[glock2740]

Originally Posted by mjkeat

LOL, yes it's my "patheticness" that has put me in this hole of stupidity.

See, we can finally agree on something.

[mjkeat]

Originally Posted by glock2740

See, we can finally agree on something.

You're so dense you can't even pick up on the sarcasm.

[glock2740]

The truth is, that you're so "dense" (I'll be nice) that you don't pick up on ANYTHING. If only you had one single person to agree with you about the nothingness that you've spewed throughout this entire thread...? But, there are none. Nada. El zippo. Kinda says it all...... I'm tired of batting you around like a cat batting around a play toy. You're a fool and a complete idiot. Not only have I and countless others proven that fact, you have been the best proof of that by your own words. You are the kind of gun owner that I can understand the anti's wanting to have guns taken out of your hands. You give the rest of us a bad name. Thank God, that the lib anti's don't have much access to your posts, as they would be used against us all. I've had my fun with you, at your expense, and now you've become tiresome to me. You're a sad and pathetic little man/boy and I feel 10 IQ points dumber now, just by having had so many interactions with you. Good luck. You're gonna need it.

[jcbarlow]

Originally Posted by mjkeat

There are some sites full of real shooters. You'll find that those sites don't allow people to make claims of fact w/o supporting evidence.

Please go there and leave us alone.

Sent from my Galaxy Note 2 using Tapatalk

[BenjiEDF]

Originally Posted by mjkeat

LOL, yes it's my "patheticness" that has put me in this hole of stupidity.

[bac1023]

Mike, you really are a troll for the ages.

Common facts about firearms that already took place over a century ago, DON'T need friggen "supporting evidence". How damn dense can you possibly be? How damn stupid do you want to sound?

Supporting evidence is needed when somebody wants to prove a new point or theory. Its NOT needed when one is merely reciting things that took place many, many years ago that can very easily be researched.

I asked you once to explain to me where it ends and you failed to do so. If I state that Thomas Jefferson was our 3rd President. Does that need supporting evidence? How is that any different than saying the 9mm round was developed for the Luger? Where does it stop? ANSWER the question this time instead of ignoring it.

You're an empty barrel Mike. You fail to make any sense whatsoever.

[mjkeat]

Originally Posted by bac1023

Mike, you really are a troll for the ages.

Common facts about firearms that already took place over a century ago, DON'T need friggen "supporting evidence". How damn dense can you possibly be? How damn stupid do you want to sound?

Supporting evidence is needed when somebody wants to prove a new point or theory. Its NOT needed when one is merely reciting things that took place many, many years ago that can very easily be researched.

I asked you once to explain to me where it ends and you failed to do so. If I state that Thomas Jefferson was our 3rd President. Does that need supporting evidence? How is that any different than saying the 9mm round was developed for the Luger? Where does it stop? ANSWER the question this time instead of ignoring it.

You're an empty barrel Mike. You fail to make any sense whatsoever.

The burden of proof falls on the one making a claim, period. A claim of fact w/o proof is an "empty barrel."

If it's "common facts" it should be easy to provide a link.

It's NOT needed? Common facts? Says who? You? That equates to what?

So how about the 45 and 38 Super?

[mjkeat]

Originally Posted by glock2740

The truth is, that you're so "dense" (I'll be nice) that you don't pick up on ANYTHING. If only you had one single person to agree with you about the nothingness that you've spewed throughout this entire thread...? But, there are none. Nada. El zippo. Kinda says it all...... I'm tired of batting you around like a cat batting around a play toy. You're a fool and a complete idiot. Not only have I and countless others proven that fact, you have been the best proof of that by your own words. You are the kind of gun owner that I can understand the anti's wanting to have guns taken out of your hands. You give the rest of us a bad name. Thank God, that the lib anti's don't have much access to your posts, as they would be used against us all. I've had my fun with you, at your expense, and now you've become tiresome to me. You're a sad and pathetic little man/boy and I feel 10 IQ points dumber now, just by having had so many interactions with you. Good luck. You're gonna need it.

LOL, kinda like "patheticness" right?

I don't make personal attacks very often but you are the epitome of ignorant. The kinda of stupid that will label others while he himself is the gold standard of the insult he is spewing.

Doing your state proud there. Strengthening stereotypes.

[wjv]

Browning

[BenjiEDF]

Originally Posted by mjkeat

The burden of proof falls on the one making a claim, period. A claim of fact w/o proof is an "empty barrel."

If it's "common facts" it should be easy to provide a link.

It's NOT needed? Common facts? Says who? You? That equates to what?

So how about the 45 and 38 Super?

"John Browning had already been developing a semi-auto pistol for Colt designed around a .38-caliber cartridge similar to the .38 Super. For a genius like Browning, it wasn’t too difficult a task to upsize both the pistol and cartridge to .45 caliber."

http://www.americanrifleman.org/arti...-1911-history/

Bac1023 is correct,

In less than 30 seconds by searching for this "proof" that you keep whining about here it is. So can you stop with the willful ignorance now. There is no knowledge without action bud you aren't going to learn by osmosis and it certainly isn't the responsibility others to spoon feed you info.

[faawrenchbndr]

Other than all the quotes,.....the thread is a hell of a lot more
peaceful with Mike on the ignore list.

[bac1023]

Originally Posted by faawrenchbndr

Other than all the quotes,.....the thread is a hell of a lot more
peaceful with Mike on the ignore list.

Greg, I never once used the ignore feature in all my time on GT. However, Mike might become the first.