” and the use of deadly force in situations where circumstances are sufficient “to excite the fear of a reasonable person that there would be serious danger to his own life or person if he attempted to prevent the felony without the killing.” The statute has a “stand your ground” clause in that it does not require victims to retreat before using force, whether they’re inside their home or any other place they have a right to be."
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 19:05   #174
Kilrain
Señor Member
 
Kilrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the road to Shambala
Posts: 2,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post
If that value hadn't been taught, he wouldn't have risked his life for a dog.


Once again, a gigantic assumption that continues to make an ass out of you and.........well, you.
__________________
The hog of the forsaken,

He is the pork of crime

- Michael Hurley
Kilrain is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 19:08   #175
Kilrain
Señor Member
 
Kilrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the road to Shambala
Posts: 2,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by md2lgyk View Post
That's your opinion. I respectfully disagree. And no, I don't need psychological help - those who assign human attributes to pets (i.e., furries) are the ones needing help.


You're the one who wants to pay to shoot/kill domesticated dogs because you "hate" them. Pretty sure that aligns you with some of the most well known serial killers........good job!
__________________
The hog of the forsaken,

He is the pork of crime

- Michael Hurley

Last edited by Kilrain; 11-28-2012 at 19:09..
Kilrain is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 19:13   #176
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by md2lgyk View Post
Then you're a messed-up human being. We have no pets now, though used to have a cat or two in the past. They are animals, no more, no less. And I hate (HATE) dogs; would pay money to shoot them.
Oh well, who needs objectivity to render a useful opinion?

get Help Dude.
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 19:28   #177
Bren
NRA Life Member
 
Bren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 37,324
Quote:
Originally Posted by md2lgyk View Post
Then you're a messed-up human being. We have no pets now, though used to have a cat or two in the past. They are animals, no more, no less. And I hate (HATE) dogs; would pay money to shoot them.
I'd pay money to shoot people who'd pay money to shoot dogs...literally true. We all have our own point of view.
__________________
Quote:
This is the internet - you will never learn to shoot here.
- Me, 2014.
Bren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 19:32   #178
IndianaMatt
Senior Member
 
IndianaMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,548
Cheers

Last edited by IndianaMatt; 08-20-2014 at 10:27..
IndianaMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 19:36   #179
Annoyedgrunt
Dry Heat my ASS
 
Annoyedgrunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 5,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Critias View Post
You don't know a thing about this family, and the only scenario being created is the one you are making up in your own head. You imagine yourself as surrounded by no good city slicker yuppies, you put words in their mouths (while ignoring their arguments), and you've decided -- on your own, in you imagination -- how this tragedy went down. People have explained to you again and again how this family didn't die trying to save a dog, and you've ignored them with all the maturity and intellect of a four year old covering their ears and shouting "LA LA LA I can't hear you."

You're the only one who's insisted this family raised their children to believe a dog is as valuable as a human. If that's how they raise their kids, why didn't the daughter jump in, too? If that's how they raise their kids, why did the son give up on saving their dog? If the family believes dogs are worth as much as humans, why didn't they all jump in when the doggie hit the water?

The plain truth is that they didn't. A 16 year old boy, somewhat impetuously (as we expect from 16 year old boys) lost something in the water that was precious to him, and decided to jump in after it. That's what 16 year old boys do, they make poor decisions on the spur of the moment. It doesn't matter that it was a dog. It could have been an expensive pair of sunglasses, it could have been a set of keys on a floatie keyring, hell, the kid might have been dared to go for a swim (because, again, that's what teenagers do).

Everything that happened after that -- everything -- wasn't about a dog or about those kids being raised poorly, it was about a family that loved each other and tried to save one another from dangerous waters. And that? That is nobility. "Greater love hath no man," ringing any bells?

It's pretty execrable, twisting what happened and insulting their memory this way, just to start an argument on the internet.


Yeah. You would pay money to shoot dogs, and the other guy is a messed up human being? You've got a few wires crossed, buddy.


This is a family that died leaping into the ocean to try and save one another, and you're doing to sully it with something so crass and banal as that, to try and earn a few internet tough guy points? Shame on you. Plain and simple: shame.

And to those who insist an animal isn't worth another human being's life -- any human being's life -- with such absolution? Bullcrap. How many of you also insist you'd use lethal force on someone who was trying to rob you (so that a wallet is worth someone's life)? How many of you also say you'd use lethal force on a stranger in your house (so that your sense of fear, but mostly your property rights, are worth someone's life)? There are lots of things society decides are worth a human being's life, depending on the scenario. And if it's a human being freely choosing, of their own volition, to risk their life in order to save something precious to them -- why does it matter if that "something" is a dog? It's their life. They can try to save whoever, or whatever, they want with it.
This deserves a repost. Crit, it's good to see you in the lounge again, it's been a while. And with threads like this, it's no wonder you've been absent.

__________________
Quote:
That's true. Because those with very high IQs are often found on the general BS section of gun forums, stating as much to those who will listen.
Annoyedgrunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012, 19:41   #180
ray9898
Senior Member
 
ray9898's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 18,022


What a strage take on this event. First, how do you conclude they equated the dog with a human? Second, how to you make the jump they knew jumping in the water was life threatening? The teen getting into crisis in the water is when the severity of the situation became apparent, the family then perished trying to save each other.
ray9898 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:36.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 898
291 Members
607 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31