GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-08-2013, 13:40   #1
MaxxAction
Senior Member
 
MaxxAction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 4,547
What do you guys make of this??


Charlotte NC man arrested for filming military drill on public property.

Evidently, this was a training operation that was open to the public, and the cop in question got a little over zealous and arrested a guy for filming it.

So, from a LEO perspective, why does this sort of thing seem to be repeating itself so frequently? This sort of thing being a seeming phobia over video cameras and being videoed.

I was just curious what some of the more experienced LEO's thought.
__________________
Will Wrestle You For Food
MaxxAction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 13:47   #2
DaBigBR
No Infidels!
 
DaBigBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Circling the wagons.
Posts: 15,924
Unless I'm missing something, there is no audio, no accompanying news article, police press release, or anything else. For what criminal offense was he arrested? There is absolutely nothing in the video or post that can be used to make any kind of assessment.
__________________
"Logic is rarely the engine that propels a police department forward."

-David Simon in "Homicide"
DaBigBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 14:01   #3
Patchman
Florist
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Land of Flora, Fauna & Merriweather
Posts: 13,438
If this was a military exercise open to the public, then why was that military guy asking him to leave?

Was he standing in the middle of the staging area (his video showed it was an open area, and referred to as a "park"), and thus posing a hazard for himself as well as the military participants?

Maxx, what else are you intentionally leaving out AGAIN?
__________________
Although many good citizens own and carry guns, keeping communities safe still fall on those who carry badges.

In a gunfight, even if you do everything right, you can still get killed.

Last edited by Patchman; 07-08-2013 at 14:06..
Patchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 14:12   #4
DaBigBR
No Infidels!
 
DaBigBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Circling the wagons.
Posts: 15,924
Got my sound working...flash update.

Clear cut criminal trespass case. He wasn't supposed to be where he was, he was told to leave, and he refused. The fact that the property is owned by a governmental body and "public property" does not make it impossible to trespass upon it. Idiot.
__________________
"Logic is rarely the engine that propels a police department forward."

-David Simon in "Homicide"
DaBigBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 14:45   #5
Ohio Cop
Senior Member
 
Ohio Cop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The Rust Belt.
Posts: 4,780
Public property is usually owned by the jurisdiction the officer is working for, such as a CITY park. If you're told to leave because yore trespassing for one reason or another and you don't; that's criminal trespass.

Did without privilege to do so enter or remain on the land of another.


We need to arrest every jerkoff who wants I be a YouTube sensation and hit them with everything they can. Maybe then they'll process te fact that they're wrong.

Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
Quote:
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do.

Benjamin Franklin
Quote:
Just being a federally "prohibited person" who owns guns and signatures about them on the internet should be enough to keep him paranoid."

Last edited by Ohio Cop; 07-08-2013 at 14:45..
Ohio Cop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 15:36   #6
Top_Shot_31
Senior Member
 
Top_Shot_31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 420
Criminal Trespass.

From my state:

TRESPASS DEFINED.
1. The term "property" shall include any land, dwelling,
building, conveyance, vehicle, or other temporary or permanent
structure whether publicly or privately owned.
2. The term "trespass" shall mean one or more of the
following acts:
a. Entering upon or in property without the express
permission of the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession with
the intent to commit a public offense, to use, remove therefrom,
alter, damage, harass, or place thereon or therein anything animate
or inanimate, or to hunt, fish or trap on or in the property,
including the act of taking or attempting to take a deer, other than
a farm deer as defined in section 170.1 or preserve whitetail as
defined in section 484C.1, which is on or in the property by a person
who is outside the property. This paragraph does not prohibit the
unarmed pursuit of game or fur-bearing animals by a person who
lawfully injured or killed the game or fur-bearing animal which comes
to rest on or escapes to the property of another.
b. Entering or remaining upon or in property without
justification after being notified or requested to abstain from
entering or to remove or vacate therefrom by the owner, lessee, or
person in lawful possession, or the agent or employee of the owner,
lessee, or person in lawful possession, or by any peace officer,
magistrate, or public employee whose duty it is to supervise the use
or maintenance of the property.

c. Entering upon or in property for the purpose or with the
effect of unduly interfering with the lawful use of the property by
others.
d. Being upon or in property and wrongfully using, removing
therefrom, altering, damaging, harassing, or placing thereon or
therein anything animate or inanimate, without the implied or actual
permission of the owner, lessee, or person in lawful possession.
e. Entering or remaining upon or in railway property without
lawful authority or without the consent of the railway corporation
which owns, leases, or operates the railway property. This paragraph
does not apply to passage over a railroad right-of-way, other than a
track, railroad roadbed, viaduct, bridge, trestle, or railroad yard,
by an unarmed person if the person has not been notified or requested
to abstain from entering on to the right-of-way or to vacate the
right-of-way and the passage over the right-of-way does not interfere
with the operation of the railroad.
3. The term "trespass" shall not mean entering upon the
property of another for the sole purpose of retrieving personal
property which has accidentally or inadvertently been thrown, fallen,
strayed, or blown onto the property of another, provided that the
person retrieving the property takes the most direct and accessible
route to and from the property to be retrieved, quits the property as
quickly as is possible, and does not unduly interfere with the lawful
use of the property.
4. The term "trespass" does not mean the entering upon the
right-of-way of a public road or highway.
5. For purposes of this section, "railway property" means all
tangible real and personal property owned, leased, or operated by a
railway corporation with the exception of any administrative building
or offices of the railway corporation.
For purposes of this section, "railway corporation" means a
corporation, company, or person owning, leasing, or operating any
railroad in whole or in part within this state.
6. This section shall not apply to the following persons:
a. Representatives of the state department of transportation,
the federal railroad administration, or the national transportation
safety board who enter or remain upon or in railway property while
engaged in the performance of official duties.
b. Employees of a railway corporation who enter or remain
upon or in railway property while acting in the course of employment.

c. Any person who is engaged in the operation of a lawful
business on railway station grounds or in the railway depot.

Emphasis mine. Similarly worded in probably any State Code.
__________________
Quote:
Fast forward 6 months for the DUI trial. Prosecutor is reviewing the booking room video and asks me why I am moon-walking while the drunk offender is hopping around in slow motion in a big white suit.
Top_Shot_31 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 16:21   #7
OLY-M4gery
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 6,005
OLY-M4gery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 16:23   #8
blueiron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,602
I concur with others about the criminal trespass. He was asked to leave and refused. It is his choice to push the issue.

I attend university as a student and pay a lot of money in tuition. I also pay my share of State income taxes, some of which go to the State University system that supports my education. Even with these payments, I cannot enter the football stadium, the performing arts centers, the baseball fields, etc. when they are closed to the public.
blueiron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 16:41   #9
MaxxAction
Senior Member
 
MaxxAction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 4,547
He was evidently released without charges...

look guys, I am just trying to understand. I am not throwing rocks.

There have been numerous arrests for people filming in public places. There is an old guy (mid sixties) in another town close by that was arrested for filming cops while sitting on his own front porch, and faces like 13 years in prison for it, and never been in trouble in his life. They are using "wire tapping" laws to justify the arrest. I just don't get why this is such a big deal.
__________________
Will Wrestle You For Food
MaxxAction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 16:47   #10
Batesmotel
Senior Member
 
Batesmotel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 13,814
I am a photographer. I know my rights when photographing. I even cary a press pass issued by the Sheriff. I know some other photographers who got busted while photographing. In all but a few cases they got busted for WHERE they were photographing. Not WHAT they were photographing.
__________________
It's smaller on the outside.
Batesmotel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 17:03   #11
blueiron
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batesmotel View Post
I know some other photographers who got busted while photographing. In all but a few cases they got busted for WHERE they were photographing. Not WHAT they were photographing.

This.

Wielding a camera as a hobbyist or as a professional brings a certain responsibility to photograph safely and with due regard for the law.

Too many believe they have an absolute Right to practice their craft and the reasonable person knows that there are no absolute Rights.
blueiron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 17:12   #12
Dukeboy01
Pretty Ladies!
 
Dukeboy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 2,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxxAction View Post
look guys, I am just trying to understand. I am not throwing rocks.
Bull****.

__________________
"You want it to be one way... but it's the other way." - Marlo Stanfield
Dukeboy01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 17:18   #13
Dukeboy01
Pretty Ladies!
 
Dukeboy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 2,649
Nice quick cuff and stuff by the officer, btw. Ask, tell, make...
__________________
"You want it to be one way... but it's the other way." - Marlo Stanfield
Dukeboy01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 17:28   #14
MaxxAction
Senior Member
 
MaxxAction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 4,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukeboy01 View Post
Bull****.


Look...

if you want to take it that way, that's your prerogative. There is a lot that goes on these days that I don't understand, instances like this would definitely qualify.
__________________
Will Wrestle You For Food
MaxxAction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2013, 17:54   #15
Ohio Cop
Senior Member
 
Ohio Cop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The Rust Belt.
Posts: 4,780
In short, another man child who can't be old no and no rules apply to him.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
Quote:
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do.

Benjamin Franklin
Quote:
Just being a federally "prohibited person" who owns guns and signatures about them on the internet should be enough to keep him paranoid."
Ohio Cop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 08:04   #16
lawman800
Juris Glocktor
 
lawman800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Out the frying pan & into the fire!
Posts: 37,951
Blog Entries: 1
Hey, this is America and he got rights!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueiron:
I've said it before and I'll say it here: they'd look better with lividity.
lawman800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 08:36   #17
Bill Lumberg
BTF Inventor
 
Bill Lumberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,548
Beat me to it. As soon as I saw the title, I thought, I could make a hat, or a brooch.........
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLY-M4gery View Post
__________________
Did someone talk to you about your TPS reports?
Bill Lumberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:04   #18
merlynusn
Senior Member
 
merlynusn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 3,316
Just going off the video... The property they are on is currently owned by the City of Charlotte. The property is a vacant mall. The property was given to the military to conduct an exercise. A military member came up to the guy and told him to leave. The guy obviously didn't so the military member got an officer who was working it to leave. To arrest for trespassing, you either have to be banned previously or you have to be told in the presence of those who own or are in control of the property to leave.

The military guy told the officer he wanted him to leave, told the guy to leave again in the officer's presence and the guy refused so they arrested him for 2nd Degree Trespassing.

You can hear in the film after he's been arrested the military guy saying "I don't care that you're filming, you are just filming from the wrong spot and it's not safe where you're standing."

It is a very clear cut 2nd Degree Trespass case.

Last edited by merlynusn; 07-09-2013 at 10:05..
merlynusn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:39   #19
MaxxAction
Senior Member
 
MaxxAction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 4,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by merlynusn View Post
Just going off the video... The property they are on is currently owned by the City of Charlotte. The property is a vacant mall. The property was given to the military to conduct an exercise. A military member came up to the guy and told him to leave. The guy obviously didn't so the military member got an officer who was working it to leave. To arrest for trespassing, you either have to be banned previously or you have to be told in the presence of those who own or are in control of the property to leave.

The military guy told the officer he wanted him to leave, told the guy to leave again in the officer's presence and the guy refused so they arrested him for 2nd Degree Trespassing.

You can hear in the film after he's been arrested the military guy saying "I don't care that you're filming, you are just filming from the wrong spot and it's not safe where you're standing."

It is a very clear cut 2nd Degree Trespass case.
There...

that's an answer. Thanks Merlyn.

I didn't hear the part about the guard guy telling him he didn't mind him filming.
__________________
Will Wrestle You For Food
MaxxAction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2013, 10:51   #20
merlynusn
Senior Member
 
merlynusn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 3,316
At the very beginning, you hear the military guy say "Hey officer..."

At about the 1:45 minute mark as the officer is arresting him, you can hear the military guy saying they rented it out. That would negate the argument by the defendant that it's city property and currently accessible to everyone. And if there is an authority to act as agent for the property, then he has no argument anyway.

At 3:30, you hear the military guy say "You can film and hang out all you want. I just want you..."

It's obvious that the guy started filming right before the police got involved (or has clipped the film to start then).

Here is the statute:
14‑159.13. Second degree trespass.
(a) Offense. – A person commits the offense of second degree trespass if, without authorization, he enters or remains on premises of another:
(1) After he has been notified not to enter or remain there by the owner, by a person in charge of the premises, by a lawful occupant, or by another authorized person; or
(2) That are posted, in a manner reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders, with notice not to enter the premises.
(b) Classification. – Second degree trespass is a Class 3 misdemeanor.

Last edited by merlynusn; 07-09-2013 at 10:52..
merlynusn is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:16.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,191
345 Members
846 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31