Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
|
12-26-2012, 23:52
|
#1
|
|
Long Range Guru
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bunker in the Midwest
Posts: 4,077
|
There will be no AWB!
1) We control the House
2) SCOTUS ruled the 2nd amendment is a RIGHT
3) The Liberals are panicking as they lose their gun control narrative!
4) Executive Order will accomplish nothing as obama has no authority to issue new law! He's out of place here and will easily lose any court battle!
5) The gun control tide is losing steam and were winning the majority of all gun control polls, And the NRA is gaining as many as 8K new members a day!
__________________
In the works, 338 Lapua built on a Surgeon 1581/R XL Action/Krieger Stick/Jewel Trigger with a Nightforce NXS 8-32X56 Glass
Some Guardian Angels wear white, The others wear Blackhawk!
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 00:18
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 215
|
I hope you are right......
Summary of 2013 Feinstein Assault Weapons
Legislation
Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
120 specifically-named firearms
Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a
detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept
more than 10 rounds
Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts andflash suppressors from
the characteristics test
Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bulletbuttons” to address
attempts to “work around” prior bans
Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than
10 rounds.
Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existinggun owners by:
Grandfathering weaponslegally possessed on the date of enactment
Exempting over900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or
sporting purposes and
Exempting antique,manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered underthe National Firearms
Act, toinclude:
o Background check of owner and any transferee;
o Type and serial number of the firearm;
o Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
o Certification from local law enforcement ofidentity and that
possession would not violate State or local law; and
o Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
12-27-2012, 00:30
|
#3
|
|
Hated .GOV Goon
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South Korea
Posts: 3,224
|
If you guys aren't familiar with NFA weapons now, better get familiar if this bill passes.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 05:03
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Three Guesses
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Airborne Infantryman
If you guys aren't familiar with NFA weapons now, better get familiar if this bill passes. 
|
Won't matter if this passes in its current form because it bans transfer outright. In other words, you must go through the NFA process to keep what you've got, but you won't be able to buy someone else's registered weapon.
That said, this looks so onerous as to make it more difficult to get moderate votes. The worse the bill, the less likely it will get passed.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 05:19
|
#5
|
|
CLM Number 185
Federal Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Beaumont,Texas
Posts: 25,099
|
No AWB.
Got to think positive.
__________________
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs."
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 05:21
|
#6
|
|
OIF 04-05
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nowhereville, USA
Posts: 3,966
|
I think the OP has overdosed on the NRA Kool-Aid! Sorry folks don't think we are going to escape this one. When children are killed like they were...The anti-gun liberals surface.
Last edited by TangoFoxtrot; 12-27-2012 at 05:23..
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 05:59
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 935
|
I agree with the OP.
__________________
Chuck Norris wears Hickok45 pajamas
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 06:07
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Posts: 914
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wriggly
[B]
Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered underthe National Firearms
Act, toinclude:
o Background check of owner and any transferee;
o Type and serial number of the firearm;
o Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
o Certification from local law enforcement ofidentity and that
possession would not violate State or local law; and
o Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration
|
^ Only reason for this is so they can take them away on a later date.
__________________
Saying someone open carries for the attention is like saying someone concealed carries for the opportunity to shoot a criminal. Neither statement is true.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 07:48
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 111
|
Because the Republicans control the House, they can prevent any new legislation by simply doing nothing. Any new law has to be approved by both House and Senate. The far right wing of the party controls the House. Right now they are blocking the fiscal cliff legislation because they won't support a tax increase for people making over $1 million per year so I doubt they are going to cave to Democratic pressure on the issue of guns. If the pressure to "do something" continues into the Spring they can drag things out for another 6 months by holding committee hearings and then write a bill that deals solely with preventing the mentally ill from buying guns and forcing the Justice Dept. to actually prosecute people who lie on the 4473 form. It will be impossible to reconcile this bill with a Senate AWB bill so the whole thing will die.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 08:34
|
#10
|
|
you savvy?
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: in a socialist nation
Posts: 17,651
|
didnt we control the house when obama care was pushed through?
didnt the scotus change obama care so that it fell as a tax instead?
didnt obama use executive orders to change a lot of things while he holds the office?
do you still believe that the house of reps will stay conservative?
do you still believe the scotus will stand by the constitution and not revise it?
do you still believe obama wont threaten others with executive orders and other things?
dont be naive about the levels the democrats will sink to in order to get their way and change America from made it great.
__________________
wheres my free phone?
both Obama and the KKK want to disarm black folks.
www.silentscream.org
Last edited by cowboywannabe; 12-27-2012 at 09:01..
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 08:52
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,235
|
Yep King Obamamoa has subverted the rule of law many times why would this be any different. Did he not give amnesty to illegals already? Illegally ran guns into Mexico? Got away with murdering thousands down there! And you stupid people voted him back into office!! And you expect anything different in the next 4 years! You all are truely stupid!
__________________
Gunnut45/454-One shot one kill!
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 08:57
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,421
|
Never
Famous last word.......Fact is 20 little kids were slaughtered, massacred, killed, however they want to portray it...Someone has to pay. It may not be now, but in 2 years when the reps loose the house(& they will because they are not catering to the minorities that voted for O) we will see something.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 09:00
|
#13
|
|
CLM Number 185
Federal Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Beaumont,Texas
Posts: 25,099
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Bishop
Because the Republicans control the House, they can prevent any new legislation by simply doing nothing. Any new law has to be approved by both House and Senate. The far right wing of the party controls the House. Right now they are blocking the fiscal cliff legislation because they won't support a tax increase for people making over $1 million per year so I doubt they are going to cave to Democratic pressure on the issue of guns. If the pressure to "do something" continues into the Spring they can drag things out for another 6 months by holding committee hearings and then write a bill that deals solely with preventing the mentally ill from buying guns and forcing the Justice Dept. to actually prosecute people who lie on the 4473 form. It will be impossible to reconcile this bill with a Senate AWB bill so the whole thing will die.
|
Excellent post.
__________________
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs."
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 09:08
|
#14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NYS
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy03cls
Never
Famous last word.......Fact is 20 little kids were slaughtered, massacred, killed, however they want to portray it...Someone has to pay. It may not be now, but in 2 years when the reps loose the house(& they will because they are not catering to the minorities that voted for O) we will see something.
|
While it was horrific, let's not forget it is rare. Here are the causes of death per 100,000 children between the ages of 5-14.
4.1 - Unintentional Injury
2.2 - Cancer
0.9 - Congenital Anomalies
0.8 - Homicide
0.7 - Suicide
0.5 - Heart Disease
This data was from 2009. In the 2009-2010 school year there were 11 deaths, 7 were shootings, 1 fight related, and 3 stabbings. I'm doing some guess work based on some census data that there are about 48 million kids between the age of 5-14 in the US. So 0.00001458% of school children in that age range were killed on school grounds by a gun.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 09:12
|
#15
|
|
Silver Membership
Tactically Epic
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,545
|
Feinsteins ban is so bad nobody will vote for it, it will be back to the drawing board and theyll run out of steam. Republians wont vote for it, poilitical suicide for a republican. Remember the 94 ban? Both houses got taken by republicans. Democrats wont touch the bill if they care about reelection, it wont help them and they know we'll clear out congress.
__________________
Tactical Pizza Delivery Specialist.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 09:14
|
#16
|
|
Beard One
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 7,495
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TangoFoxtrot
I think the OP has overdosed on the NRA Kool-Aid! Sorry folks don't think we are going to escape this one. When children are killed like they were...The anti-gun liberals surface.
|
This:
I truly believe people in the firearms owning community are severely under-estimating what is happening right now.
We'll see.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 09:50
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,577
|
Gentlemen, this was posted in another thread, but http://1389blog.com/2012/12/23/larry...e-and-for-all/
Give that a read over, I think you'll feel better. I was, and it makes me realize that there are a lot of us in America that feel the same way.
__________________
"The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions."
-Daniel Webster
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have."
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 10:08
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&P15T
This:
I truly believe people in the firearms owning community are severely under-estimating what is happening right now.
We'll see.
|
Some of us pay more attention than others.
A lot of us remember the first AWB, and the political slaughter that followed the next mid-term election. A lot of Democrats remember this as well.
Feinstein had this bill in her desk, and has probably proposed it every few months since the last AWB expired.
A US Senator got shot in the face and it was just like this, where all you heard about for the next few weeks was "ban this" and "regulate that". Bills were proposed but were laughed at in Committee, they never made it to the floor for a vote. It was forgotten shortly after.
VP Biden was put in charge of the effort, if that tells you anything about how serious Obama is about passing a ban  Now, when nothing succeeds, he can tell the loonies on the Left "Well, I put the vice president in charge of this, if he couldn't get it done no one could have  "
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 10:19
|
#19
|
|
CLM Number 185
Federal Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Beaumont,Texas
Posts: 25,099
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RatDrall
Some of us pay more attention than others.
A lot of us remember the first AWB, and the political slaughter that followed the next mid-term election. A lot of Democrats remember this as well.
Feinstein had this bill in her desk, and has probably proposed it every few months since the last AWB expired.
A US Senator got shot in the face and it was just like this, where all you heard about for the next few weeks was "ban this" and "regulate that". Bills were proposed but were laughed at in Committee, they never made it to the floor for a vote. It was forgotten shortly after.
VP Biden was put in charge of the effort, if that tells you anything about how serious Obama is about passing a ban  Now, when nothing succeeds, he can tell the loonies on the Left "Well, I put the vice president in charge of this, if he couldn't get it done no one could have  "
|
Excellent Post.
__________________
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs."
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 10:24
|
#20
|
|
CLM Number
www.AR15pro.net
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Behind an AR-15
Posts: 29,619
|
However unlikely you think it is, we must treat it as if it is a great threat. Our response to this proposal should be very clear and very loud.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 10:26
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,818
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboywannabe
didnt we control the house when obama care was pushed through?
didnt the scotus change obama care so that it fell as a tax instead?
didnt obama use executive orders to change a lot of things while he holds the office?
do you still believe that the house of reps will stay conservative?
do you still believe the scotus will stand by the constitution and not revise it?
do you still believe obama wont threaten others with executive orders and other things?
dont be naive about the levels the democrats will sink to in order to get their way and change America from made it great.
|
Wow, for starters don't you remember Speaker Pelosi telling everyone they needed to vote for 0bamacare to see what's inside it? No, the Dems controlled the House and Senate and it was passed without a single Republican vote.
The SCOTUS said the penalty was a tax, and Congress had the authority to levy taxes. The Penalty was the question before them. They also said the States couldn't be blackmailed into expanding their Medicaid. I guess that part of their decision went right over your head too?
0bma hasn't changed much with executive orders. They aren't an unlimited power.
The House is standing pretty firm on the Fiscal Cliff. The Pubbies know they'll never get reelected if they throw guns under the bus.
SCOTUS doesn't have the power to revise the Constitution. Only Congress does, with a supermajority and it also requires a supermajority ratification by a majority of states. You really don't know how our government works judging by your questions.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 10:54
|
#22
|
|
Silver Membership
Tactically Epic
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,545
|
The ban would turn all handguns into nfa weapons thus making them illegal to carry.
__________________
Tactical Pizza Delivery Specialist.
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 13:00
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,235
|
fuzzy03cls
And the evil black rifle was found in the trunk of his car unused in the killing of the children! Funny how that little detail wasn't on the news ! Now how could that happen with Obamamoa truth telling media!
__________________
Gunnut45/454-One shot one kill!
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 13:13
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 13,476
|
I don't see how NFA registration and no transfers (especially no transfers) survives court challenges. Unless Obama picks a new Supreme. Then we're screwed.
Elections have consequences.
Last edited by cowboy1964; 12-27-2012 at 13:13..
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 13:27
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: IN
Posts: 185
|
The house speaker has already said it's time to put gun control on the table!
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 00:11.
|
|
|