Originally Posted by bac1023
Do you have experience with HK?
If not, how can you justify it one way or another?
I understand what you all are saying. Maybe it because I started using Glock in the early '90's for CC. I have owned many guns before Glock, not HK though. That being said, My Glock pistols have never misfired after thousands of rounds at the ranges. I now carry a Glock 27 Gen4, but just ordered the new hybrid Glock 30S. 10 rounds of 45 ACP standard mag and will use the Glock 21, 13 round mag. for backup. I paid $649. I can't in my mind justify paying more than twice the price for an HK. The mechanics are different in the HK, and I don't like the idea of an external safety. Please don't think I'm flaming HK here, just expressing my opinion on why I chose Glock. I guess I'm old school, "DON'T FIX WHAT AIN'T BROKE." I hear the HK is a fabulous gun.