GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-09-2013, 12:12   #1
lucky-gunner
Senior Member
 
lucky-gunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 327
Brass vs. Steel Torture Test: Which Is More Reliable & More Cost-Effective?

The question of brass vs. steel ammunition has spawned a seemingly never-ending debate from new and seasoned shooters alike. Our team at Lucky Gunner Labs took 4 brand-new AR-15 carbines and a total of 40,000 rounds of 55 grain FMJ ammunition from Federal, Wolf, Tula, and Brown Bear out to the Arizona desert for an epic brass vs. steel ammo torture test to try and scientifically settle this debate once and for all.

Scroll down for a written summary of our test, click here for our 2-minute video summary, or go read the full test results at Lucky Gunner Labs by clicking here.

Our Test Tools:
Our Test Methodology (Full Summary):
  • We paired each ammunition type with a specific Bushmaster AR-15 and then fired all 10,000 rounds of it through that particular carbine.
  • We systematically observed and tested various things, including:
    • At the start: accuracy, velocity, chamber and gas port pressures, chamber cast
    • After 2,000 rounds: accuracy, velocity
    • After 4,000 rounds: accuracy, velocity
    • After 5,000 rounds: throat erosion, chamber cast
    • After 6,000 rounds: accuracy, velocity
    • After 8,000 rounds: accuracy, velocity
    • After 10,000 rounds: accuracy, velocity, chamber and gas port pressures, throat erosion, extractor wear, chamber cast, barrel wear
  • We logged every malfunction of every rifle-ammo combination.
  • We cleaned each rifle according to a preset schedule and temperatures were monitored and kept within acceptable limits.
  • We sectioned the barrels and otherwise made unique observations after the test was complete.

Our Test Results For Reliability (Full Summary):
  • Federal: 10,000 rounds, 0 malfunctions.
  • Brown Bear: 10,000 rounds, 9 malfunctions (5 stuck cases, 1 magazine-related failure to feed, 3 failures to fully cycle).
  • Wolf: 10,000 rounds, 15 malfunctions (stuck cases).
  • Tula: DNF (6,000 rounds in alternate carbine, 3 malfunctions).

Our Test Results For Cost (Full Summary):
  • Federal's brass rounds performed the best but certain brands of steel-cased ammo are most cost-effective, even after factoring in the cost of replacement barrels. Click here to read more.

Full Report Summary (including an overview video, pictures, methodology, and full findings): Click Here To View

And most importantly, next time you're engaged in this age-old "brass vs. steel" debate, use the 40,000 rounds of ammo we put down-range in our test to back up your position!

http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/bras...el-cased-ammo/
lucky-gunner is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:48.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,360
411 Members
949 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42