Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2012, 04:56   #21
NRA Life Member
Bren's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 39,968
Originally Posted by SpoiledBySig View Post
Been looking for decent patrol video cameras for DUI's. State Attorney's Office is starting to refuse prosecuting DUI's without video of DUI Roadside sobriety Testing/Tasks on video.
Seems like what you really need is a better prosecutor. Those who came before him have been getting convictions since my grandparents were born. Of course, that requires a prosecutor to do more than saying "watch this."
Anti-gun liberals can only call us idiots; it takes an idiot with a gun to prove them right.
- Me, 2014.
Bren is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 09:03   #22
No Infidels!
DaBigBR's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Circling the wagons.
Posts: 15,986
Glock Talk is keeping from getting to bed, so I'll keep it short.

Are we talking body worn camera or car camera here?

A good, digital car camera system is going to gost $3k-$5k fairly typically. There are cheaper systems and spendier systems. I have experience with Watchguard and L3/Mobile Vision digital systems.

Watchguard was "adequate", but we had issues with intermittent corrupted recordings that had to be recovered with special software. The small department I worked for at the time could not afford the infrastructure a digital system that stored video to a hard drive would take, so the DVD based system was a good way to get in to a digital camera without all of the back end work. They changed the body mic design three times between the first one we bought and the second one. I think that was just over a year. It took a lot of beggining to get them to comp us a matching body mic when the junk one the first system came with **** the bed. Overall they were easy enough to work with and I liked the menu system and so forth on the camera.

Current department is L3/Mobile Vision (as are at least two other agencies in the county). We just recently replaced our camera systems with the newest version, which is higher resolution. The quality is very good, the security, storage, and web based access are good. The body mics are good. Our biggest issue is that the larger resolution has led to greater recording file sizes, which coupled with wifi oversaturation and congestion, are killing are wireless uploads and forcing our supervisors to manually swap out a bunch of cards every shift. The back end infrastructure is significant. I believe that our "live" video server has 14TB of storage and they have a DVD writer spitting out several DVDs a day to archive footage. There are drawers full of DVDs and they have every piece of video ever recorded on the system, which goes back to maybe 2004 or 2005.

There are plenty of limitations to car camera systems. Fixed point of view being the most significant. The camera only sees what is in front of it. Narrow viewing angles contribute, but are necessary to keep things from distorting. Body mic performance is not always great. Perspective is difficult ("are you sure they missed heel to toe by more than a half inch there, officer?"). There are plenty of good things and plenty of negatives, too. More good than bad.

If you're considering body worn cameras, a truly "good" system is going to run $900-$1,000 per unit. When I refer to a good system, I am talking about build quality, durability, infrastructure, etc. The only two decent body worn systems that come right to mind are VieVU and AXON Flex. Both have back-end software packages to automate uploads, which many of the cheaper cameras don't. I am nearing the end of a trial of AXON Flex and am extremely pleased with the low light video capability. Better than any other video camera I have seen. I have made several drunk driving arrests while wearing it and the video is very good.

The downsides to body worn systems are also very numerous and the limitations of the systems are not always readily visible. For example, the field of view is still relatively limited, so things you see with your peripheral vision simply do not appear on the camera. I have a thread floating around on my experience with AXON Flex somewhere, as well.
"Logic is rarely the engine that propels a police department forward."

-David Simon in "Homicide"
DaBigBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 18:16   #23
Senior Member
SpoiledBySig's Avatar
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Port St. Lucie, FL
Posts: 1,938
Real great help from everybody here and even some PM's came in with good suggestions.

This morning I got with our Department's ID tech and we reviewed all the responses that I had so far. One thing we gladly discovered (thanks to Blue iron) is that many companies offer a 30 day free trial (what better way to really find out?).

Thanks for all the responses and we (ITTech and I) will consider all the suggestions...been a big help.
That's my story...and i'm stickin' to it!!!
SpoiledBySig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 19:31   #24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Stacked up on your door
Posts: 908

That's the system we use.
RocPO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 23:02   #25
CLM Number
Charter Lifetime Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Seattle, South of Canada
Posts: 12,025

Some things to think about for video:

1) Is it encrypted or tamper proof? That can and will be challenged by even a reasonably competent defense attorney.
2) Can the video be easily reviewed on current technology?
3) Does the camera have good low light capabilities? Most do not unless you are in a reasonably lit area.

I have used the VieVu for some time. Good camera meeting the above save low light.

However, it begs the challenge of your prosecutor being so incompetent that they need an electronic crutch. It seems your chief needs to address this with the prosecutor's office, or make them pay for the equipment. Through my experience and working with others that new prosecutors of the "me" generation have the mindset that if it isn't on video, they can't make things happen.
Neo-pagan, FORMER Libertarian, Cop, Gun Owner, Jewish Heritage - I'm the small talk at parties!

Certified Glock Armorer
Certified M&P Armorer

One day closer to retirement . . .
Morris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 23:19   #26
Senior Member
wrangler_dave9's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: St. George, UT
Posts: 219
Not an officer yet, but I know the local sheriff's office uses the L3 system that has already been mentioned. great system from what I've seen from ride-a-longs and volunteering in the evidence room. System automatically uploads videos to the server over wifi when within range. Also, after the stop is completed, you can categorize the video (arrest, citation, pursuit) and there is an individual folder for each officer's video which is then organized by day than category. Not sure on price, but definitely worth looking at.

Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine

Last edited by wrangler_dave9; 10-06-2012 at 00:37..
wrangler_dave9 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:57.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 968
297 Members
671 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03