Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2013, 17:50   #21
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 7,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by daddysnapmuffins View Post
FN won't be able to sell AR-15s to civilians. I believe it is part of the contract. But good for FN, they make quality products. Every M16 I've ever held is FN.
Not sure how such a stipulation could be put on FN when it wasn't enforced on Colt or Sabre (before Sabre went TU), and I doubt Remington was going to give up it's civilian AR line just to get the military contract.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
WoodenPlank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 19:35   #22
daddysnapmuffins
Senior Member
 
daddysnapmuffins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodenPlank View Post
Not sure how such a stipulation could be put on FN when it wasn't enforced on Colt or Sabre (before Sabre went TU), and I doubt Remington was going to give up it's civilian AR line just to get the military contract.
I think it has to do with Colt owning the TDP. My research indicates that any company not named Colt that takes up an M4 contract with the military can't sell to civilians. Sabre I don't think even got one out of the factory.
daddysnapmuffins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 19:40   #23
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 7,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by daddysnapmuffins View Post
I think it has to do with Colt owning the TDP. My research indicates that any company not named Colt that takes up an M4 contract with the military can't sell to civilians. Sabre I don't think even got one out of the factory.
I'd be interested to see where that info is coming from. All of that just seems awfully odd to me.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
WoodenPlank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 20:58   #24
daddysnapmuffins
Senior Member
 
daddysnapmuffins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodenPlank View Post
I'd be interested to see where that info is coming from. All of that just seems awfully odd to me.
Grant from GR Tactical. Check M4carbine.net.
Flip through the pages here. Grant usually has a pretty good idea of what's what. http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=113928&page=7

Last edited by daddysnapmuffins; 02-24-2013 at 21:40..
daddysnapmuffins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 00:10   #25
fnfalman
Chicks Dig It
 
fnfalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: California & New Mexico, US
Posts: 57,735


Quote:
Originally Posted by daddysnapmuffins View Post
I think it has to do with Colt owning the TDP. My research indicates that any company not named Colt that takes up an M4 contract with the military can't sell to civilians. Sabre I don't think even got one out of the factory.
How can Colt own the TDP when the US Army Board of Ordnance contracted them to develop the M4 and M4A1 in the first place?
__________________
Can you dig it?

Last edited by fnfalman; 02-25-2013 at 00:11..
fnfalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 00:13   #26
fnfalman
Chicks Dig It
 
fnfalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: California & New Mexico, US
Posts: 57,735


Quote:
Originally Posted by daddysnapmuffins View Post
FN won't be able to sell AR-15s to civilians. I believe it is part of the contract. But good for FN, they make quality products. Every M16 I've ever held is FN.
Of course they can't sell M16A2s to civilians. However, I doubt that there is an issue of them making a semiauto version and sell it. It's not like Beretta isn't doing the same with the M9 pistol.
__________________
Can you dig it?
fnfalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 01:03   #27
countsk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 190
We have a mix of FN M-16A2s and Colt M-4s in my current unit. I'm looking forward to the M-4A1's fielding. I haven't fired a full auto rifle/carbine since the M-16A1s and that has been a few years.
countsk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 04:44   #28
daddysnapmuffins
Senior Member
 
daddysnapmuffins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
How can Colt own the TDP when the US Army Board of Ordnance contracted them to develop the M4 and M4A1 in the first place?
I really don't know the ins and outs of it but Colt at some point owned the rights to the TDP. They bought IP from Armalite. The Army contacted them to develop the M4 but Colt still created it. The Army set standards and Colt created a product to meet them. Whether FN makes the M4 and M4A1 or the contract gets pieced out among several companies, they would pay royalties to Colt on each rifle just as FN has on the M16.
daddysnapmuffins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 07:49   #29
KalashniKEV
Senior Member
 
KalashniKEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NoVA
Posts: 5,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
How can Colt own the TDP when the US Army Board of Ordnance contracted them to develop the M4 and M4A1 in the first place?
Quote:
Originally Posted by daddysnapmuffins View Post
I really don't know the ins and outs of it but Colt at some point owned the rights to the TDP. They bought IP from Armalite. The Army contacted them to develop the M4 but Colt still created it. The Army set standards and Colt created a product to meet them. Whether FN makes the M4 and M4A1 or the contract gets pieced out among several companies, they would pay royalties to Colt on each rifle just as FN has on the M16.
This.

Colt owns the TDP. If Colt wins the contract, they earn their fee on each rifle produced, if Colt loses the contract (which they did), they get their royalties on each rifle produced via second-source.

Read up on it below, especially the comically stupid behavior of NSWC Crane in improperly disclosing the M4 TDP while trying to buy... an M4 simunitions kit.

Short version- US Army Rock Island gave the Navy a copy of the M4 Addendum to the TDP (Colt's Secret Sauce/ Coke Formula) and they attached it to a solicitation and blasted it out to 21 of Colt's competitors...



20 of them returned the TDP and signed docs stating, "I didn't see nothing..."

The 21st was Fabrique Nationale- who instead of signing the paper returned a random unsolicited bid to produce M4s to the specs that were leaked for less money.



The hilarity goes on as Colt jacked their prices from $521 to $912 for a stripped base gun after the war kicked off, and then eventually $1,221 for a kitted M4.

Those were the good old days...

http://www.pepperlaw.com/publication...ArticleKey=198

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/...etition-06942/
KalashniKEV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 09:37   #30
fnfalman
Chicks Dig It
 
fnfalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: California & New Mexico, US
Posts: 57,735


Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
The hilarity goes on as Colt jacked their prices from $521 to $912 for a stripped base gun after the war kicked off, and then eventually $1,221 for a kitted M4.

Those were the good old days...
Inflation sure had gone up a bit. I remembered when I went through the US Army armorer's course, we were shown that an M16A2 costed Uncle Sam $135. Of course this was probably back in 1987 or 1988, I can't remember.
__________________
Can you dig it?
fnfalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 10:04   #31
RWBlue
CLM Number 120
Mr. CISSP, CISA
 
RWBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28,809
Many of the Gov. contracts I deal with have a Small Minority Business mandated component. I would like to know if this contact mandates this also.
__________________
One day, I shall come back. Yes, I shall come back. Until then, there must be no regrets, no tears, no anxieties. Just go forward in all your beliefs and prove to me that I am not mistaken in mine.
RWBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 10:57   #32
KalashniKEV
Senior Member
 
KalashniKEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NoVA
Posts: 5,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
Inflation sure had gone up a bit.
Yes... but nothing doubled their costs in 2002. They were taking advantage of the GWOT.

I'm also pretty sure that the Military buys more ARs than Walmart, and should probably get a better price with ongoing demand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
Many of the Gov. contracts I deal with have a Small Minority Business mandated component. I would like to know if this contact mandates this also.
It is a Full and Open Solicitation.

There is likely no SB participation requirement.

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...=core&_cview=0
KalashniKEV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 10:59   #33
fnfalman
Chicks Dig It
 
fnfalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: California & New Mexico, US
Posts: 57,735


Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
Yes... but nothing doubled their costs in 2002. They were taking advantage of the GWOT.

I'm also pretty sure that the Military buys more ARs than Walmart, and should probably get a better price with ongoing demand.



It is a Full and Open Solicitation.

There is likely no SB participation requirement.

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...=core&_cview=0
The MBE/WBE/SBE/DBE requirement probably comes in under accessories like mags, slings and other non-essential stuff. So the slings are probably made from "Lighthouse For the Blind" or something like that.
__________________
Can you dig it?
fnfalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 11:22   #34
RWBlue
CLM Number 120
Mr. CISSP, CISA
 
RWBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
The MBE/WBE/SBE/DBE requirement probably comes in under accessories like mags, slings and other non-essential stuff. So the slings are probably made from "Lighthouse For the Blind" or something like that.

I was anticipating this to be the rifle and accessories.

I thought the sights were made by the "Lighthouse For the Blind".



It use to be that the magazines were made by small minority businesses. The problem was that the contract was so lucrative that the business would grow and make money for a year and then it would not qualify as a small business.
__________________
One day, I shall come back. Yes, I shall come back. Until then, there must be no regrets, no tears, no anxieties. Just go forward in all your beliefs and prove to me that I am not mistaken in mine.
RWBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 11:48   #35
KalashniKEV
Senior Member
 
KalashniKEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NoVA
Posts: 5,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
I was anticipating this to be the rifle and accessories.
No, this is a rifle contract.

This is a sling contract:
(100% SB Set Aside)

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...=core&_cview=1

This is a cleaning kit contract:
(100% SB Set Aside)

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...=core&_cview=1

etc...

Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
I thought the sights were made by the "Lighthouse For the Blind".
BUIS are made by Matech Inc., Hebron MD, 21830.

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...6378be8d62cf91

Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
It use to be that the magazines were made by small minority businesses. The problem was that the contract was so lucrative that the business would grow and make money for a year and then it would not qualify as a small business.
That's not the "problem-" that's the entire point of the SBA and it's programs.

The "problem" to some may be that it makes more sense for a company to divest itself of the most profitable business unit than break the size standard and go into full and open competition... creating two seperate qualified small businesses rather than graduating from the program and competing their next contract against Boeing, General Dynamics, ManTech, BAE, etc...

Also, I'm not sure what your hang up is on "minority owned" but there are all types of SB categories- 8(a), SDVOSB, VOSB, WOSB, HubZone, ANC, etc.

The most lucrative magazine contract in recent history went to Magpul.
KalashniKEV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 12:22   #36
RWBlue
CLM Number 120
Mr. CISSP, CISA
 
RWBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post

This is a sling contract:
(100% SB Set Aside)

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...=core&_cview=1
You have gone from an Army contract to an Airforce contract.

It all depends on how you want to set up the contract. Set aside for a separate bid or force a certain percentage to a small business as part of the larger contract. It can be done either way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
BUIS are made by Matech Inc., Hebron MD, 21830.

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...6378be8d62cf91
You missed the joke. Blind making slings is not funny, it is just work which I am sure they can do.. Blind making sights is funny. Not to say they can not do it, but it is funny in an ironic way.


Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
That's not the "problem-" that's the entire point of the SBA and it's programs.

Also, I'm not sure what your hang up is on "minority owned" but there are all types of SB categories- 8(a), SDVOSB, VOSB, WOSB, HubZone, ANC, etc.
My issue is I have seen the contract NOT go to the best product or best priced produce because the they wanted a small minority owned business to do the work.

I have also seen the contract be divided in screwy ways so it goes to the correct states.

I have also watched organizations divide and reform so they can work the system.

When you include race and sex on the forms, you create a way for people to be racist and sexist. If you eliminate all everything except for the facts....all you have is price and quality and past performance.

Or to put it a different way, If the Gov. spend the money like it was coming out of their personal pocket or their life depended on it working, they wouldn't do it like we do.
__________________
One day, I shall come back. Yes, I shall come back. Until then, there must be no regrets, no tears, no anxieties. Just go forward in all your beliefs and prove to me that I am not mistaken in mine.
RWBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 12:34   #37
AK_Stick
AAAMAD
 
AK_Stick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Alaska, again (for now)
Posts: 20,994
Send a message via AIM to AK_Stick Send a message via Yahoo to AK_Stick
Quote:
Originally Posted by countsk View Post
We have a mix of FN M-16A2s and Colt M-4s in my current unit. I'm looking forward to the M-4A1's fielding. I haven't fired a full auto rifle/carbine since the M-16A1s and that has been a few years.

Not everyone is going to M4A1's. Just specific units
__________________
Quote:
Thomas Paine:

"If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my children may have peace"
AK_Stick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 12:38   #38
DustyJacket
Gold Membership
Directiv 10-289
 
DustyJacket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Missouri, East of KC
Posts: 6,176
I wonder how their qualities compare to that Hydro-matic I carried.......
__________________
"...our quick technology allows use to indulge our deepest stupidity and tastelessness with out first thinking...."
DustyJacket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 13:49   #39
KalashniKEV
Senior Member
 
KalashniKEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NoVA
Posts: 5,791
Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
You have gone from an Army contract to an Airforce contract.
Ummm... My bad???



This is another sling contract:
(100% SB Set Aside)

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...=core&_cview=1


Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
It all depends on how you want to set up the contract. Set aside for a separate bid or force a certain percentage to a small business as part of the larger contract. It can be done either way.
All contracting authorities have different SB goals. How rigidly enforced they are depends on the Dep/Agency/Org. For a lot of them, if you don't meet your SB goals, you get less money next year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
My issue is I have seen the contract NOT go to the best product or best priced produce because the they wanted a small minority owned business to do the work.
OK... we get it, minorities...

There are also set asides for HUBZones that provide jobs for Americans in rural, or declining urban areas where they would otherwise wither away and die.

There are set asides for Service Disabled Veterans who got broken in the course of their service to Nation.

There are set asides for Woman Owned Small businesses that help women succeed.

These are just the rules of the game. Hate it or love it. Also, if you're in the game you know that competition is still just as cutthroat in these smaller pools.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
When you include race and sex on the forms, you create a way for people to be racist and sexist. If you eliminate all everything except for the facts....all you have is price and quality and past performance.
...and Technical.

The government has an "agenda" to not just pour money into the mega corporations of the military industrial complex.

They take care of Small Business in many ways (as above). This creates healthy competition in the different pools. Also, sometimes when a "graduated" lean-and-mean SB *does* make a shot at going big time, they can pose a real threat to an organization who has spent their money building glass castles, filling them with retired Generals, and giving out fat retirements and bennies.
KalashniKEV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 14:27   #40
RWBlue
CLM Number 120
Mr. CISSP, CISA
 
RWBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 28,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
All contracting authorities have different SB goals. How rigidly enforced they are depends on the Dep/Agency/Org. For a lot of them, if you don't meet your SB goals, you get less money next year.
Exactly!

Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
OK... we get it, minorities...
No, or not always. In fact one of the minority groups does a GREAT job at what they do, but another minority group is working the system.

I want minority gorup1 because they do a great job. I would really like to see group2 go away.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
These are just the rules of the game. Hate it or love it. Also, if you're in the game you know that competition is still just as cutthroat in these smaller pools.

Sometimes yes, sometimes no, sometimes I think we would be better off going to the strip club to support single mothers because we are not getting what we need.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KalashniKEV View Post
The government has an "agenda"
I don't like using the term "the government" for items like this. Someone has an agenda, but...

There was an article in forbes recently about the presidents and their wealth. It was very interesting. We could also look at different Senators and Representatives who have consulting companies they own or work for.....It is not all Rep or Dem, it is both of them.




On a side note, I finally finished 2 more SOWs. We will see what I get. I think I wrote them tight enough to get quality, but then again.... Anyone want to make a bet? I am betting at least 50% of these SOW $ go to a SB or a SMOB and the bids will be higher than if it was just for an open compete.
__________________
One day, I shall come back. Yes, I shall come back. Until then, there must be no regrets, no tears, no anxieties. Just go forward in all your beliefs and prove to me that I am not mistaken in mine.
RWBlue is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:40.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 740
192 Members
548 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31