[kirgi08]

Doc,the one dumba s went ta sniper school and qualed.My being a impatient individual worked.As you said.'08.

[kirgi08]

A soldier does improve the core.'08.,

[Cavalry Doc]

A few are lucid....

Because it would make them the laughingstock of the Republican party. You people are so lacking in perspective it's just not funny.
----------------------
"If you study science deep enough and long enough, it will force you to believe in God." ~Lord Kelvin

[countrygun]

Originally Posted by G19G20

"Those who do not understand history are doomed to repeat it."

.

OH, god, where to begin? Let's start with two words

"Ross Perot"

After you grasp that we will move on to another history lesson and try to get you up to speed.

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by countrygun

OH, god, where to begin? Let's start with two words

"Ross Perot"

After you grasp that we will move on to another history lesson and try to get you up to speed.

So what you're saying is the oldest history you pay attention to was less than 20 years ago? Your history lessons must be pretty short, not to mention wrong, so I'll pass.

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc

I can't post some of the replies to the RNC caalling this whole exercise what it really is, [sic]frivilous.

I know everytime I come across something frivolous, I make great efforts to deliver a serious response.

Originally Posted by RNC atty Phillippe

He added: "We view the suit as completely frivolous but one to which a serious response must be made."

I hope you enjoyed your trip around some of the Paul sites. Hopefully you learned something and see why our movement is by far the most enthusiastic and involved in all of politics.

[countrygun]

Originally Posted by G19G20

So what you're saying is the oldest history you pay attention to was less than 20 years ago? Your history lessons must be pretty short, not to mention wrong, so I'll pass.

Well since you apparently missed that lesson I am afraid we are going to have to put you into the "Sub-remedial" class next fall.

[QNman]

Originally Posted by G19G20

So what you're saying is the oldest history you pay attention to was less than 20 years ago? Your history lessons must be pretty short, not to mention wrong, so I'll pass.

Just like you are unwilling to learn from a lesson in LESS than 25 years?

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

So what you're saying is the oldest history you pay attention to was less than 20 years ago? Your history lessons must be pretty short, not to mention wrong, so I'll pass.

Dude, you need to stop.

You were the bozo that tried to hammer another poster over your false belief that the Founders set up the RNC nomination process. There were other gaffes on your part too. You have no standing (might sound familiar soon) to critisize anyone on historical accuracy.

You are great comedic relief by the way.

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

I know everytime I come across something frivolous, I make great efforts to deliver a serious response.

Sure you do.

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc

Dude, you need to stop.

You were the bozo that tried to hammer another poster over your false belief that the Founders set up the RNC nomination process. There were other gaffes on your part too. You have no standing (might sound familiar soon) to critisize anyone on historical accuracy.

You are great comedic relief by the way.

You armchair politicos are the comic relief. It's better to laugh than cry....

The Founders set up the idea of checks and balances within the government, which includes the electoral system. You can keep twisting my post to say whatever you want it to say but nowhere did I say the Founders wrote the RNC convention rules in the Constitution. You're being more than disingenuous here but that's par for the course for the peanut gallery here.

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc

Sure you do.

You have a point. I probably do spend too much time on this forum.

[ChuteTheMall]

Originally Posted by G19G20

I probably do spend too much time on this forum.

I think we can all agree on that.

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by ChuteTheMall

I think we can all agree on that.

But then folks like you remind me why I still participate so thanks for that. You'd love to have your echo chamber back, wouldn't you? Naaa....not on my watch. Way too many people read (but not post in) this forum to not use it as a platform to discuss, educate and hopefully convert casual viewers.

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

You armchair politicos are the comic relief. It's better to laugh than cry....

The Founders set up the idea of checks and balances within the government, which includes the electoral system. You can keep twisting my post to say whatever you want it to say but nowhere did I say the Founders wrote the RNC convention rules in the Constitution. You're being more than disingenuous here but that's par for the course for the peanut gallery here.



You have a point. I probably do spend too much time on this forum.

You really have no clue how wrong you are.

You attempted to bash another poster over the head for not following the wishes of the founders, about the nomination process, which did not exist prior to 1820.

Feel free to post a link to the thread to discount my recollection.

You are being more than ignorant in your posts, which is par for the course.

Google stuff before you post them as fact, I'm getting exhausted laughing at you. Cut me some slack.

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by ChuteTheMall

I think we can all agree on that.

I just want him to use Google before he tries to make a point on historical references that he has no clue about. He's tripped over his own THC addled mind more often than I can count recently.

[countrygun]

Originally Posted by G19G20

But then folks like you remind me why I still participate so thanks for that. You'd love to have your echo chamber back, wouldn't you? Naaa....not on my watch. Way too many people read (but not post in) this forum to not use it as a platform to discuss, educate and hopefully convert casual viewers.

Drug abuse ceases to be funny when you start hallucenating in public. You really think you are "converting" people????

what do you do, baptize them with bong water?

You have been consistantly wrong with your historical references and yet you imagine that will "convert" people"

Dude, those aren't colored Doritos, they're paint chips.

[Snowman92D]

Originally Posted by countrygun

Drug abuse ceases to be funny when you start hallucenating in public. You really think you are "converting" people????

what do you do, baptize them with bong water?

You have been consistantly wrong with your historical references and yet you imagine that will "convert" people"

Dude, theose aren't colored Doritos, they're paint chips.

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

But then folks like you remind me why I still participate so thanks for that. You'd love to have your echo chamber back, wouldn't you? Naaa....not on my watch. Way too many people read (but not post in) this forum to not use it as a platform to discuss, educate and hopefully convert casual viewers.

Oh, where to begin. There are plenty of adult Paul supporters on the forum that actually took a history class or two, and passed. The fact that you keep making incorrect references, then try to bash others for being asleep in their history class, has kinda ruined it for you. If you are going to "exercise your freedom" every night, maybe you should give yourself a posting cut off time, before your lucidity is too impaired.

If you think you are converting people to Paul with your posts, you're doing it wrong.