GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2013, 18:00   #1
gringogigante
Senior Member
 
gringogigante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 194
Does frangible ammo have penetration problems?

I trolled the archives for info and found none. I found one recent Q&A with Mas Ayoob where he referred them as "coming up short on penetration... by some standards".

What say you, amigos?

A gun dealer buddy of mine says they are the crap for SD ammo and even carries frangible OO buck in his HD shotgun. Back in the day, I was told that frangible was not good for SD as it was almost strictly for steel shooting.

What's the new info?

thanks,

chris
__________________
Chris McCollum

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
- North Texas CHL HQ

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

CHL class Dallas, TX
CHL class Plano, TX
gringogigante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 19:41   #2
M 7
Senior Member
 
M 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by gringogigante View Post
I trolled the archives for info and found none. I found one recent Q&A with Mas Ayoob where he referred them as "coming up short on penetration... by some standards".

What say you, amigos?

A gun dealer buddy of mine says they are the crap for SD ammo and even carries frangible OO buck in his HD shotgun. Back in the day, I was told that frangible was not good for SD as it was almost strictly for steel shooting.

What's the new info?

thanks,

chris
My guess is that "coming up short on penetration" probably relates to the 12" - 18" penetration requirement (after barriers) as set forth in the FBI test protocols. No frangible ammo that I am aware of will meet those requirements.

You could always go to his GATE forum and ask Mas what he meant, too. I bet he'd be happy to clarify.
__________________
For those who CCW:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by M 7; 05-06-2013 at 19:42..
M 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2013, 21:16   #3
Ljutic
Senior Member
 
Ljutic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 149
While many have opinions, there really isn't much available in the way of factual data. I'm not disputing anyone's opinions, especially not Mas. Here are my contributions to the debate. Ultimately, we all make our own decisions on what works best for us.

DRT 380

Liberty HP 9mm Short and Long Barrel

Liberty HP 40 Short and Long Barrel

Magsafe 9mm

Still want to test the 45 Auto loads from Liberty and DRT. I have one, but am waiting on the other.
__________________
Author and solo contributor to the Pocket Guns and Gear blog.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Ljutic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2013, 21:24   #4
dkf
Senior Member
 
dkf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,444
There are two basic types of frangibles. Those designed to substitute fmj bullets and those deigned/marketed for self defense and limited penetration.

The fmj replacement frangibles act like an fmj until it hits a solid object like a steel plate.

The other frangibles for defense purposes are usually light weight and have very limited penetration. Nothing I am interested in and IMO they are gimmick rounds.
dkf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 14:47   #5
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
I hope that my CCW ammo is not frangibile. It is a 115gr 9mm bullet at 1400 FPS. I rely on penetration.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2013, 17:55   #6
pisc1024
Senior Member
 
pisc1024's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 635
This may help you.
http://m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=57072
pisc1024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2013, 12:54   #7
Darkangel1846
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,721
Wow that magsafe 9 defender did a job on tha gel.
__________________
Peter 5:8
"Be sober, be vigilant; Because your adversary the Devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking who he may devour."
Darkangel1846 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2013, 13:55   #8
DocGKR
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 86
I thought the Magsafe 9 mm offered inadequate penetration. In addition, it has poor intermediate barrier penetration capability.
DocGKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2013, 08:34   #9
Jim S.
Senior Member
 
Jim S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 4,758
I think it would depend on what type of clothing a bad guy may be wearing.
A T shirt won't even matter to a frangible round.
A heavy leather jacket with a couple of layers underneath might make that frangible a very shallow penetrator.
Wouldn't want to be the test subject but I prefer a round that will penetrate more than what they say a frangible will.
They may be a good idea in a home where there are family members present but I would only load a couple of rounds and then have the heavy stuff coming out next.
On the streets there are so many variables and possibilities that I prefer something that can shoot through a garbage can or something light like that and not turn into a dust cloud.
__________________
The Evil Captain Kirk
Jim S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2013, 09:24   #10
plp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 529
I realize many of you are dismissive of the .380 ACP round in general, but dayum that was impressive compared to most clear gel ballistics tests I've seen of both FMJ and HP in that caliber.
plp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2013, 09:38   #11
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by plp View Post
I realize many of you are dismissive of the .380 ACP round in general, but dayum that was impressive compared to most clear gel ballistics tests I've seen of both FMJ and HP in that caliber.
I'd carry a .380 if I had to, but my 9mm is my top choice. G17.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2013, 12:27   #12
walt cowan
Senior Member
 
walt cowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: absurdistan
Posts: 9,999
The Boston swat team used that on the boat the kid was hiding in. Shot more rounds into that thing than a a-team rerun.
__________________
the nsa was the first to read this post. eric was the second.
walt cowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2013, 11:43   #13
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by walt cowan View Post
The Boston swat team used that on the boat the kid was hiding in. Shot more rounds into that thing than a a-team rerun.
Is that kid on trial yet?
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2013, 11:46   #14
unit1069
Senior Member
 
unit1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Central US
Posts: 8,593
Quote:
Does frangible ammo have penetration problems?
Yes, if one is using frangible for self-defense.

I'd use FMJ before I'd use frangible ammo for self-defense.
__________________
Rocket Scientist
unit1069 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 05:32   #15
walt cowan
Senior Member
 
walt cowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: absurdistan
Posts: 9,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
Is that kid on trial yet?
no show trial yet. the writers are still working on that script and several more are in the pipe.
__________________
the nsa was the first to read this post. eric was the second.
walt cowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 05:34   #16
walt cowan
Senior Member
 
walt cowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: absurdistan
Posts: 9,999
one hole in and one out are better than a nasty looking sallow hole.
__________________
the nsa was the first to read this post. eric was the second.
walt cowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 05:36   #17
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by walt cowan View Post
no show trial yet. the writers are still working on that script and several more are in the pipe.
Thanks!
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 06:28   #18
Breadman03
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Luzerne County, PA
Posts: 1,774
Send a message via Skype™ to Breadman03
If I lived in an apartment building, frangible ammo would probably be my first choice for a HD gun. I have kids and a few neighbors, but most of my likely lines of fire are clear.

It's all about compromising and finding the compromises that best meet your needs and concerns.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Wants a G41
Breadman03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 10:26   #19
fastbolt
Senior Member
 
fastbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Within the lightning (Northern CA)
Posts: 9,664
Frangible ammunition is made for specific purposes.

Now, if someone has unrealistic expectations for it, using it in a role for which it wasn't designed, that might become a "problem" regarding how they intend to use it.
__________________
Sub Club #9; .40 S&W Club #1953; S&W Club #3913
Retired LE - firearms instructor/armorer
fastbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 20:54   #20
mikegun
Senior Member
 
mikegun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: colorado
Posts: 4,071
frangablo ammo sucks...
__________________
RIP K9 Fant, K9 Flambo. Loyal ,trusted partners.
mikegun is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:03.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,259
363 Members
896 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42