GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2013, 15:27   #1
24601
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 95
bullet set back

so recently i was bored and wanted try some loads from the smaller companies (underwood, buffalo bore, double tap)....i had ordered a box of 9mm 124gr +P (24E) and a box of .357sig 125gr (25A) from buffalo bore to start out...

i went to the range and due to time constraints and my forgetting to try the new ammo (in both the g19 and the G32C) until it was time to leave, i only managed to pop off a few shots of each caliber....it went bang each time in each gun so that was good enough for me at the time.....i knew i would be heading out to the range again within the week, so i knew i would test more then....

so i thoroughly cleaned both guns (the feed ramps were clean) when i got home and i loaded up the buffalo bore rounds into each gun....popped in the mags and power stroked the slides over the top as i usually do....thought nothing of it....a week later, i decided to do some trigger work on the G19....i dropped the mag and ejected a round...(i always check for bullet set back and i never re-chamber the same rounds).....i noticed that the bullet was set back a tiny bit, but i didn't have my calipers available at the time....i snapped a pic, emailed the owner and asked him about bullet set back....he responded by saying that all bullets will naturally set back a tiny amount and after examining my pics, he said i have nothing to worry about....well, ok....

a few more days go by and i decide to do some trigger work on the G32C....i drop the mag and eject a round....the round that popped out was badly set back (it had only been chambered ONCE)....so i took measurements and took pics and emailed Tim again....now keep in mind that I had already popped off a few rounds of each so I didn't feel justified in asking for A: a refund, or B: another box of replacements....i honestly wanted to see what they would say about it and see if they offered any solutions....$30+ for 20 rounds of 357sig is a lot more expensive than buying my usual boxes of 50 rounds of winchester ranger T or federal HSTs.....

Tim responded professionally and although he wasn't rude about anything, he really didn't seem too concerned either.....i have pasted his email response below.....as i said, i don't feel right asking for a refund or replacement due to the fact that i've shot a few rounds, but having these setback issues coupled with his response of "I don't know what is going on with Glock..." and "the ammo is working great in my SIG pistol" seems like he really doesn't care about what could have happened had i fired that 357 round through my Glock.....


OK, I just tested a bunch or our 357 SIG ammo in my SIG 229. If fed wonderfully and did not experience any set back whatsoever. So, I don't know what is going on with Glock, but it is not happening with SIG, pistols who
happen to be the designers and name safe of the cartridge. I do not have a Glock here chambered in 357 SIG to test, but the ammo is working great in my SIG pistol.

Tim


Has anyone else has bad experiences with buffalo bore such as set back issues?

I will not be buying anything else from them in the future and i'm hoping that maybe others will be a bit more cautious when using their rounds.....i'm not trying to say all their ammo is crap as i'm sure i just got a bad batch.....we live in an imperfect world.....but i did want to share my experience with people on this forum....

Caliber CornerCaliber CornerCaliber Corner
24601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 15:39   #2
Revvv
Senior Member
 
Revvv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,189
That is a lot of setback.

posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
Revvv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 15:56   #3
Ljutic
Senior Member
 
Ljutic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 153
WOW......Won't be picking up any BB 357 Sig. Agree with you and Revvv, that is excessive.
__________________
Author and solo contributor to the Pocket Guns and Gear blog.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by Ljutic; 02-10-2013 at 00:15..
Ljutic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 20:13   #4
bobtheelf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nashville
Posts: 486
That should never happen with one chambering. That's dangerous.
bobtheelf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 20:24   #5
CDW4ME
Senior Member
 
CDW4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,170
I would not shoot it and that's not normal.
__________________
No internal lock or magazine disconnect on my pistols!
CDW4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 22:02   #6
clarkz71
Senior Member
 
clarkz71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,608
I rechamber 2 or 3 times the same round with my 165gr Golden Sabers and no set back at all measured with a
didgital caliper.

That's bad when you can see it with the naked eye.
__________________
Quote:
Real Men of Genius....Here's to you, Mister self proclaimed-genius-surrounded by idiots!
.
G23 gen3 .40/.357 Sig
Florida Glocker #1923
clarkz71 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 22:03   #7
clarkz71
Senior Member
 
clarkz71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,608
I rechamber 2 or 3 times the same round with my 165gr Golden Sabers and no set back at all measured with a
digital caliper.

That's bad when you can see it with the naked eye.
__________________
Quote:
Real Men of Genius....Here's to you, Mister self proclaimed-genius-surrounded by idiots!
.
G23 gen3 .40/.357 Sig
Florida Glocker #1923
clarkz71 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 01:51   #8
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,855
Blog Entries: 3
Any bullet setback greater than 0.060" is going to raise pressures. In already max pressure ammo, like 40 & 357sig, it will be dangerous levels. When it gets to the point you have there, pressures may actaully decrease a bit as there is not longer any neck tension. Either are unsafe to shoot. In some calibers, setback is going to ahppen after rechambering a round 3-4 times & has to be watched. When your roudns are 1/16" shorter than factory, time to put them in the nogo box & break them down for reloading or disposal. The 357sig is one fo the worst offenders, so watch the ammo closely. It should NOT IMO, happen after one chambering. They are not doing something right if that is happening to new factory ammo.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 02-10-2013 at 01:52..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 11:25   #9
blackbmw
Senior Member
 
blackbmw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: st. louis
Posts: 1,603
I have about 10 of Tim's .357 sig rounds that look just like yours. bullet flops back and forth in the case. I kept them to pull the gold dot for reloading purposes. Mine are a couple years old so i was hoping that the problem was solved by now. Sucks cause i love his ammo, just will not buy in that caliber anymore i guess.
blackbmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 11:34   #10
M 7
Senior Member
 
M 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
Any bullet setback greater than 0.060" is going to raise pressures. In already max pressure ammo, like 40 & 357sig, it will be dangerous levels. When it gets to the point you have there, pressures may actaully decrease a bit as there is not longer any neck tension. Either are unsafe to shoot. In some calibers, setback is going to ahppen after rechambering a round 3-4 times & has to be watched. When your roudns are 1/16" shorter than factory, time to put them in the nogo box & break them down for reloading or disposal. The 357sig is one fo the worst offenders, so watch the ammo closely. It should NOT IMO, happen after one chambering. They are not doing something right if that is happening to new factory ammo.
I wonder if they could 'fix' the issue by sizing the neck a little tighter and going with a slightly more aggressive taper crimp?
__________________
For those who CCW:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
M 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 11:43   #11
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Wow, that is a lot of bullet setback.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 14:32   #12
24601
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by M 7 View Post
I wonder if they could 'fix' the issue by sizing the neck a little tighter and going with a slightly more aggressive taper crimp?

well, judging by his email response to me and what blackbmw said, i'm thinking they just don't care....
24601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 16:14   #13
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by M 7 View Post
I wonder if they could 'fix' the issue by sizing the neck a little tighter and going with a slightly more aggressive taper crimp?
Great question . . . . .
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 18:12   #14
M 7
Senior Member
 
M 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by 24601 View Post
well, judging by his email response to me and what blackbmw said, i'm thinking they just don't care....
Yeah, I get it. You'd think that their interest in satisfying you and being motivated to find a solution to the problem would go hand-in-hand.

S'pose not....
__________________
For those who CCW:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
M 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 01:16   #15
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,855
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by M 7 View Post
I wonder if they could 'fix' the issue by sizing the neck a little tighter and going with a slightly more aggressive taper crimp?
Taper crimp does NOT hold the bullet, by desgn it can not. Think about how taper crimp works; it crimps form the base forward, so the bullet is still free top move to the rear. No, It's proper sizing & bullet fit that creates proper neck tension. The crimp only finishes off the round. Thicker brass, larger bullet, either will increase neck tension.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 02-11-2013 at 01:17..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 08:21   #16
Monotonous ONE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 229
Maybe I missed it but Im just curious...how do you dispose of it properly?

Who could you take it to?
Monotonous ONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 10:24   #17
24601
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 95
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monotonous ONE View Post
Maybe I missed it but Im just curious...how do you dispose of it properly?

Who could you take it to?

it's sitting on my desk as a reminder not to buy their products anymore ha...
24601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 17:03   #18
M 7
Senior Member
 
M 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by M 7 View Post
I wonder if they could 'fix' the issue by sizing the neck a little tighter and going with a slightly more aggressive taper crimp?
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
Taper crimp does NOT hold the bullet, by desgn it can not. Think about how taper crimp works; it crimps form the base forward, so the bullet is still free top move to the rear. No, It's proper sizing & bullet fit that creates proper neck tension. The crimp only finishes off the round. Thicker brass, larger bullet, either will increase neck tension.
I know- that why I said "by sizing the neck a little tighter and going with a slightly more aggressive taper crimp"...
__________________
For those who CCW:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
M 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 17:26   #19
barth
six barrels
 
barth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Free Zone
Posts: 5,232
I wouldn't even try to shoot that.
It seem to me
that the 357 Sig round is particularly susceptible to bullet set back.
I try to not chamber the same round twice.
And always closely inspect my 357 Sig ammo as I load mags.
I've had occasional quality control issues even with LE 357 Sig ammo.

I love 357 Sig.
But beyond cost and availability.
Bullet Set Back and Quality Control has been the dirty little secret
with the caliber for me.

Last edited by barth; 02-11-2013 at 17:28..
barth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 17:56   #20
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,855
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by M 7 View Post
I know- that why I said "by sizing the neck a little tighter and going with a slightly more aggressive taper crimp"...
The crimp comment is what is wrong. Over crimp, you can actually DECREASE neck tension as the case springs away from the bullet.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 02-11-2013 at 17:56..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 794
230 Members
564 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31