GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2012, 01:34   #1
rick458
USS Texas BB-35
 
rick458's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: La Porte Texas
Posts: 6,793
Bible translations

What is your favorite translation?
and
Which do you consider the Most accurate/faithful?

I have read NIV, and New KJV, but I find that the original
King James Version seem to speak to me the best, the other two translations seem TOO soft, too watered down.

Bearing fully in mind that I do not speak or read Hebrew, Aramaec, or Latin, so I have to take what translations I have read on faith and with discernment.
__________________
SemperFi My Brothers
"Never pass up a good opportunity to keep your mouth shut" Winston Churchhill
rick458 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 06:32   #2
FCoulter
Senior Member
 
FCoulter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 986
http://originalbiblerestored.com/
FCoulter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 10:46   #3
Brucev
Senior Member
 
Brucev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,189
Once upon a time I went to seminary. There I majored in Biblical Languages... i.e., Hebrew and Greek. There I developed a very healthy appreciation of the fine English translations that are now so commonly available. For the Old Testament, I very much prefer the Revised Standard Version. For the New Testament, I very much prefer the New American Standard. They are about the best. Further, in Greek word order is important. The NASV is sufficiently close that one can use it for a "pony" when translating. As to "faithful and accurate," I prize literal translation. But, no translation is made absent the mind of the translator. I use the RSV and NASV as basic study tools. I use other sources to help me grasp the text in its context. For devotional reading I consider The Message by Eugene Peterson to be very useful.
Brucev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 11:08   #4
Roering
Sorting nuts
 
Roering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by rick458 View Post
What is your favorite translation?
and
Which do you consider the Most accurate/faithful?

I have read NIV, and New KJV, but I find that the original
King James Version seem to speak to me the best, the other two translations seem TOO soft, too watered down.

Bearing fully in mind that I do not speak or read Hebrew, Aramaec, or Latin, so I have to take what translations I have read on faith and with discernment.
I've grown up in my faith as a NIV man. I love to hear the KJV but I'm not crazy about reading it (too many thee's & thou's for my taste).

I have recently switched to the RSV-CE. It is a fantastic translation. Closer to a transliteration than the NIV but it still reads well. Interestingly enough the old English is only present at certain times such as when one is speaking/praying to God. I'm only up to the 2nd book of Samuel with this translation but so far I like it.

The CE stands for Catholic Edition meaning it includes all of the books (Deutero-Cannonical) but there are non Catholic versions as well.

As for the most accurate or faithful.....well, that's going to bring out a whole lot of opinions but really it comes down to a trade off when it comes to us non Hebrew/Greek speaking folk. You could go for extreme accuracy and get something closer to a transliteration which will read like it is in broken English or sacrifice a little accuracy to get a translation which reads well into our modern English.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------
Warranty voiding

Never buy vegan tacos from a chick with longer armpit hair than yourself. - Woofie
Roering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 16:53   #5
teumessian_fox
She's right.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Running from the Big Dog
Posts: 1,846
The NIV isn't a translation. It's a paraphrase. But it reads well.

The KJV is majestic, but incorrectly translated in some places so as to make it questionable. Acts 12:4, for example, translates pascha as Easter. Easter is never used in the Bible and the correct translation for pascha is Passover.

The NKJV is pretty good except it has nothing to do with the King James Version. It was published by a Lebanese businessman who decided to make a completely new translation, but wanted the title to include King James so as to broaden its market appeal.

The ASV is the most accurate translation available, but it is so accurate/precise, it's sometimes difficult to read. (Greek doesn't always translate literally into English. I too studied Greek in college.)

The RSV is accurate, but conservatives call into question the translation of "young woman" for "virgin" in Isaiah 7:14. In actuality, either is correct and in no way minimizes the "messianic" nature of the Isaiah prophecies.

The Living Bible is, as far as translations go, a joke.

I use a wide margin Cambridge King James Bible for my personal studies, but only because I've already made so many notes I'd hate to start over. If I were going to start afresh, I'd probably go with the NKJV, but I use all versions (except the NIV and/or the LB).

Last edited by teumessian_fox; 03-07-2012 at 16:55..
teumessian_fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 19:38   #6
Green_Manelishi
Knicker Knotter
 
Green_Manelishi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: On the edge but not quite over ...
Posts: 6,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by teumessian_fox View Post
(Greek doesn't always translate literally into English. I too studied Greek in college.)
I suspect there are many languages that don't well translate into English.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Green_Manelishi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 20:18   #7
rgregoryb
Sapere aude
 
rgregoryb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Republic of Alabama
Posts: 12,865


Quote:
Originally Posted by FCoulter View Post
your translation? how convenient
__________________
"I don't know why we are here, but I'm pretty sure that it is not in order to enjoy ourselves."
Ludwig Wittgenstein

"demography is destiny"
rgregoryb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 20:55   #8
Tilley
Man of Steel
 
Tilley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 3,161
The NIV has had the most exhaustive work in terms of scholarships, time and money put into it. A newest version is said to have just come out.

My next favorite is the New Living Translation. It is a paraphrase, but if you compare it to the NIV, it is very close to it and is easier to read.
Tilley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 21:25   #9
Vic Hays
Senior Member
 
Vic Hays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: My home is in heaven
Posts: 11,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilley View Post
The NIV has had the most exhaustive work in terms of scholarships, time and money put into it. A newest version is said to have just come out.

My next favorite is the New Living Translation. It is a paraphrase, but if you compare it to the NIV, it is very close to it and is easier to read.
The NIV is somewhat of a paraphrase also. It is a "dynamic translation" according to the translators. This means that they were not as accurate with the literal translation and tried to make it fit what they thought was the meaning.

I like the New King James personally. The King James is the Bible that I have in my memory though and I like the taste of the language used in it.

Psalm 34:8 O taste and see that the LORD is good: blessed is the man that trusteth in him.
__________________
Vic Hays

John 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.

Last edited by Vic Hays; 03-08-2012 at 21:29..
Vic Hays is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:18.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,187
305 Members
882 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31