Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
10-06-2012, 12:36
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,942
|
Goofy question, but does anybody know when S&W...
...changed the style of the ampersand (&) between "Smith" and "Wesson"?
I'm trying to figure out when my new-to-me 39 was built. It has the ampersand with the larger curve. I have many Smiths and just went through my whole collection. The only other model I have using that ampersand is my 1955 K-frame revolver, so I'm thinking the 39 is pretty old.
You can see the difference in the ampersand between my 39 and 539.
I notice quite a few small details and I know its a goofy question, but does anyone have an answer? If you have an old Smith with the early ampersand, what year is it?
I'm hoping somebody knows. After all, I just went through every Smith I own looking at ampersands.
Thanks, in advance, for any help.
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 15:06
|
#2
|
|
affiant
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NW FL
Posts: 3,735
|
Goofy answer. I would suggest, if you don't already know about it:
http://smith-wessonforum.com/
__________________
"consistency is not a substitute for rationality"
Last edited by Rick C; 10-06-2012 at 16:41..
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
10-06-2012, 17:02
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,942
|
Thanks Rick
Yeah, I'm a member, so I guess I'll post.
There are some knowledgable people over there when it comes to S&W.
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 17:22
|
#4
|
|
Platinum Membership
NRA
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,168
|
Seems there was some intermingling of fonts for "&" on S & W handcuffs in the 60's.
__________________
janice6
"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". Anonymous
Earp: Not everyone who knows you hates you.
DOC: I know it ain't always easy bein' my friend....but I'll BE THERE when you need me.
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 22:31
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Angeles, Northern Mexico
Posts: 436
|
I have a 39-2 from about 1980 and it has the same as your 539.
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 01:04
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trapped_in_Kali
I have a 39-2 from about 1980 and it has the same as your 539.
|
Yeah, the change happened way before then. I have early 70's models with the new style.
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 07:56
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: nebraska
Posts: 182
|
aren't you about done rubbing that "steal" of a gun in our faces?
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 08:07
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kooman
aren't you about done rubbing that "steal" of a gun in our faces? 
|
Hey, after what I paid for some guns this past summer, I deserve a good deal or two.
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 08:12
|
#9
|
|
Silver Membership
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 2,439
|
The serial number range for modern autoloaders began with 1001 in 1954 and ran up to 115000 in 1970. After this the had an A prefix for some time. I'm just guessing yours was made between 1969-70.
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 08:13
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S FL
Posts: 13,245
|
I paged through the Standard Catalog of Smith and Wesson last night and did not see anything regarding the ampersand change. My guess is that it might be different for the pistol slide than for revolver barrels and my other guess is that whenever the change was made might not be the most accurate dating method. Especially in that time it seems as if Smith and Wesson may have had substantial stocks of some parts that got stacked up somewhere and not used right away. My guess is that we still see the results of that over the last decade or so when they suddenly reintroduce some discontinued version for a small run.
__________________
Bruce
I never talked to anyone who had to fire their gun who said "I wished I had the smaller gun and fewer rounds with me" Just because you find a hundred people who agree with you on the internet does not mean you're right.
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 08:29
|
#11
|
|
Silver Membership
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 2,439
|
Bruce makes a very good point. There is no real way of knowing a S&W's birth date without getting a factory letter. They often stock piled parts to be used up at a much latter date. While the serial numbers are good clues it is not uncommon to see a gun born on a date long after that serial number block was used up.
For as many of these guns you buy the book would be a good investment for you. Really not all that expensive.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-Standard...item231d13fec1
Last edited by pennlineman; 10-07-2012 at 08:30..
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 08:30
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce M
I paged through the Standard Catalog of Smith and Wesson last night and did not see anything regarding the ampersand change. My guess is that it might be different for the pistol slide than for revolver barrels and my other guess is that whenever the change was made might not be the most accurate dating method. Especially in that time it seems as if Smith and Wesson may have had substantial stocks of some parts that got stacked up somewhere and not used right away. My guess is that we still see the results of that over the last decade or so when they suddenly reintroduce some discontinued version for a small run.
|
Very true
They probably changed it, but still had many parts in stock of the old style. Like I said, the only other Smith I own with it is my 1955 Target Masterpiece.
You can see it clearly here. Its the only Smith revolver I own with it.
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 08:31
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pennlineman
Bruce makes a very good point. There is no real way of knowing a S&W's birth date without getting a factory letter. They often stock piled parts to be used up at a much latter date. While the serial numbers are good clues it is not uncommon to see a gun born on a date long after that serial number block was used up.
For as many of these guns you buy the book would be a good investment for you. Really not all that expensive.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-Standard...item231d13fec1
|
Thanks
Yeah, I probably should break down and get one of those.
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 12:05
|
#14
|
|
CLM Number 291
Honk Honk
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taylorsville, KY
Posts: 19,042
|
Brian, this was made in 1957, and has the large ampersand.
__________________
Look, we whipped the World's ass at the Olympics, we have an effin SUV rolling around on Mars, and now our Flag has a confirmed kill. How great is that?
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 12:59
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 77,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gruntmedik
Brian, this was made in 1957, and has the large ampersand.

|
Thanks and very nice, by the way.
The no dash 39 was made from 1954 to 1966. I'm thinking mine may be closer to the early part of the run.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16.
|
|
|