Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2013, 17:56   #1
SJ 40
Senior Member
 
SJ 40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 7,189
.223 remington vs. 5.56 nato: What you don’t know could hurt you

Came across this warning today and some may not know the differences. Thought what with all the first time new semi auto owners it maybe worth sharing.

Is firing a 5.56 NATO cartridge in your .223 Remington chambered AR15 dangerous? Or do Internet forum-ninjas and ammunition companies selling you commercial ammo instead of surplus overstate the dangers? Believe it or not, a real danger exists, and some gun owners who think they are doing the right thing may not be safe.

The Cartridges

The .223 Remington and 5.56×45 NATO cartridges are very similar, and externally appear the same. But there are some differences that lie beneath the surface.

The 5.56 case has thicker walls to handle higher pressures, meaning the interior volume of the case is smaller than that of a .223. This will alter the loading data used when reloading 5.56 brass to .223 specs.

Some 5.56 loads have a slightly longer overall length than commercial .223 loads.

The Chambers

The significant difference between the .223 Rem and 5.56 NATO lies in the rifles, rather than the cartridges themselves. Both the .223 and 5.56 rounds will chamber in rifles designed for either cartridge, but the critical component, leade, will be different in each rifle.

The leade is the area of the barrel in front of the chamber prior to where the rifling begins. This is where the loaded bullet is located when a cartridge is chambered. The leade is frequently called the “throat.”

On a .223 Remington spec rifle, the leade will be 0.085”. This is the standard described by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute, Inc. (SAAMI). The leade in a 5.56 NATO spec rifle is 0.162”, or almost double the leade of the .223 rifle.

A shorter leade in a SAAMI spec rifle creates a situation where the bullet in a 5.56 NATO round, when chambered, can contact the rifling prior to being fired. By having contact with the rifling prematurely (at the moment of firing), chamber pressure can be dramatically increased, creating the danger of a ruptured case or other cartridge/gun failure.

The reverse situation, a .223 Rem round in a 5.56 NATO gun, isn’t dangerous. The leade is longer, so a slight loss in velocity and accuracy may be experienced, but there is not a danger of increased pressures and subsequent catastrophic failure.

How serious is the danger of firing 5.56 ammo in .223 guns? Dangerous enough that the SAAMI lists 5.56 military ammo as being not for use in .223 firearms in the technical data sheet titled “Unsafe Firearm-Ammunition Combinations.”

ATK, the parent company of ammunition manufacturers Federal Cartridge Company and Speer, published a bulletin entitled “The Difference Between 223 Rem and 5.56 Military Cartridges.” In this bulletin, ATK stated using 5.56 ammo in a .223 rifle could result in “…primer pocket gas leaks, blown cartridge case heads, and gun functioning issues.”

However, the danger may be lower than SAAMI or ATK suggest. In Technical Note #74 from ArmaLite, the company states “millions of rounds of NATO ammunition have been fired safely in Eagle Arms and ArmaLite’s® SAAMI chambers over the past 22 years,” and they have not had any catastrophic failures.

According to ArmaLite:

“Occasionally a non-standard round (of generally imported) ammunition will fit too tightly in the leade, and resistance to early bullet movement can cause elevated chamber pressures. These pressures are revealed by overly flattened primers or by powder stains around the primer that reveal leaking gasses.”

What Do You Have?

So, if you own a rifle chambered for the .223 for 5.56, do you know for which caliber it is really chambered?

Many match rifles are chambered in .223 Remington (SAAMI specs) for tighter tolerances, and theoretically better accuracy.

Many of the AR-15’s currently sold on the market are made for the 5.56 NATO cartridge. If you own one of these, you should be fine with any .223 or 5.56 ammunition.

However, ATK dropped this bomb in the bulletin on the .223/5.56:

“It is our understanding that commercially available AR15’s and M16’s – although some are stamped 5.56 Rem on the receiver – are manufactured with .223 chambers.”

So, even if your AR is stamped 5.56, is it really? Check your owner’s manual or call the company directly and make sure you get an answer you feel comfortable with.

As if the confusion regarding the .223 vs 5.56 chambers wasn’t enough, there is a third possibility in the mix, that is being used by at least one major manufacturer. The .223 Wylde chamber is a modified SAAMI-spec .223 chamber that allows for the safe use of 5.56 NATO rounds, but maintains tighter tolerances for better accuracy.

Yeah, yeah… What’s the bottom line?

Here’s the bottom line. If you want to follow the safest possible course, always shoot .223 Remington ammunition. The .223 Rem cartridge will safely shoot in any rifle chambered for the .223 or 5.56.

If you want to shoot 5.56 NATO rounds, make sure you have a rifle designed for the 5.56 military cartridge. Shooting 5.56 in a normal .223 Rem rifle can result in bad things.
SJ 40
SJ 40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 18:07   #2
GIG4FUN
Senior Member
 
GIG4FUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 167
Colt M4 an Sig M400 (good on both counts here) and for some reason I have seen this a million times. I sure hope it is known by everyone.


BUT you know.... they're out there
__________________
Christian strong willed old man...
G17G4 G22G4 G23G4 +--> G32 barrel
Colt M4 w/EOTech HHS1- SA M1 (Garand & Carbine)
SArmory XDm.45compact - H&K .45c / NRA member
S&W & Browning & Ruger & Winchester & Remington
GIG4FUN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 18:09   #3
dkf
Senior Member
 
dkf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,533
I posted this article already however I think this would be a good place to post it again.

http://www.gundigest.com/223-vs-5-56
dkf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 18:25   #4
barth
six barrels
 
barth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Free Zone
Posts: 5,184
My simple analogy for 5.56 vs .223?
Is +P vs standard pressure ammo.
Not all guns are +P rated.
You might get away with shooting a small quantity +P ammo
through a gun not +P rated.
But maybe not and that's on you.

My Bulgarian Arsenal AK74 is a mil-spec 5.56 NATO gun.

Last edited by barth; 01-21-2013 at 18:31..
barth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 18:33   #5
AtlantaR6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
S&W M&P Sport.... Does anyone know?
AtlantaR6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 18:47   #6
banger
Senior Member
 
banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Where evil lives
Posts: 1,379
By way of a rhetorical question....

When was the last time anyone here actually heard of ANYONE having ANY problems firing 5,56 in a .223?

Personally I have been shooting for more years than many people on this forum have been alive.

This includes the years when a .223/5.56 was considered rare and unique.

Back when surplus ammo was WIDELY available and for very modest prices.

I have fired more thousands than I probably care to recall and witness even more.

Yet, I have NEVER seen or heard of ANY problem using the ammo interchangeably.

But, Hey that's just me.

EDIT: Simply to put perspective on this issue...The two cartridges have peacefully coexisted for over 50 years!

And yet still no DOCUMENTED damage to firearms or persons as a result.

Last edited by banger; 01-21-2013 at 18:54..
banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 19:15   #7
packinaglock
John 3:16 <><
 
packinaglock's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Loxahatchee Fl
Posts: 4,763
My AR states it can use either.
__________________
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
packinaglock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 19:31   #8
Merkavaboy
Code-7A KUZ769
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In The State Of Fruitloops (CA)
Posts: 5,388
More info on .223 Rem v. 5.56x45mm.

http://www.thegunzone.com/556v223.html
__________________
"I spent the last two years of high school in a daze....attended classes sparingly, drank beer heavily, and tried drugs enthusiastically."
Barack Obama
One Bad Ass Mistake America
Merkavaboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 19:52   #9
ancient_serpent
Senior Member
 
ancient_serpent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,790
Yeah, never heard of any problems or seen any either. My AR's are all in 5.56, so it's not a worry.
__________________
"The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions."
-Daniel Webster
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have."
ancient_serpent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 07:11   #10
Brucev
Senior Member
 
Brucev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,189
Re: OP. Proof that Chicken Little lives. Similar warnings about .308 Winchester/7.62mm NATO rounds are also circulated. And in extreme cases, CL and company have a point... in those odd extreme cases. Like anything else, there will be instances when someone w/ a minimum chamber and a maximum dimension round will have some excitement. But the norm is not the single odd instance. The norm is the experience of the broad majority of users. And the broad majority of users firing .223/5.56mm is that in normal common rifles w/ normal commercially cut chambers, throats, bores, etc., CL is an oddity.
Brucev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 19:24   #11
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJ 40 View Post
Came across this warning today and some may not know the differences. Thought what with all the first time new semi auto owners it maybe worth sharing.

Is firing a 5.56 NATO cartridge in your .223 Remington chambered AR15 dangerous? Or do Internet forum-ninjas and ammunition companies selling you commercial ammo instead of surplus overstate the dangers? Believe it or not, a real danger exists, and some gun owners who think they are doing the right thing may not be safe.

The Cartridges

The .223 Remington and 5.56×45 NATO cartridges are very similar, and externally appear the same. But there are some differences that lie beneath the surface.

The 5.56 case has thicker walls to handle higher pressures, meaning the interior volume of the case is smaller than that of a .223. This will alter the loading data used when reloading 5.56 brass to .223 specs.

Some 5.56 loads have a slightly longer overall length than commercial .223 loads.

The Chambers

The significant difference between the .223 Rem and 5.56 NATO lies in the rifles, rather than the cartridges themselves. Both the .223 and 5.56 rounds will chamber in rifles designed for either cartridge, but the critical component, leade, will be different in each rifle.

The leade is the area of the barrel in front of the chamber prior to where the rifling begins. This is where the loaded bullet is located when a cartridge is chambered. The leade is frequently called the “throat.”

On a .223 Remington spec rifle, the leade will be 0.085”. This is the standard described by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute, Inc. (SAAMI). The leade in a 5.56 NATO spec rifle is 0.162”, or almost double the leade of the .223 rifle.

A shorter leade in a SAAMI spec rifle creates a situation where the bullet in a 5.56 NATO round, when chambered, can contact the rifling prior to being fired. By having contact with the rifling prematurely (at the moment of firing), chamber pressure can be dramatically increased, creating the danger of a ruptured case or other cartridge/gun failure.

The reverse situation, a .223 Rem round in a 5.56 NATO gun, isn’t dangerous. The leade is longer, so a slight loss in velocity and accuracy may be experienced, but there is not a danger of increased pressures and subsequent catastrophic failure.

How serious is the danger of firing 5.56 ammo in .223 guns? Dangerous enough that the SAAMI lists 5.56 military ammo as being not for use in .223 firearms in the technical data sheet titled “Unsafe Firearm-Ammunition Combinations.”

ATK, the parent company of ammunition manufacturers Federal Cartridge Company and Speer, published a bulletin entitled “The Difference Between 223 Rem and 5.56 Military Cartridges.” In this bulletin, ATK stated using 5.56 ammo in a .223 rifle could result in “…primer pocket gas leaks, blown cartridge case heads, and gun functioning issues.”

However, the danger may be lower than SAAMI or ATK suggest. In Technical Note #74 from ArmaLite, the company states “millions of rounds of NATO ammunition have been fired safely in Eagle Arms and ArmaLite’s® SAAMI chambers over the past 22 years,” and they have not had any catastrophic failures.

According to ArmaLite:

“Occasionally a non-standard round (of generally imported) ammunition will fit too tightly in the leade, and resistance to early bullet movement can cause elevated chamber pressures. These pressures are revealed by overly flattened primers or by powder stains around the primer that reveal leaking gasses.”

What Do You Have?

So, if you own a rifle chambered for the .223 for 5.56, do you know for which caliber it is really chambered?

Many match rifles are chambered in .223 Remington (SAAMI specs) for tighter tolerances, and theoretically better accuracy.

Many of the AR-15’s currently sold on the market are made for the 5.56 NATO cartridge. If you own one of these, you should be fine with any .223 or 5.56 ammunition.

However, ATK dropped this bomb in the bulletin on the .223/5.56:

“It is our understanding that commercially available AR15’s and M16’s – although some are stamped 5.56 Rem on the receiver – are manufactured with .223 chambers.”

So, even if your AR is stamped 5.56, is it really? Check your owner’s manual or call the company directly and make sure you get an answer you feel comfortable with.

As if the confusion regarding the .223 vs 5.56 chambers wasn’t enough, there is a third possibility in the mix, that is being used by at least one major manufacturer. The .223 Wylde chamber is a modified SAAMI-spec .223 chamber that allows for the safe use of 5.56 NATO rounds, but maintains tighter tolerances for better accuracy.

Yeah, yeah… What’s the bottom line?

Here’s the bottom line. If you want to follow the safest possible course, always shoot .223 Remington ammunition. The .223 Rem cartridge will safely shoot in any rifle chambered for the .223 or 5.56.

If you want to shoot 5.56 NATO rounds, make sure you have a rifle designed for the 5.56 military cartridge. Shooting 5.56 in a normal .223 Rem rifle can result in bad things.
SJ 40
Thanks for the informative post.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 22:25   #12
Waboom!!
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Minnesota, yah sure you betcha
Posts: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaR6 View Post
S&W M&P Sport.... Does anyone know?
If you own said gun... then look at barrel stamp and owners manual... DUH
Waboom!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 23:41   #13
RJ's Guns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by banger View Post
By way of a rhetorical question....

When was the last time anyone here actually heard of ANYONE having ANY problems firing 5,56 in a .223?

Personally I have been shooting for more years than many people on this forum have been alive.

This includes the years when a .223/5.56 was considered rare and unique.

Back when surplus ammo was WIDELY available and for very modest prices.

I have fired more thousands than I probably care to recall and witness even more.

Yet, I have NEVER seen or heard of ANY problem using the ammo interchangeably.

But, Hey that's just me.

EDIT: Simply to put perspective on this issue...The two cartridges have peacefully coexisted for over 50 years!

And yet still no DOCUMENTED damage to firearms or persons as a result.
I am also an old-timer and I have never had, heard or seen any problems using the ammo interchangeably

RJ
RJ's Guns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2013, 21:14   #14
eyelikeglasses
Hooah, Hooah.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Sunshine State
Posts: 1,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaR6 View Post
S&W M&P Sport.... Does anyone know?
5.56, look on the barrel.
eyelikeglasses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 14:18   #15
tango44
Senior Member
 
tango44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Miami Florida
Posts: 5,340
Colt Gov Carbine here, 223 is all I use!
Thanks a lot fot taking the time to write about it!
tango44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 14:23   #16
Foxtrotx1
Senior Member
 
Foxtrotx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,029
http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/5-56-vs-223/

Won't hurt your gun unless you are at the extremes of tolerances for both ammo and barrel.
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.

Eagle Scout.
Foxtrotx1 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 18:48.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,467
420 Members
1,047 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31