Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2012, 10:16   #21
Morris
CLM Number
Charter Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Seattle, South of Canada
Posts: 11,549


Alex Jones.

His outlet was one of the first to breathlessly report this on-line. The problem is, when you do the math and breakdowns, you realize that it isn't much considering the numbers. As others have written, sometimes JHPs are cheaper per case than FMJs.

If nothing else, it drive traffic to Jones' website so he can peddle more tactical and end of the world stuff and garner more ad money.
__________________
Neo-pagan, FORMER Libertarian, Cop, Gun Owner, Jewish Heritage - I'm the small talk at parties!

Certified Glock Armorer
Certified M&P Armorer

Say NO! to Washington I-594
Morris is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 12:27   #22
Ohio Copper
Senior Member
 
Ohio Copper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The Rust Belt.
Posts: 4,606
I work for a very small department and we order about 10k rounds each year.

The larger SOs qualify 300+ employees twice a year. They order and receive 40-50k rounds a year.

It is plausible for them to be purchasing that much ammo in one shot.


" I was wondering what would break first; your spirit or your body."
__________________
Quote:
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do.

Benjamin Franklin
Quote:
Just being a federally "prohibited person" who owns guns and signatures about them on the internet should be enough to keep him paranoid."
Ohio Copper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 13:04   #23
Trigger Finger
Senior Member
 
Trigger Finger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,220
"Now, consider the fact that everyone is required to qualify four times a year, and there is a lot of "range play" as well that consume rounds: shoot and move, down and disabled, on and on."
"It is a package deal. Also, the philosophy is to qualify with what you are going to carry, so it has never been full metal jackets, it has always been hollow points. "
Kingarthurhk! What are you basing this on? Who says "everyone" is required to qualify four times a year? And what does "package deal" mean? And how can you possibly compare the ammo used by the military, fighting a war, to a law enforcement agency?

And anyone who says JHP rounds are cheaper then FMJ rounds have not shopped around enough for the best price! Why do you think every major police department uses FMJ rounds to qualify? According to you it's because they cost more!!
30 years with the largest police department on the west coast and I have not heard of any of this.
__________________
Land of the Free Because of the Brave!
It is easier to be critical than correct and most people tend to take the easy way!



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by Trigger Finger; 11-03-2012 at 13:10..
Trigger Finger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 13:34   #24
Newcop761
CLM Number 145
Charter Lifetime Member
 
Newcop761's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In Existential Crisis
Posts: 4,569


My "police department" has about 50% more gun toters than LAPD.

We are required to qualify 4 times per year. Period.
Kingarthurhk knows this first hand.

Border Patrol (which has twice the gun-toters than LAPD) shoots a course of fire which consumes more rounds than the ICE qualification.... The round count adds up.
__________________
Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.--Lucius Annaeus Seneca 'the Younger' (ca. 4 BC-65 AD)
BORDERS.LANGUAGE.CULTURE.
Newcop761 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 13:45   #25
CAcop
Senior Member
 
CAcop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,110
State bid in CA you can get 64gr Powerpoint cheaper than FMJ and Win Ranger Bonded in .40 than FMJ. I suspect it is because of the CHP. We get Fords far cheaper than at the local fleet dealers when we piggyback off of the CHP. State Parks used to piggyback 4006s with the CHP until recently.

I think ammo manufacturers will give you a big price break if you agree to buy in bulk. If I were DHS or any large agency I would buy in multi year amounts to save money. Say every 4 years buy the ammo you think you will need for the next 5 years.
__________________
I wonder if your assessment of "The Wizard of Oz" would sound something like "A teenaged orphan runs away with three psychotic AD/HD patients and a little dog. She kills the first two women she meets." --Sinecure 07/03/2006
Freakin' awsome!! Kickin it old school. Hot sheet on the dash. The report was probably only two sentences. Long live Rencko and Bobbie Hill!--WhiskeyT
CAcop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 15:01   #26
Kingarthurhk
Isaiah 53:4-9
 
Kingarthurhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigger Finger View Post
"Now, consider the fact that everyone is required to qualify four times a year, and there is a lot of "range play" as well that consume rounds: shoot and move, down and disabled, on and on."
"It is a package deal. Also, the philosophy is to qualify with what you are going to carry, so it has never been full metal jackets, it has always been hollow points. "
Kingarthurhk! What are you basing this on? Who says "everyone" is required to qualify four times a year? And what does "package deal" mean? And how can you possibly compare the ammo used by the military, fighting a war, to a law enforcement agency?

And anyone who says JHP rounds are cheaper then FMJ rounds have not shopped around enough for the best price! Why do you think every major police department uses FMJ rounds to qualify? According to you it's because they cost more!!
30 years with the largest police department on the west coast and I have not heard of any of this.
15 years of experience?
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 20SF, 21C, 22, 26, 27, Glock E-Tool, Glock knife
Quod ego haereticus appellari sequere Jesum.
Kingarthurhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 15:33   #27
Trigger Finger
Senior Member
 
Trigger Finger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,220
The 46,000 rounds is a non-issue ever since I said that I stand corrected. But some of you keep bringing it up!!
That's just a small part of the amount I was referring to.

"On top of that, the DHS buy order was for about 40,000,000 rounds of .40 S&W JHPs all told. That’s a lot of ammo."

This is mainly what I was referring to. That's 40 million!!!!!!

And when you said "everyone" is required to qualify a certain number of times, I took that to mean everyone in law enforcement. I know this is not the case with LAPD and a number of other departments! You did not specify.

I hope everyone here knows that I am extremely Pro Law Enforcement. I just thought this high number concerns me!
__________________
Land of the Free Because of the Brave!
It is easier to be critical than correct and most people tend to take the easy way!



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by Trigger Finger; 11-03-2012 at 15:35..
Trigger Finger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 15:55   #28
Kingarthurhk
Isaiah 53:4-9
 
Kingarthurhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigger Finger View Post
The 46,000 rounds is a non-issue ever since I said that I stand corrected. But some of you keep bringing it up!!
That's just a small part of the amount I was referring to.

"On top of that, the DHS buy order was for about 40,000,000 rounds of .40 S&W JHPs all told. Thatís a lot of ammo."

This is mainly what I was referring to. That's 40 million!!!!!!

And when you said "everyone" is required to qualify a certain number of times, I took that to mean everyone in law enforcement. I know this is not the case with LAPD and a number of other departments! You did not specify.

I hope everyone here knows that I am extremely Pro Law Enforcement. I just thought this high number concerns me!
It is because you are ignorant. And that is not your fault. .40 Caliber ammunition has been standard issue pistol since I was stuck with the Beretta 96D, then the H&K .40 USP DA, and then the Sig DAK. However, this will blow your mind too, if you purchase your own pistol you can get a Glock, but it has to be a 9mm. Also, for the longest time the Customs issued pistol was the Glock 19. Now, the privately owned pistols are the Glock 17 and 26. I carry both, because I like Glock. It is reliable. I don't like 9mm, but if it is Glock that is what you get.

Also, you will have to consider that on top of the .40 there is 12 guage and .223 amuntion. The standard 3 gun for Border Patrol these days is H&K P200, a Wilson Combat 12 guage, and an M-4 (now 3 round burst).

So, you have virutally every federal law enforcement agency carrying .40 for the standard sidearm, except Glock freaks like me. Though, years ago the FBI when I worked along side their Agents carried Glock 22 .40, the Glock expception to the rule apprently.

So, virtually everyone out there has .40. The academies burn through tons of the stuff. For those who are street hires they have to have a pistol course that consumes a great deal of ammo to bring them up to speed.

Then you the folks out in the field qualifying 4 times a year, being issued duty ammo and practice ammo on top of that, and it ends up being a butt load of ammo.

So, the figures are not off. There is no great conspiracy. It is just someone noticed the volume of ammo. Considering there are about 200k of those folks out there more or less, the ammuniton draw is not that staggeringly impressive.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 20SF, 21C, 22, 26, 27, Glock E-Tool, Glock knife
Quod ego haereticus appellari sequere Jesum.
Kingarthurhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 15:56   #29
RWBlue
CLM Number 120
Mr. CISSP, CISA
 
RWBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28,802
IMHO, this isn't that much ammo considering the number of people involved.
__________________
One day, I shall come back. Yes, I shall come back. Until then, there must be no regrets, no tears, no anxieties. Just go forward in all your beliefs and prove to me that I am not mistaken in mine.
RWBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 16:05   #30
steveksux
Massive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 15,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post

So, virtually everyone out there has .40. The academies burn through tons of the stuff. For those who are street hires they have to have a pistol course that consumes a great deal of ammo to bring them up to speed.

Then you the folks out in the field qualifying 4 times a year, being issued duty ammo and practice ammo on top of that, and it ends up being a butt load of ammo.


If that's a buttload of ammo, I need a new butt!

That's more than I want in my butt!

Randy
steveksux is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 16:14   #31
Kingarthurhk
Isaiah 53:4-9
 
Kingarthurhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveksux View Post


If that's a buttload of ammo, I need a new butt!

That's more than I want in my butt!

Randy
Well, let's see: Do law enforcement have to be exposed to CS Gas? Check. Do they have to sprayed with OC spray? Check. Do they have to be shot with a taser gun? Check. So, taking a round in the butt can't be too far oof.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 20SF, 21C, 22, 26, 27, Glock E-Tool, Glock knife
Quod ego haereticus appellari sequere Jesum.
Kingarthurhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 16:17   #32
CJStudent
Fenced In
 
CJStudent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 17,867
Send a message via AIM to CJStudent Send a message via Yahoo to CJStudent
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post
Well, let's see: Do law enforcement have to be exposed to CS Gas? Check. Do they have to sprayed with OC spray? Check. Do they have to be shot with a taser gun? Check. So, taking a round in the butt can't be too far oof.
"Oof" is right!
__________________
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." -- Thomas Edison

Quote:
The first round is a moral decision. All of the following rounds are tactical decisions.
CJStudent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 16:42   #33
ray9898
Senior Member
 
ray9898's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 17,896


This is rather weird question and follow up question to be coming from a "30 year cop". Most of this is common sense and simple math. I expect a conspiracy theorist to be shocked, not a LEO who should have basic knowledge of training and the ability to do simple math.
ray9898 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 18:03   #34
dpadams6
Senior Member
 
dpadams6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJStudent View Post
I can't open the link right now, but if it's from the previous stories I've read on it, it was a contract for UP TO a particular amount. DHS owns and operates the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, which trains officers and agents from the vast majority of federal law enforcement agencies (including SSA and NWS and many other obscure agencies' Offices of Inspector General Special Agents). Think about how much firearms training is done in LAPD's academy. Then think about how many academies are going on AT ONE TIME on FLETC; it's in the dozens. Think about how many rounds each class uses, and multiply that out. That's just the basic classes, not even counting the advanced training that's going on. Plus all the ammo needed for all of the agencies under DHS to requalify and train under their policies. THAT is why they put out those bids.
I don't think its unreasonable at all. It takes A TON of ammo in all that training and roughly 50 rounds on each individuals belt, minimum.
dpadams6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 18:05   #35
dpadams6
Senior Member
 
dpadams6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigger Finger View Post
I understand all of that but all of this ammo is JHP. You don't need JHP for training or qualifications.

And the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's National Weather Service is getting 46,000 rounds of 40 S&W Jacketed Hollow Points. For what? I didn't know their were pistol packing weatherman!!!

The site is " http://guns.com/ ". Today's story!
My Dept trains with what we carry. 357sig hst.
dpadams6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 19:06   #36
johnson8861
Daddo Chomper
 
johnson8861's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Great state of Indiana
Posts: 1,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-1 View Post
I am at a loss as to what the problem is.

At my agency, each officer shoots 50 rounds per month at the range and qualifies once per quarter. On top of that, each officer probably shoot another 100 round per year practicing new drills. That comes out to 700 rounds per officer, per year. We shoot the same ammo at the range as we shoot in the field for reasons of civil liability. This way if someone sues us over an officer involved shooting, their lawyer can't claim we were unfamiliar with the characteristics of our duty ammo because we only shoot ball at the range.

I am going to assume the Fed follow a similar protocol. The article says the Feds bought 40,220,000 rounds. By my agency's standards that's enough annual practice ammo for 54,457 officers. So how many cops do the Feds have? Let's count -

8,500 Special Agents HSI
7,000 Deportation Officers & Immigration Enforcement Agents
21,370 Border Patrol agents
21,186 CBP Officers
4,400 +/- Secret Service Special Agents + Uniformed Division
295 Social Security Special Agents

Total 62,751

I'm sure there are a lot more, but lets just go with these.

62,751 Feds X 700 rounds per year = 43,925,700 rounds needed

OOPS. It looks like the Feds didn't order enough ammo for everyone to practice monthly at the range over the next fiscal year. They are either going to have to order 3,705,700 more rounds, or someone is going to have to skip going to the range, or they are going to have to stop shooting bad guys in the field.
DOJ as a whole, mint police, washington dc police, Irs police, just to name a few feds that also need to practice with ammo.
__________________
Try to look unimportant; the enemy may be low on ammo and not want to waste a bullet on you.
Murph's Laws of Combat
johnson8861 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 20:28   #37
Trigger Finger
Senior Member
 
Trigger Finger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,220
Let's see, I have been called Ignorant, having a lack of Common Sense, can't do Simple Math and having no Knowledge of Training. At the same time being told that I should know all of this having 30 years as a police officer, detective and detective supervisor.

Maybe you all are correct. For the last 8 years on the job I worked a specialized Surveillance Unit where we would sometimes remain in the field for days at a time. Before that I worked homicide and before that gang suppression and investigation. I was never involved in procuring ammunition or any other tools of the trade other that testing vests and individual weapons and vehicles for the units I was in.

I guess allot of you college boys who sometimes would work the field in between ordering thousands of rounds of ammunition for all weapons your department would use, and attempt to train others, then in the meantime bad mouth old dinosaurs like me and wonder why working cops don't understand the expenditures of his department.

I came on the job to arrest evil doers and did not care about who orders what in what quantity!

Someone's got to do it but bad mouthing those who don't are beneath most of you who really are cops!
__________________
Land of the Free Because of the Brave!
It is easier to be critical than correct and most people tend to take the easy way!



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Trigger Finger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 20:47   #38
EPTSSP
Vigilante
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post
Well, let's see: Do law enforcement have to be exposed to CS Gas? Check. Do they have to sprayed with OC spray? Check. Do they have to be shot with a taser gun? Check. So, taking a round in the butt can't be too far oof.
PA's as end users are not required to take the ride, or CS gas.

ETA: I saw you said LEO's in general. I thought you were talking about the Patrol.
__________________
"

Last edited by EPTSSP; 11-03-2012 at 20:47..
EPTSSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 20:55   #39
blk69stang
Senior Member
 
blk69stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 524
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawman800 View Post
I forgot where I read it but someone did the math for every agency and every training and qual and all that and the math works out to about maybe a few year's worth of ammo for everything. Relatively speaking, it's not that big of a deal compared to how much ammo some of us hoard.

^^^ I've posted the math covering this in umpteen different threads. I won't go through the entire equation again, but here's some numbers to get you started:

DHS is REQUIRED to qualify quarterly, and the "standard" ammo issue per qual is 250 rounds. That's 1000 rounds of ammo per officer, per year. So multiply officers X 1000 rounds, and you get how many rounds per year each agency needs.

Or conversely, take the number of rounds purchased by the agency, divide it by 1000, then divide THAT figure by the number of officers, and you get how many years it will take to shoot up that ammo at current rates of consumption. Usually, you take the figure posted by the tinfoil hatter, then divide it by (officers*1000) and the answer is in the single digits, if it isn't a decimal figure.

People have no idea of the order of magnitude you're dealing with when it comes to Federal Government ammo consumption. Then again, most people also can't be bothered to do some basic math to check and see if the "sky is falling" headline they're parroting is going to make them look like an idiot or not.
blk69stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 20:58   #40
blk69stang
Senior Member
 
blk69stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 524
Oh, and I nearly forgot the tinfoil hat claim of "if all this ammo is for practice, why are they buying HOLLOWPOINTS?"

The answer was already covered by a previous post in this thread:

Quote:
We shoot the same ammo at the range as we shoot in the field for reasons of civil liability. This way if someone sues us over an officer involved shooting, their lawyer can't claim we were unfamiliar with the characteristics of our duty ammo because we only shoot ball at the range.
That, and also because if you shoot ball at the range, you can be guaranteed that some booger eater is going to sneak some home and it will find its way into his duty carry ammo. At DHS, we only deal with duty-carry ammo. This way we only have to deal with one type, and you don't have to worry about having the wrong kind on hand. We only have one type of ammo: the right kind (and damn the expense).

Tens of thousands of rounds for ANY agency in the Fed Gov is NOTHING. Statistically negligible.

Millions of rounds for an agency is maybe a 5 year supply, at best.

Billions of rounds - either an agency is expanding, or they're buying ammo a decade ahead, or it's a contract for multiple agencies, like maybe the entire DHS or DOJ putting out one collective contract for all the agencies under their umbrella.

A trillion plus rounds - Might be time to raise an eyebrow, unless it's a DOD wartime contract. For a civilian agency though, that *MIGHT* be an order of magnitude large enough where you might be justified in worrying.

Last edited by blk69stang; 11-03-2012 at 21:03.. Reason: spelling
blk69stang is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 743
201 Members
542 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31