Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
12-23-2012, 20:23
|
#1
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern U.S.A.
Posts: 70
|
Beretta nano serial number question
Does anyone know what serial number they started updating the nano at? There were a few issues with FTE early on. Following that I believe Beretta updated the extractor and/or ejector to solve this issue. I believe some have said it was around #2000?? Min is 14XXX-15XXX range. I just sold my 26 today so I have taken the plunge! Thanks for the help guys!
__________________
G26 Gen3, Crossbread supertuck
A wise man once said, "A poor workman blames his tools. A poor marksman blames his caliber."
|
|
|
|
12-25-2012, 22:24
|
#2
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern U.S.A.
Posts: 70
|
Bump!
__________________
G26 Gen3, Crossbread supertuck
A wise man once said, "A poor workman blames his tools. A poor marksman blames his caliber."
|
|
|
|
|
12-26-2012, 08:42
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bridgeport, CT
Posts: 3,558
|
I didn't find the answer online. You should call Beretta.
|
|
|
|
|
12-26-2012, 14:16
|
#4
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 33
|
I just bought a Nano as well, thinking that I would be safe by now with it having the newer extractor/ejector. However, I am not sure as my serial # is NU003XXX.
The best I could find was ones built in early spring of this year would be fine (around 6000 plus). Yours in the 14-15K range should be GTG.
I shot over a 100 rounds in my mine last week with a total of 4 FTE on Winchester white box 115. None on 124 or 147 self defence rounds (probably 30-40 of those) that I shot at the beginning of the session.
I will keep shooting it to see if the FTE continue with the cheap stuff and then decide if it needs to go back to Beretta or not.
I feel kind of dumb not checking the serial number before buying it to make sure it was a newer one. But there are plenty of guys with very low serial numbers that have had no FTE or issues at all.
|
|
|
|
|
12-26-2012, 16:07
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 971
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiverRat5.0
Does anyone know what serial number they started updating the nano at? There were a few issues with FTE early on. Following that I believe Beretta updated the extractor and/or ejector to solve this issue. I believe some have said it was around #2000?? Min is 14XXX-15XXX range. I just sold my 26 today so I have taken the plunge! Thanks for the help guys!
|
I can't believe you sold a 26 to get a Nano. I'm a Beretta fanboy, but the Nano was a total piece of crap. My G26 is the best shooting pistol I've ever owned, so much better than the Nano. To each his own I guess.
__________________
Chuck Norris wears Hickok45 pajamas
|
|
|
|
|
12-26-2012, 16:49
|
#6
|
|
Senior member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bowling Green,KY
Posts: 294
|
Mine is 156xx. No issues at all firing blazer 115 grain. Im not selling my g26, but the Nano is a nice weapon.
posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
Big Dawg #1166
|
|
|
|
|
12-26-2012, 17:05
|
#7
|
|
NRA Patron
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PRK
Posts: 9,245
|
I have no idea. Mine was bought last month and has not given me any heartburn at all. It ha a NU024XXX serial number.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb1911
I can't believe you sold a 26 to get a Nano. I'm a Beretta fanboy, but the Nano was a total piece of crap. My G26 is the best shooting pistol I've ever owned, so much better than the Nano. To each his own I guess.
|
It is not even close to being a piece of crap.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 21, 26 X 2, 32 and 36.
Proud member of the PigPen. Embrace the Pignose.
|
|
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 05:56
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 971
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by G26S239
It is not even close to being a piece of crap.
|
Mine was. In a self defense firearm FTFs are unacceptable. Just my opinion, of course. I sold mine because I couldn't trust it.
__________________
Chuck Norris wears Hickok45 pajamas
|
|
|
|
|
12-27-2012, 08:17
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bridgeport, CT
Posts: 3,558
|
BTW mine is in the 5000 range & has no issues.
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2012, 20:05
|
#10
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Northern U.S.A.
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb1911
Mine was. In a self defense firearm FTFs are unacceptable. Just my opinion, of course. I sold mine because I couldn't trust it.
|
I kind of regret buying my 26 all together. A clunky brick of a gun. It shot decent, but wasn't what I was looking for at the end of the day. The nano is a single stack subcompact. Which as we all know, Glock is ignoring. I just felt like the 26 was to bulky and had a hard to reach mag release. So far my nano has been gret. No Issues.. Thanks for the harsh opinion. Did you ever try sending your gun to beretta? Everyone I have seen that had issues had them resolved after sending it in.
__________________
G26 Gen3, Crossbread supertuck
A wise man once said, "A poor workman blames his tools. A poor marksman blames his caliber."
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2013, 17:02
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,123
|
Just picked one up last night.
Sent from my DROID RAZR
__________________
-- Best Regards,
-- BLau
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43.
|
|
|
