GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
View Poll Results: Is this a muscle car era?
Yes, its the new muscle era 74 52.86%
No, only the originals are true muscle cars. 66 47.14%
Voters: 140. You may not vote on this poll


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2013, 08:06   #1
Kichigai
気違い Was Mr30s
 
Kichigai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,052
Welcome to the greatest muscle car era

What do you think? Is now the greatest muscle car era? Some of the new cars are putting up big HP numbers and speed that make the old muscle cars look much slower. Don't get me wrong, I love old american muscle and restored a 67 RS/SS camaro big block but it is hard to ignore the numbers and performance.

http://autos.yahoo.com/news/welcome-...160000076.html
Kichigai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:12   #2
Batesmotel
Senior Member
 
Batesmotel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 76 Totters Ln. London
Posts: 13,340
Hands down the best cars are made today. Just the refinements in handling make a difference. My wife has a 66 mustang. It is a great car but after a day of hard driving I an worn out. It is fatiguing to drive the older cars compared to the new ones.
__________________
It's smaller on the outside.
Batesmotel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:22   #3
HerrGlock
CLM Number 2
Scouts Out
 
HerrGlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64,487


My every day driver is a Hemi Charger. Yeah, I'm liking this throw back stuff.
__________________
Sent from my rotary phone
"The way I see it as soon as a baby is born, he should be issued a banjo!"- Linus Van Pelt
UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins any more
HerrGlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:24   #4
The Hawk
Senior Member
 
The Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: LaGrange, Ky
Posts: 1,170
I agree. Not only can you get high HP straight from dealership, but mpg is up as well.
The Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:27   #5
Kichigai
気違い Was Mr30s
 
Kichigai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hawk View Post
I agree. Not only can you get high HP straight from dealership, but mpg is up as well.
This is true and FAR higher reliability
Kichigai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:31   #6
ArtyGuy
Senior Member
 
ArtyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 926
It is hard to debate the numbers of today (thanks to technology not available previously). I do love the current Camaro (I talk myself out of buying one at least once every two weeks) but I still gravitate to the older muscle cars. I just think they look so damn cool.
__________________
The King puts the balls where the Queen wants them.
ArtyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:35   #7
69HEMI-R/T
Senior Member
 
69HEMI-R/T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Mexico/S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,079
the main problem with today's musclecars is cost! Yeah, NEW musclecars were relatively expensive back in the old days but a 2 to 3 year old car was certainly cheap enough and you could work on them yourself.
Today's musclecars are certainly better in almost every way compared to the original musclecars of the past but how many do you see in teenage of early '20 year old hands with someone "souping" them up in their driveway?

To Herrglock: If you drive one of those new 4-DOOR cars Dodge foolishly calls a "Charger" , It ain't a Charger! Chargers were only made with 2 doors! Here is a REAL Hemicharger!

The Okie Corral

The Okie Corral
__________________
YEAH , IT'S GOT A HEMI..BACK OFF!!
69HEMI-R/T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:38   #8
HerrGlock
CLM Number 2
Scouts Out
 
HerrGlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 64,487


Quote:
Originally Posted by 69HEMI-R/T View Post
To Herrglock: If you drive one of those new 4-DOOR cars Dodge foolishly calls a "Charger" , It ain't a Charger! Chargers were only made with 2 doors! Here is a REAL Hemicharger!
How silly of me. It had a Dodge sticker price on it, says Hemi on the engine, has Charger markings on it. You're right, I'm sure it's a Pinto.

I had a '71 Duster and yeah, I'm old enough that kids my age had the late '60s/early '70s cars in HS and college. I like my current Charger better than pretty much any pony or muscle car I grew up with.
__________________
Sent from my rotary phone
"The way I see it as soon as a baby is born, he should be issued a banjo!"- Linus Van Pelt
UNIX - Not just for Vestal Virgins any more

Last edited by HerrGlock; 06-26-2013 at 08:40..
HerrGlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 08:46   #9
M&P15T
Beard One
 
M&P15T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 10,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69HEMI-R/T View Post
......a 2 to 3 year old car was certainly cheap enough and you could work on them yourself.....but how many do you see in teenage of early '20 year old hands with someone "souping" them up in their driveway?
Current muscle cars are even easier to work on.

Long-tube headers, performance cats, axle-back exhaust, X and H pipes, intake/CAI systems, are all very easy to install. If I added a super-charger and up-graded fuel injectors (or any other combo of performance up-grades), tuning the engine is simply a matter of having Bamatunes e-mail me the proper tune, and me loading it into the car.

Hell, I could have one of 9 different tunes on my car in 10 or so minutes from now.

Then there are all of the suspension, wheel & tire, and brake system up-grades, plus the usual LSDs and drive-shafts and such.

And sorry to say, but 20 somethings are not anymore likely to have a real muscle car now, than they were back in the 1960s. It's not a question of age, but money.

Modern cars are actually very easy to work on. The death of the carb has been a blessing, with tuning a car to run correctly with after-market up-grades a simple matter of a down-load.
The Okie Corral
__________________
Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (519 BC – 430 BC) Power should only be given to those that want it least.

Last edited by M&P15T; 06-26-2013 at 09:16..
M&P15T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 09:05   #10
Kichigai
気違い Was Mr30s
 
Kichigai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtyGuy View Post
It is hard to debate the numbers of today (thanks to technology not available previously). I do love the current Camaro (I talk myself out of buying one at least once every two weeks) but I still gravitate to the older muscle cars. I just think they look so damn cool.
I am with you
Kichigai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 09:14   #11
Cashgap
Senior Member
 
Cashgap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 1,010
Actually, performance is cheaper now than "back in the day".

1968 Hemi Charger sticker was $4,821. That's $32,271 in 2013 dollars. Easy to beat the Charger in every category for that price today.

And you'll have a faster car that handles so much better, is so much safer, more reliable, easier to repair, holds value better, etc.

But I also like the vibe of the '60s vehicles. You look at something that was built with all the structural integrity and attention to detail of a food truck burrito, and people drove 'em like they were rockets!!!

Last edited by Cashgap; 06-26-2013 at 09:17..
Cashgap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 09:32   #12
Bill Powell
CLM Number F
Cross Member
 
Bill Powell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: dallas, tx
Posts: 9,001
Blog Entries: 23
Oh, I don't know. I bought a 68 Dodge Dart 340 six pack and 4 speed, It would run right at 12 flat in the quarter in the mid teens. The front end was loose so it cornered kind of twitchy. I paid 175 dollars for it.
__________________
Stoicism is nothing to get excited about....
Bill Powell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 09:32   #13
Kichigai
気違い Was Mr30s
 
Kichigai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Florida
Posts: 2,052
I should have made this a poll so that people could vote on old vs new muscle car
Kichigai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 09:34   #14
M&P15T
Beard One
 
M&P15T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 10,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Powell View Post
Oh, I don't know. I bought a 68 Dodge Dart 340 six pack and 4 speed, It would run right at 12 flat in the quarter in the mid teens. The front end was loose so it cornered kind of twitchy. I paid 175 dollars for it.
Please share the details of the rear suspension, rear end gearing, wheels and tires, and transmission.

Plus, whatever was done to the engine, and power out-put.

I ask because, stock, 1968 340 Darts were 15.2 second 1/4 mile cars. So, unless the car you're speaking of had some serious power and traction improvements, the 1/4 mile times you've quoted are incorrect.

Hell, the 440 GTSs only did 13.3 second 1/4 mile times.
__________________
Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (519 BC – 430 BC) Power should only be given to those that want it least.

Last edited by M&P15T; 06-26-2013 at 09:49..
M&P15T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 11:26   #15
Cashgap
Senior Member
 
Cashgap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Music City, USA
Posts: 1,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&P15T View Post
Please share the details of the rear suspension, rear end gearing, wheels and tires, and transmission.

Plus, whatever was done to the engine, and power out-put.

I ask because, stock, 1968 340 Darts were 15.2 second 1/4 mile cars. So, unless the car you're speaking of had some serious power and traction improvements, the 1/4 mile times you've quoted are incorrect.

Hell, the 440 GTSs only did 13.3 second 1/4 mile times.
You forgot to consider... Memory drops about .1 sec ET and adds about a MPH to top end every year, in my experience.
Cashgap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 11:38   #16
Glockdude1
CLM Number 185
Federal Member
 
Glockdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Beaumont,Texas
Posts: 27,011


Quote:
Originally Posted by 69HEMI-R/T View Post
the main problem with today's musclecars is cost! Yeah, NEW musclecars were relatively expensive back in the old days but a 2 to 3 year old car was certainly cheap enough and you could work on them yourself.
Today's musclecars are certainly better in almost every way compared to the original musclecars of the past but how many do you see in teenage of early '20 year old hands with someone "souping" them up in their driveway?

To Herrglock: If you drive one of those new 4-DOOR cars Dodge foolishly calls a "Charger" , It ain't a Charger! Chargers were only made with 2 doors! Here is a REAL Hemicharger!

The Okie Corral

The Okie Corral
__
__________________
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs."
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Glockdude1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 11:42   #17
DanaT
Pharaoh
 
DanaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CO & Baden –Württemberg
Posts: 16,699
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cashgap View Post
You forgot to consider... Memory drops about .1 sec ET and adds about a MPH to top end every year, in my experience.


What I have seen is slightly different.

When waiting in line getting into the drag strip (i.e. before gates open) there are so many 10 second cars its shocking. The gates must be magical. Simply passing through them makes cars somewhere between 5 and 7 slower. I am not sure what causes, this, but my intuition is that the gates must have some sort of EMI that affects the tuning on the cars and damages the gasoline. Otherwise, I just can't figure out how a 10 second car only runs a 17 a few hundred feet later?
__________________
Many of the truths that we cling to depend on our point of view.
DanaT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 11:49   #18
ilgunguygt
Enslaved in IL
 
ilgunguygt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Peoples Republic Of Illinois
Posts: 4,671
Too bad average joe can barely afford one, or in many cases cant. In 1970 when the Chevrolet beast was the LS6 chevelle it was about a 3600 dollar car. Minimum wage was about 1.60 an hour then. Thats 2250 hours of work to pay for the car. Nowadays Minimum wage is 7.25 an hour and the cost of the top performing camaro is well above 40k. Your 7.25 wage when applied to the previous 2250 hours required to pay for the chevelle comes up to less than 17k.

Yes, the cars are faster but the average joe that used to buy them cant afford to anymore.
__________________
***RIP Okie, GT will never be the same without you Mr Mayor!***
ilgunguygt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 13:24   #19
BigMoneyGrip
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oxford, MS
Posts: 510
The new "muscle cars" are nice, but the real ones had big blocks.
Attached Thumbnails
The Okie Corral - Click for larger version  
BigMoneyGrip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2013, 13:27   #20
M&P15T
Beard One
 
M&P15T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 10,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMoneyGrip View Post
The new "muscle cars" are nice, but the real ones had big blocks.
You mean "original ones".....
__________________
Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (519 BC – 430 BC) Power should only be given to those that want it least.
M&P15T is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:18.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,147
323 Members
824 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42