GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2012, 19:08   #41
Roering
Sorting nuts
 
Roering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,570
Go with the Mossberg 590A1 that holds 8+1.

You'll thank me.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------
Warranty voiding

Never buy vegan tacos from a chick with longer armpit hair than yourself. - Woofie
Roering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 12:57   #42
Landmonster
Senior Member
 
Landmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,039
Currently, I'm leaning towards the Mossberg 590a1 based on:

Parkerized finish
8+1 capacity
Better sights
Better ergonomics of controls
Landmonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 13:00   #43
Landmonster
Senior Member
 
Landmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bird View Post
Just save yourself the trouble and angst and buy a Benelli M2 or M4 if you can swing the dough.
Not to open a huge can of worms....

but ...
  1. What makes a Benelli a better choice for home-defense than either of these 2 guns?
  2. Is semi-auto really a more prudent choice than a pump-action shotgun for home-defense?
Landmonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 13:37   #44
FullClip
CLM Number 171
NRA Benefactor
 
FullClip's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On The Lake in The Maine Woods
Posts: 6,304


It's like asking if chocolate is better than vanilla.

For me, I go with the Mossberg, mostly because of the tang safety. I've shot a lot of skeet and trap with Red Labels that have the tang safety, so it's a reflex action for me to thumb the safety off on the way up to the shoulder. The cross bolt deal with the Remington is tough for me to get used to, just like the one on my Benelli Super-Nova that will be going on sale when I get home. Nice gun, but just not for me and I've already "replaced" it with a 590.
__________________
Si vos non planto is melior , utique planto diversus.
FullClip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 14:04   #45
mixflip
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,762
2 cents from a person who used Mossbergs in the military and Remingtons as a police officer and as a person who owned both at home. And on a side note I also owned a both shotguns in semiauto. (Remington 1187 and a Mossberg 930SPX tactical)

A bad guy stopped by a shotgun will never know what killed him. Both are reliable, combat proven, devastating, versatile and intimidating.

Here is what I have figured out over the years...

Mossberg =
aluminum receiver, landing gear is also aluminum, nuff said.
ambidextrous tang safety
slide release behind the trigger guard
shell elevator bar retracts into the receiver when loading ammo
590 model has the infamous bayonet mount!

Remington =
steel receiver, nuff said.
traditional cross bar safety (non ambidextrous)
slide release is located in front of the trigger guard
spring loaded load gate that pushes back on your finger when loading

Everything else from here can be changed. furniture, sights, accessories, slings, finish etc etc.

I like both and I am proficient with both. That being said, both need alot of practice/training to be proficient under stress adrenaline and fear.

Malfunctions will often be operator error and not a failure of the shotgun. But they are man made machines and parts do break under hard use so train to fix the problem and always have a NY reload.

Personal preference? I lean a bit more towards the Mossberg for its ambi safety and retracting elevator bar. My fingers have been pinched pretty bad under stress with the 870 but thats more of an operator issue.

Last edited by mixflip; 11-30-2012 at 03:02..
mixflip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 19:07   #46
Veedubklown
Senior Member
 
Veedubklown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northwest AZ
Posts: 2,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landmonster View Post
Not to open a huge can of worms....

but ...
  1. What makes a Benelli a better choice for home-defense than either of these 2 guns?
  2. Is semi-auto really a more prudent choice than a pump-action shotgun for home-defense?
1.) I got nothin. Either way, it's cheaper, and bullet-proof. Both these guns are rock solid, all the time. I've seen em break, but it's always amazing.
2.) If you've tested and patterned your load to know it will always cycle in that gun when you need it, it's not a bad choice. Alot of them are also sensitive to your hold to cycle reliable. A pump, however, can easily be fired from any awkward position, and will cycle reliably with about any load your going to stick in it. I use a semi-auto for HD, it's what I have. I definitely wouldn't feel inadequate with a 500 or 870, at all.
__________________
I don't always rock out with my glock out, but when I do, it's all the way.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Veedubklown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 20:37   #47
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landmonster View Post
Not to open a huge can of worms....

but ...
  1. What makes a Benelli a better choice for home-defense than either of these 2 guns?
  2. Is semi-auto really a more prudent choice than a pump-action shotgun for home-defense?
Why is a semi-auto rifle superior to a pump action or lever action rifle for HD?

Prudent? Based on what criteria? Cost--certainly not. Awesome reliability, tough, super high quality firearm? Sure... Manual of arms is only slightly different than a pump. Not harder--just different. Easier to switch ammo too.
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012, 20:53   #48
Kilrain
Señor Member
 
Kilrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the road to Shambala
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bird View Post
Why is a semi-auto rifle superior to a pump action or lever action rifle for HD?

Prudent? Based on what criteria? Cost--certainly not. Awesome reliability, tough, super high quality firearm? Sure... Manual of arms is only slightly different than a pump. Not harder--just different. Easier to switch ammo too.
?

Your reply, while interesting, is a bit confusing. Can you clarify what you are saying or trying to say? I value most opinions and appreciate it.
__________________
The hog of the forsaken,

He is the pork of crime

- Michael Hurley
Kilrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 01:45   #49
Kilrain
Señor Member
 
Kilrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the road to Shambala
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixflip View Post
Remington =
steel receiver, nuff said.
traditional cross bar safety (non ambidextrous)
safety located in front of the trigger guard
spring loaded load gate that pushes back on your finger when loading
I think you mistyped. The Remington safety is behind the trigger guard, the slide release is in front.
__________________
The hog of the forsaken,

He is the pork of crime

- Michael Hurley
Kilrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 03:07   #50
mixflip
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilrain View Post
I think you mistyped. The Remington safety is behind the trigger guard, the slide release is in front.
Good catch. I did mess up. I fixed it now.

Additionally, for those who might be interested...I found that the Benelli SuperNova Tactical actually had some of the best of both worlds when it came to features.

It had some features of a Mossberg (retracting load gate) and a Remington (slide release forward of the trigger) and a Winchester 1300 (rotating 3 lug bolt head) and a durable polymer coating like a Glock mag.

Last edited by mixflip; 11-30-2012 at 03:08..
mixflip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 09:12   #51
aippi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aceman View Post
Anyone who says there is a definitive answer is either telling you their personal preferences, or they don't know both platforms. Gotta be a big boy and call this yourself.

I prefer Mossberg, but Remington is just as good. And, if we lived in a world without Mossberg, I'd be just as happy.

I do understand what you are saying though. I'll make this very interesting point if you want to take it to that level.

A Remington 7600 RIFLE is exactly like an 870 Shotgun, except of course it comes in flavors like .308, .30-06, .270, and if you find a 7600P model, in .223 and they accept AR mags.

Floated barrel, extremely accurate, fast follow-ups, and can keep your eye on another target. Excellent choice for deer. Or anything else...

How's that for manual of arms consolidation and gear interchangeability?
AR, 870, 7600 and 7600p
Perfect example of what the OP was wanting to do. Sad thing is the 7615 Patrol rifle was discontinued due to flat sales.. As Ace said it is an 870 but in rifle caliblers. This weapon was built for LEO who would then have the same weapons system in a long gun. The .223 takes AR mags but the .308 takes the 7600 mag.

Last time I was at the factory they offered to Certify us on the 7615 if we came to class early. I did. Have yet to see one being used or have one come in for work but I find it interesting that they offered the Armorers Certifcation for a Discontinued weapon. Makes me think it might be coming back.
__________________
J.D. McGuire, Owner
AI&P Tactical, LLC

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Remington LE Armorer
Mossberg LE Armorer
aippi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 13:16   #52
pmwglock19
Senior Member
 
pmwglock19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 495
When I was looking at buying a shotgun for 3 gun and HD , I tried the 870 and mossbergs. I shot both well but went to the mossberg 500 because of the safety. But either one would have worked well.
pmwglock19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 09:37   #53
Mikey Idaho
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
I see them as both being perfectly viable but I will only choose Mossberg for myself due to the ambi safely as I'm a lefty. Couldn't be happier with my 930 SPX, except that I stepped on my magazine spring last week while cleaning lol.

Sent from my Verizon Galaxy S III using Tapatalk 2
Mikey Idaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2012, 10:56   #54
F106 Fan
Senior Member
 
F106 Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 6,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landmonster View Post
Not to open a huge can of worms....

but ...
  1. What makes a Benelli a better choice for home-defense than either of these 2 guns?
  2. Is semi-auto really a more prudent choice than a pump-action shotgun for home-defense?
Just rip that lid clean off...

The Marine Corp certainly likes the Benelli M4 and so do I! The thing is magnificent.

The only potential problem with the pump action shotgun is short stroking under pressure. With training, it won't happen so there's no point in considering it. Except...

How many people actually train with their shotguns? Around here, short barrel and pistol grip shotguns are not even allowed on the trap/skeet range. They're also not allowed at many gun clubs. In fact, about the only place they are allowed is in the pits of my not-so-local action pistol range. Not everybody is going to be able to practice enough to be really competent and the pump action is just one more factor.

For a person to truly master a pump gun, it might take a thousand rounds or more. For a semi-auto, it won't take nearly as long. There just isn't as much muscle memory to build up. Most people want to fire a box or two and call it good. They stuff the shotgun under the bed and hope for the best. Let's face it, shooing 00 buck is not all that much fun and it gets pretty expensive. Sure, you can shoot Wally World target loads but that isn't the same thing.

Earlier in this thread I mentioned that I couldn't come up with a single scenario where I would use a shotgun for CQB inside a house. I haven't changed my opinion. So...

Sights? On a shotgun? Why?

First of all, any type of sight is useless unless the weapon is shouldered. Therefore any scenario where the gun is fired off the shoulder, sights don't even come into play. Second, if the weapon is shouldered properly, there is no need for a rear sight. Trying to align the front post in the nifty little ring is a waste of time. Your cheek is the rear sight and a simple bead up front is all that is required.

Maybe the V style rear (deer) sights are workable but those tacti-cool ghost rings are a PITA.

My latest 870 Tactical and my M4 both have ghost ring sights. I really wish they didn't. That type of sight is just too slow. My very old 870 Police has a simple bead up front and that's the sight arrangement I prefer. It's fast on target.

I can hit tactical sized targets at 50 yards with a simple bead sight and I don't believe in shooting a shotgun beyond that distance. If I want to reach out, I'll use a rifle.

I think folks tend to overthink the CQB thing. I'm not certain that a shotgun even applies inside a house, I don't think they can practice enough to stay proficient with any shotgun, much less a pump gun, and I don't see any advantage to ghost ring sights.

I shoot at least 100 times more pistol ammo than shotgun. I have both but for SD, I prefer the handgun.

But I'm in the minority...

Richard
__________________
"No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up." - Lily Tomlin

Last edited by F106 Fan; 12-05-2012 at 12:23..
F106 Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 10:45   #55
Landmonster
Senior Member
 
Landmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,039
Interesting post.

Would you say there's no need for a shotgun for HD if you own a pistol and/or AR15 rifle?
Landmonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2012, 10:59   #56
Kilrain
Señor Member
 
Kilrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the road to Shambala
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landmonster View Post
Interesting post.

Would you say there's no need for a shotgun for HD if you own a pistol and/or AR15 rifle?
Isn't your firearm NEED going to be based on your particular set of circumstances and expectations when it comes to a "home defense" situation? A pistol, rifle or shotgun may be perfect for you, or a combination of them, however you need to assess, make a plan and determine how you intend to use it.

__________________
The hog of the forsaken,

He is the pork of crime

- Michael Hurley
Kilrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 16:48   #57
concretefuzzynuts
Brew Crew
 
concretefuzzynuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: VB, VA
Posts: 6,261
__________________
GTDS Member #7
GOTOD Member #757
Snub Club Member #757
NRA Member
Member
concretefuzzynuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 17:38   #58
jrd22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 131
I don't know how relevant this is but I bought a new Remington semi auto last year and had nothing but trouble with it. It was replaced with a new gun and it has the same issues but to a lesser degree. I'm not sure todays Remington is making guns of the same quality that they used to. Or maybe I've just had really bad luck. I have had the opportunity to shoot two Mossburgs and they have worked flawlessly, but the old Rems that I have do too.
jrd22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 18:02   #59
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Landmonster View Post
Interesting post.

Would you say there's no need for a shotgun for HD if you own a pistol and/or AR15 rifle?
There is no need for a lot of things in life, but there may be a "purpose" to them.

If you never had to use a pistol or an AR, it would make a case that you didn't "need" them either.
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 21:01   #60
Kilrain
Señor Member
 
Kilrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: On the road to Shambala
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by countrygun View Post
There is no need for a lot of things in life, but there may be a "purpose" to them.

If you never had to use a pistol or an AR, it would make a case that you didn't "need" them either.
Quoted for truth...........
__________________
The hog of the forsaken,

He is the pork of crime

- Michael Hurley
Kilrain is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:12.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,206
335 Members
871 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31