Important Notice: The site is currently being upgraded to a new software system. This process could take a day or two to complete. During that time, we are going to leave the site up here, on its old software. WHAT GETS POSTED HERE DURING THIS TRANSITION WILL NOT BE COPIED OVER ONTO THE NEW SITE, WHEN THE UPGRADE IS COMPLETE. When we swap over, the content posted while this message is visible will be lost. We wanted to give you folks a place to hang out and talk while we worked though. We will let you know when we are finished. Please pardon the inconvenience, during this transition.

Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2012, 15:57   #1
Senior Member
jbp84's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Central Illinois
Posts: 136
Court strikes down Illinois' Conceal Carry Ban

Could it be? For real? It's almost too good to be true.

jbp84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 18:15   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 997
Hold on tight, it's gonna be a wild ride. Barring an appeal, if Illinois passes concealed carry, will they go with "shall issue" or will they follow in New Jersey and Maryland's footsteps and pass a "may-issue" law? I wonder. And if/when it goes "may-issue" then keep an eye on the US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the Woollard v. Sheridan case, where Woollard is challenging Maryland's "may-issue" statute. Woollard already won at the district court level. The appellate court is expected to announce its opinion this spring.

Since Maryland is in the 4th circuit, and Illinois is in the 7th circuit, the 7th circuit's holding in the Woollard case would not be binding on Illinois. Here come the appeals to the US Supreme Court.

This could take a while.
JohnnyE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 18:36   #3
Senior Member
jbp84's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Central Illinois
Posts: 136
I agree that the fight is far from over, but this is an enormous precedent. The NRA is going to use this as a precedent in it's other legal battles (including the 4th circuit).

"The Constitutional right of armed self-defense is broader than the right to have a gun in one's home."

jbp84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2012, 16:38   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,793
I'm not too optimistic. I live in Chicago and Mayors here have a habit of whining and thumbing their noses at the federal government when they don't get their way.
as400guy1 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 592
163 Members
429 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03