GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2013, 08:04   #1
Keoking
Senior Member
 
Keoking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 1,731


Question on LEO buying personal weapon

My BIL knows I have a safe full of pistols and wants one. He is not prohibited from owning a pistol, but he and his wife are dead broke after a couple of failed rounds of in vitro.
His wife is a Wakulla Sheriff's Deputy, so I suggested that she buy him a Glock with her LEO discount, and that I would give them the money.
Is there anything illegal about his wife buying him a gun if he is not prohibited from owning one?
If she uses a LEO discount, could this be a violation of her department policy?
__________________
"You'll shoot your eye out." -Mom
"I want a laser for my gun." -my wife
G30, G20/21L, G34, G29, G27, G33, G23
Springfield Loaded (Black SS)
Sig P220 Stainless Elite
Keoking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 08:14   #2
md2lgyk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 2,911
I can't cite chapter and verse, but it is certainly legal to buy a gun as a gift for someone else. Department policy violation? Who knows. I used to get an LEO discount from certain places, but that's because I was an LEO, not because the discount was through the department.
__________________
"The great object is, that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun." - Patrick Henry
md2lgyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 10:03   #3
jpa
CLM Number 268
Charter Lifetime Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 10,253
Send a message via AIM to jpa Send a message via Yahoo to jpa
Definitely not illegal.

Maybe.

Probably against Glock's policy for the blue label guns. I doubt they're going to send the "Glock police" after her for buying a LE labeled gun for her husband but that's not the purpose of the discount.
__________________
Big Dawg #1408, TT #1408
Moto Club #1408, GSSF Member, NRA RSO
NRA Benefactor Member
jpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 11:19   #4
SCSU74
St. Cloud Proud
 
SCSU74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Northwoods
Posts: 2,028
Why don't you just give him one and avoid the ordeal?


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
In Valor There is Hope
SCSU74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 11:21   #5
Steve in PA
Senior Member
 
Steve in PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,331
Depends.

Instead of TX, let's pretend we are talking about PA.

I'm a LEO in PA and can use my clothing and equipment allowance to purchase a firearm, provided it is something I can use "on the job". In other words, I couldn't buy a hunting shotgun or a deer rifle, or something like a Ruger Super Redhawk.

I could buy a handgun that could be used for duty or off-duty use such as any of the Sig, Glock, S&W handguns, etc. The handgun is mine, even though I used by clothing & equipment allowance to buy it, just like a pair of boots, etc.

In PA, there is no transfer required between spouses, provided the other person is not prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm. So in theory, I could go out and get a Glock 26 since it could be used by me for off-duty or plain clothes duty. But my wife would be able to carry the Glock because she is my wife.

Would my department object? I've done nothing wrong. The handgun is "mine" not the departments and therefore I've broken no law by allowing my wife to carry it.

Of course, I could also pay the money out of my pocket, still getting the LEO discount and the above situation still applies. The Glock is "mine", but my wife would be 100% legal in carrying or using it.
__________________
"The Marines I have seen around the world have, the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps. Eleanor Roosevelt, 1945"

Last edited by Steve in PA; 02-02-2013 at 15:01..
Steve in PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 12:29   #6
DaBigBR
No Infidels!
 
DaBigBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Circling the wagons.
Posts: 15,924
The big thing to watch out for would be that said gun was purchased in store and transferred on 4473 or shipped to an FFL for transfer on 4473. The alternative would be having it sent to the agency on letterhead, and doing it that way would be an issue with the "for duty use" requirement when the gun is delivered that way.
__________________
"Logic is rarely the engine that propels a police department forward."

-David Simon in "Homicide"
DaBigBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 15:19   #7
Ranger1759
Senior Member
 
Ranger1759's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 168
Blog Entries: 1
I don't see the problem....she bought the gun, she owns the gun, her husband uses the gun....no need for any kind of transfer as she still owns the gun....it doesn't have to be a "gift" it's marital property....I think it would be the same as her using on of his deer rifles during deer season....it's still his, she is just borrowing it....
__________________
Ranger1759
NRA-Line of Duty member
NMLRA
G22- Gen 2.5/ G23- Gen 3/ G27 & G19- Gen 4
Ranger1759 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 17:44   #8
BULLRUNN
Double Tap
 
BULLRUNN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hampton Roads
Posts: 728
Its Called a STRAW PURCHASE.. the ATF might have a thing or 2 to say to her about that....could cause her some problems with her command...
BULLRUNN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 19:28   #9
razdog76
Heavy Mettle
 
razdog76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,141
Husband and wife's property is all mutually owned. If they were to (God forbid) get a divorce and go their separate ways, anything one party says belongs to them could be contested by the other party.

Glock's pricing is their own doing. They also extend the discounted guns to firefighters etc... They have to be able to account for discounting some of their merchandise, hence various color labels for easy sorting in the warehouse.

A straw purchase would be one where the purchaser is going to sell the firearm to someone they know cannot legally acquire one.

If it is a personally own firearm, purchased from an FFL holder, the purchaser WILL have to fill out the ATF form, and have a background check.

Have you priced ammo lately? Anymore, the gun seems like the cheapest part.
__________________
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati

Quote:
Originally Posted by blueiron
'..You can lead an ass to facts, but you can't make them think...'
razdog76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 20:13   #10
DaBigBR
No Infidels!
 
DaBigBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Circling the wagons.
Posts: 15,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by BULLRUNN View Post
Its Called a STRAW PURCHASE.. the ATF might have a thing or 2 to say to her about that....could cause her some problems with her command...
Incorrect.

There is nothing wrong with purchasing a firearm to gift it to somebody else who can legally receive the firearm.

Illegal Straw Purchase Media Campaign Website:

http://www.dontlie.org/

ATF Training Video on the Topic:

http://www.atf.gov/training/firearms...swf/toon4.html

(Transcript: http://www.atf.gov/training/firearms...episode-4.html)
__________________
"Logic is rarely the engine that propels a police department forward."

-David Simon in "Homicide"
DaBigBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 21:39   #11
Steve in PA
Senior Member
 
Steve in PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by BULLRUNN View Post
Its Called a STRAW PURCHASE.. the ATF might have a thing or 2 to say to her about that....could cause her some problems with her command...
Wrong x2.
__________________
"The Marines I have seen around the world have, the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps. Eleanor Roosevelt, 1945"
Steve in PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 11:04   #12
spcwes
Senior Member
 
spcwes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,083
If she purchases it under letterhead which is what I think he is referring to it is for duty use only by the officer. An individual officer purchase is always done under letterhead which requires a superior officer to sign off on stating the the officer will use it for duty and if it is shipped directly to the department that the ranking officer has conducted a background check on the officer. You can not specifically use this method to buy a family member a weapon.

That being said, you can however buy the weapon, carry it on duty one day in a duty, off duty, back up or what ever other method you need to meet the stipulations of the individual officer purchase and then you are clear to do what ever legal things you want to do with the weapon.

The individual officer program only applies to states that allow the weapons/magazine capacity and if you can own it you can do this.
__________________
"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American perception that each individual is accountable for his/her actions." -Ronald Reagan-

Last edited by spcwes; 02-03-2013 at 11:05..
spcwes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 12:36   #13
AZson
Senior Member
 
AZson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tucson
Posts: 3,152
This brings up a similar well published situation that happened here in AZ, somebody from out of state paid another person from out of state to travel here and buy a gun, but yet neither was arrested. So in this instant I would say it is legal. But then the person that financed it seems to be above the law
__________________
G17 G27 G29 G35 G38 NRA GSSF
NEED A GOOD GUN? See your local ATF (AKA F-troop) agent. He will get you one fast and furiously.
AZson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 12:45   #14
walkin' trails
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,595
It may tecnically legal, but it is not something I would do as an LEO. I would be concerned about any civil issues that may arise if something bad happened to the pistol, and my name was going to be all over it. There are legitimate reasons for officers to sell personally owned firearms, but I'd opt to do it through an FFL. I have had people I knew ask me to buy them a blue label gun, and I have declined because do not need any legal liability problems, real or imagined.
__________________
Walkin' Trails
NRA Life
SAR
Firearms Instructor

Last edited by walkin' trails; 02-03-2013 at 12:46..
walkin' trails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 13:31   #15
Ranger1759
Senior Member
 
Ranger1759's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 168
Blog Entries: 1
I still don't see a problem....I recently bought a G27 at my LGS....all I needed was my dept ID and was able to buy a blue label with no problems....now I do carry that on/off duty, but it's mine, not the dept....if I wanted my wife to carry it, there would be no problem, because its mine...and like I said earlier, it's also marital property....
__________________
Ranger1759
NRA-Line of Duty member
NMLRA
G22- Gen 2.5/ G23- Gen 3/ G27 & G19- Gen 4
Ranger1759 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 13:34   #16
Keoking
Senior Member
 
Keoking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 1,731


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger1759 View Post
I still don't see a problem....I recently bought a G27 at my LGS....all I needed was my dept ID and was able to buy a blue label with no problems....now I do carry that on/off duty, but it's mine, not the dept....if I wanted my wife to carry it, there would be no problem, because its mine...and like I said earlier, it's also marital property....
This is pretty much what I was thinking about. She would buy it more or less as a private citizen who is able to use the LEO discount. No department involvement (unless there is a policy prohibiting this).
__________________
"You'll shoot your eye out." -Mom
"I want a laser for my gun." -my wife
G30, G20/21L, G34, G29, G27, G33, G23
Springfield Loaded (Black SS)
Sig P220 Stainless Elite
Keoking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 14:06   #17
spcwes
Senior Member
 
spcwes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger1759 View Post
I still don't see a problem....I recently bought a G27 at my LGS....all I needed was my dept ID and was able to buy a blue label with no problems....now I do carry that on/off duty, but it's mine, not the dept....if I wanted my wife to carry it, there would be no problem, because its mine...and like I said earlier, it's also marital property....
That is different from buying a weapon under individual officer purchase paperwork through an agency. You still own the weapon going this route but you are sold the weapon without taxes and at a reduced rate with the signed intent you are going to keep it and use it for duty. Buying it from a LSG with police id is the same as you buying it without.
__________________
"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American perception that each individual is accountable for his/her actions." -Ronald Reagan-
spcwes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 14:43   #18
msu_grad_121
BOOSH
 
msu_grad_121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NW Burbs
Posts: 2,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by spcwes View Post
That is different from buying a weapon under individual officer purchase paperwork through an agency. You still own the weapon going this route but you are sold the weapon without taxes and at a reduced rate with the signed intent you are going to keep it and use it for duty. Buying it from a LSG with police id is the same as you buying it without.
I've got to be honest with you, I think you're wrong here. I've bought a few blue label guns in my time. Never did I go through the department, as they were individual officer purchases. Obviously the price for these is higher than it would be for a department purchase, but the only thing I needed to present was my department ID. They took a copy of the ID, and bingo, my own personally owned blue label Glock.

I would say as long as there is no specific policy against this sort of thing, and as long as he's allowed to legally own a pistol, I doubt there's anything wrong with it, or that she would get in any sort of trouble. That's just my interpretation of it, though.
__________________
The name on the left side of your chest represents who you work for. The name on the right side of your chest represents who raised you. Make them both proud.
msu_grad_121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 15:19   #19
DISCO SON
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: OHIO
Posts: 28
You don't need a Dept. letterhead to buy a weapon from Glock or S&W under LEO discount. You need to find a dealer who is either a LEO dealer for Glock or S&W, they copy your Dept. ID and you purchase the weapon.

I've purchased many a glock and S&W under those terms, never have had to get a Dept. letterhead.

If you call glock or S&W, they will give you their closest LEO dealer to you.

Good Luck,

Disco Son
DISCO SON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 15:30   #20
spcwes
Senior Member
 
spcwes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by msu_grad_121 View Post
I've got to be honest with you, I think you're wrong here. I've bought a few blue label guns in my time. Never did I go through the department, as they were individual officer purchases. Obviously the price for these is higher than it would be for a department purchase, but the only thing I needed to present was my department ID. They took a copy of the ID, and bingo, my own personally owned blue label Glock.

I would say as long as there is no specific policy against this sort of thing, and as long as he's allowed to legally own a pistol, I doubt there's anything wrong with it, or that she would get in any sort of trouble. That's just my interpretation of it, though.
Again different than what I am talking about. Trust me I sign the paperwork for the officers. If I was at the office I would copy paste the paperwork on here so you could see how it is worded. That being said our dealer for the weapons we purchase is in a different state so we can't go to the dealer to purchase.

The way we do this is fill out paperwork that states you intend to purchase the weapon for duty use and not for someone else or with intent to sell. You then describe the weapon you intend to purchase and sign the document and send it to the ranking officer that can sign the form for the Chief/Sheriff or the Chief/Sheriff and then the paperwork is mailed to the LE dealer. The dealer processes the paperwork and then contacts the officer directly for payment.

This is the same process for our agency from 3 different suppliers and is NOT in our policy. We have policy on what can be carried and qualification but not how the weapons are purchased.

The process has also been the same for me with every agency I have worked with just different letterhead. The letterhead gives you a tax free purchase with 3 standard capacity magazines for about $395 on a Glock gen 3 or 4. Again, I never have walked into a LE distributor and purchased so can't speak on that.

Edited to add: The paperwork is universal for agency and officer purchases from most companies. GT Distributors has the paperwork in generic template on their website for instance. You copy past that onto letterhead and fill out the info they request. And I am not saying this is THE way you have to complete this process. It is how we do it and I would imagine many others as well.
__________________
"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American perception that each individual is accountable for his/her actions." -Ronald Reagan-

Last edited by spcwes; 02-03-2013 at 15:36..
spcwes is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:32.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,296
343 Members
953 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42