Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-20-2012, 22:24   #1
vettely
Senior Member
 
vettely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 1,411
Guess "Mil Spec" is a moot point now..

I guess buying something without the prancing ponies does not really matter right about now. No?
__________________
N.R.A. Life Member
vettely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 23:33   #2
mjkeat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,450
Yep. Let's purchase any POS just because the world is coming to an end as we know it. No not really, quality is always a factor.
mjkeat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 23:35   #3
XDRoX
Senior Member
 
XDRoX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,908
Today I saw a stripped lower for $90. It had one of the trigger guard ears broken off

How's that for non mil spec?
XDRoX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 00:01   #4
fnfalman
Chicks Dig It
 
fnfalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: California & New Mexico, US
Posts: 56,522


Even if you were to buy a Prancing Pony, it still doesn't mean that you're getting "mil-spec".
__________________
Can you dig it?
fnfalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 00:29   #5
.45 Combat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 427
Getting a Leo marked Colt is mil spec.
.45 Combat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 03:45   #6
Leper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
Even if you were to buy a Prancing Pony, it still doesn't mean that you're getting "mil-spec".
What prancing pony other than Colt is out there? A current Colt is mil-spec and a better deal (non panic buy priced) than most of these cheap AR's that I see being justified here.
Leper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 04:54   #7
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by .45 Combat View Post
Getting a Leo marked Colt is mil spec.

No its not. Auto sear?

Its something other than Milspec. If it were Milspec it would be marked M4... Not LEO 6920 BS
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 06:20   #8
mgs
Always Carrying
 
mgs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: cogan station, pa, usa
Posts: 3,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnfalman View Post
Even if you were to buy a Prancing Pony, it still doesn't mean that you're getting "mil-spec".
That is very correct. Colt uses plenty of commercial parts and some dumb unique ones.

Last edited by mgs; 12-21-2012 at 06:20..
mgs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 06:37   #9
M&P15T
Beard One
 
M&P15T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Arlington, VA.
Posts: 10,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bird View Post
No its not. Auto sear?

Its something other than Milspec. If it were Milspec it would be marked M4... Not LEO 6920 BS
You do know that Colt is labeling their rifles "M4" now, don't you? LE6920 is long gone.

Still, dosen't mean anything.

Just to properly answer the OP's question, no "Mil Spec" doesn't mean anything to most panic buyers right at this very moment. It does to other folks, but those folks pretty much already have their ARs.
M&P15T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 06:38   #10
chief63
Senior Member
 
chief63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 251
It never mattered
chief63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 07:13   #11
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by M&P15T View Post
You do know that Colt is labeling their rifles "M4" now, don't you? LE6920 is long gone.

Still, dosen't mean anything.

Just to properly answer the OP's question, no "Mil Spec" doesn't mean anything to most panic buyers right at this very moment. It does to other folks, but those folks pretty much already have their ARs.
Oh Goody...so now we have "pretend" M4's.
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 07:28   #12
Tango 1Zero
Senior Member
 
Tango 1Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: OH
Posts: 853
Same crap as back in 94 ban. Hell Armalites and Bushmasters were the top of the pile.
People werent paying the prices collectors wanted for colts. Especially with their off center pins some had.
__________________
Gun Owners of America Life Member
Tango 1Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 08:02   #13
fuzzy03cls
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by chief63 View Post
It never mattered
For 90% of real world civialian use....

Funny how the POS bushmaster seemed to work just fine...
fuzzy03cls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 10:03   #14
Leper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy03cls View Post
For 90% of real world civialian use....

Funny how the POS bushmaster seemed to work just fine...
That is actually correct. For those that need range or safe queens it does not matter. For those of us that have these guns to possibly save our lives mil-spec or better matters.

Bushmaster is a low end company. Nothing wrong with owning one but lets not pretend they are anything other than what they are.
Leper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 10:22   #15
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leper View Post
That is actually correct. For those that need range or safe queens it does not matter. For those of us that have these guns to possibly save our lives mil-spec or better matters.

Bushmaster is a low end company. Nothing wrong with owning one but lets not pretend they are anything other than what they are.
Wrongo Leper

Bushmaster was top of the heap back in the good ole' days and they worked fine. Colt wasn't even in the civilian market at the time.
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 10:27   #16
Tango 1Zero
Senior Member
 
Tango 1Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: OH
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bird View Post
Wrongo Leper

Bushmaster was top of the heap back in the good ole' days and they worked fine. Colt wasn't even in the civilian market at the time.
Exactly! Friend of mine thats sniper qualified had a Bushmaster upper he took on deployments.
__________________
Gun Owners of America Life Member
Tango 1Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 10:35   #17
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango 1Zero View Post
Exactly! Friend of mine thats sniper qualified had a Bushmaster upper he took on deployments.
Not only that... Bushmaster, DPMS and Remington are all the same company now--Freedom Group.

Remington was recently awarded a contract for M4 rifles from the Army and provided they can overcome the appeal filed by Colt Defense they will be supplying MILSPEC rifles to our troops...
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 11:07   #18
Leper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bird View Post
Wrongo Leper

Bushmaster was top of the heap back in the good ole' days and they worked fine. Colt wasn't even in the civilian market at the time.
When was that? When where these good ole' days? I bought a Colt back in the 80's and it wasn't exactly a rare gun. Bushmaster guns work but they are not of the same quality. I have nothing against cheap gun and own a few myself but the gun that stays with me when I'm on duty is NOT a low end gun like Bushmaster. If pretending they are as good as a Colt makes people feel better about owning a cheap gun then that is a big deal but at the same time they shouldn't present what they think as a fact when it is not.
Leper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 11:13   #19
WinterWizard
Senior Member
 
WinterWizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leper View Post
When was that? When where these good ole' days? I bought a Colt back in the 80's and it wasn't exactly a rare gun. Bushmaster guns work but they are not of the same quality. I have nothing against cheap gun and own a few myself but the gun that stays with me when I'm on duty is NOT a low end gun like Bushmaster. If pretending they are as good as a Colt makes people feel better about owning a cheap gun then that is a big deal but at the same time they shouldn't present what they think as a fact when it is not.
Here we go. Only milspec gun is Colt. Bow down to the Colt gods.
WinterWizard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2012, 11:33   #20
Leper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by WinterWizard View Post
Here we go. Only milspec gun is Colt. Bow down to the Colt gods.
Only an idiot thinks that Colt is the only milspec gun. Sarcasm vs. facts is what you rely on?
Leper is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 570
147 Members
423 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31