GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2012, 07:49   #1
indoorplant
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tampa Bay, FLA
Posts: 3
Negligent Cop Sues Glock For Negligence...

California’s Second District Court of Appeal said on Tuesday that a paralyzed Los Angeles police officer, who was shot by his 3-year-old son, could move forward with his lawsuit again gun manufacturer Glock.

Enrique Chavez’s lawsuit claimed that the Glock 21 had a light trigger and lacked a grip saftey, both of which could have prevented the shooting.

Los Angeles Judge Kevin Brazile dismissed Chavez’s case two years ago, saying that he had failed to show that an alternate gun design would have prevented the shooting. Brazile also said that a police department review of the handgun showed that the advantages outweighed the risk.

But earlier this week, the state appeals court ruled 3-0 that the suit could move forward, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. After reviewing evidence presented by Chavez’s lawyers, the court found that a grip safety “would minimize the risk of accidental discharge without undermining performance.”

In 2006, Chavez’s son accidentally shot him in the back after the off-duty officer forgot that he had left the loaded .45-caliber pistol under the front seat of this Ford Ranger. The child was not in a safety seat at the time.

Link to story:
[URL="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/25/paralyzed-cop-suing-glock-after-his-3-year-old-son-shot-him/"]http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/25/paralyzed-cop-suing-glock-after-his-3-year-old-son-shot-him/[/URL]

so an off-duty LAPD, who forgot his Glock 21 underneath the front seat of his car and was shot by his three-year old who wasn't in his child safety seat, sues Glock for negligence...
indoorplant is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 17:20   #2
mykylg30
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 45
wow.that is seriously ridiculous. (face palm.)
mykylg30 is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 17:24   #3
NH Trucker
Needs coffee...
 
NH Trucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NH
Posts: 2,392
Interesting... I have a 4 year old, and have yet to be shot by her. Maybe it's because as a responsible parent, I don't leave it where she can get to it.


The guy is a victim of his own stupidity, nothing more.



posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire
__________________
PMS is like a tire fire. Trying to put it out just makes it worse. You just gotta grab a beer and let it burn.
NH Trucker is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 17:25   #4
Goodrich
Like a Sir
 
Goodrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 352
Herp derp.. it was his Negligence not Glocks, and if he wants to sue someone what about his department for issuing Glocks ?
Goodrich is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 17:30   #5
NEOH212
Diesel Girl
 
NEOH212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 9,094
Quote:
Negligent Cop Sues Glock For Negligence...
__________________
When you finish speaking, don't forget to wipe.
NEOH212 is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 17:46   #6
HKLovingIT
Resident Evil
 
HKLovingIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Out On The Tiles
Posts: 4,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by indoorplant View Post
California’s Second District Court of Appeal said on Tuesday that a paralyzed Los Angeles police officer, who was shot by his 3-year-old son, could move forward with his lawsuit again gun manufacturer Glock.

Enrique Chavez’s lawsuit claimed that the Glock 21 had a light trigger and lacked a grip saftey, both of which could have prevented the shooting.

Los Angeles Judge Kevin Brazile dismissed Chavez’s case two years ago, saying that he had failed to show that an alternate gun design would have prevented the shooting. Brazile also said that a police department review of the handgun showed that the advantages outweighed the risk.

But earlier this week, the state appeals court ruled 3-0 that the suit could move forward, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. After reviewing evidence presented by Chavez’s lawyers, the court found that a grip safety “would minimize the risk of accidental discharge without undermining performance.”

In 2006, Chavez’s son accidentally shot him in the back after the off-duty officer forgot that he had left the loaded .45-caliber pistol under the front seat of this Ford Ranger. The child was not in a safety seat at the time.

Link to story:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/2...-son-shot-him/

so an off-duty LAPD, who forgot his Glock 21 underneath the front seat of his car and was shot by his three-year old who wasn't in his child safety seat, sues Glock for negligence...
If events are is written, that is everything you need to know about this case right there. Next...
__________________
Jesus didn't have a stunt double, and neither do you...

кто пукнул здесь?
Nescio, sed foetet.

Last edited by HKLovingIT; 02-18-2013 at 17:47..
HKLovingIT is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 17:49   #7
Bren
NRA Life Member
 
Bren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 37,663
An officer in Kentucky tried this several years ago and didn't get far.
__________________
Quote:
This is the internet - you will never learn to shoot here.
- Me, 2014.
Bren is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 18:04   #8
oldman11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,976
It looks like people (and that includes politicians and judges) are not very smart, but they are greedy.
oldman11 is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 18:32   #9
MJB
Senior Member
 
MJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 614
Just because you can sue doesn't mean you can win.

I guess his department will all switch to 1911s or XDs.
MJB is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 18:41   #10
Scott30
Senior Member
 
Scott30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central VA
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren View Post
An officer in Kentucky tried this several years ago and didn't get far.
First clue of a STUPID lawsuit was CALIFORNIA. A few years ago, a guy sued a city after he got drunk and ran his car off the road into a tree and was injured. The city lost the case because they had planted the tree there. The defense was that if the tree was not planted there then he would have not been hurt. Guy got over 1 million dollars.
__________________
G26 G19 G23
G30 Big Dawg # 1549
J Frame Snubbie Club # 717
Scott30 is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 18:41   #11
pizza_pablo
USN Retired
 
pizza_pablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Western WA
Posts: 3,140
Hopefully, he is no longer able to breed.
__________________
If liberals don't want us to treat every Muslim like a terrorist, why do they treat every gun owner like the Newtown shooter?
pizza_pablo is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 19:15   #12
GicleeOne
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Southern New England
Posts: 141
Sad thing is, if he should win his suit against Glock I suspect we'll all be paying the freight in the form of higher pricing.

And I wouldn't take it as a given that he will lose, stranger things have happened.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GicleeOne is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 19:18   #13
G36shooter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Livingston Cnty. Mich.
Posts: 514
And this is why Andy had Barney carry only one bullet in his shirt pocket. It's the guns fault (sic)
G36shooter is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 19:26   #14
lyodbraun
Senior Member
 
lyodbraun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,571
Thats such a frivolous lawsuit, and as bad as someone trying to sue a car maker cause they crashed the car and its the MFGS fault... cause they couldn't control the vehicle... Id doubt he wins anything.... No ones fault but his OWN!!! RETARD self....
lyodbraun is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 19:33   #15
Scrappy
Senior Member
 
Scrappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 2,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by indoorplant View Post
California’s Second District Court of Appeal said on Tuesday , could move forward with his lawsuit again gun manufacturer Glock.

Enrique Chavez’s lawsuit claimed that the Glock 21 had a light trigger and lacked a grip saftey, both of which could have prevented the shooting.

the court found that a grip safety “would minimize the risk of accidental discharge without undermining performance.”

In 2006, Chavez’s son accidentally shot him in the back after the off-duty officer forgot that he had left the loaded .45-caliber pistol under the front seat of this Ford Ranger. The child was not in a safety seat at the time.


.
Wow, what a system we have! Many guns don't have safeties. This idiot cop should never of been a cop and this lawsuit is so bogus!! Stupid is as stupid does
__________________
Glock - N - Load
If this is a free country why does
it cost so much to live?
Scrappy is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 19:42   #16
Sdk8103
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 123
It used to be if you did something stupid you looked around and hoped nobody saw it. Today when some people do something stupid they get a lawyer and attempt to make someone else pay for their own stupidity. The lack of accepting responsibility is one of our country's biggest problems today in my opinion.
Sdk8103 is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 19:44   #17
D.S.Brown
Senior Member
 
D.S.Brown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,327
I know the guy is looking for a pay day, and maybe whatever insurance benefits he has have run out. Likewise I don't know if he gets any disability retirement from the city, as this was not a line of duty shooting. So maybe he's looking for money as a means to support his family, I don't know. I'm sure he isn't the first or the last paraplegic that has to work.

However it burns me that his mega act of negligence that impacts him, and his family is now having a rippling affect. He's fortunate that his son didn't accidentally turn the gun on himself, that would be a tragedy. This man has been granted the opportunity to act honorably and walk away from this frivolous suit once already. I am heartless about this. I hope he loses, and his forced to pay ALL fees from the first trial, and this one as well, and that he is truly left destitute and penniless. He's not dead, so this has to be the price of criminal negligence, (not securing his weapon), and dishonor, (not being a man and owning up to the fact that he is the sole cause of all of this).

Best,

Dave
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
D.S.Brown is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 19:47   #18
svtpwnz
Senior Member
 
svtpwnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 1,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyodbraun View Post
Thats such a frivolous lawsuit, and as bad as someone trying to sue a car maker cause they crashed the car and its the MFGS fault... cause they couldn't control the vehicle... Id doubt he wins anything.... No ones fault but his OWN!!! RETARD self....
Does Ford Explorer/Firestone tires bring back any memories.

Last edited by svtpwnz; 02-18-2013 at 19:47..
svtpwnz is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 19:49   #19
lyodbraun
Senior Member
 
lyodbraun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by svtpwnz View Post
Does Ford Explorer/Firestone tires bring back any memories.
Oh yeah forgot about that one, but that was the fault of the tyre makers if I remember right ??? but still this guy trying to sue over his own stupidity... please....
lyodbraun is offline  
Old 02-18-2013, 20:08   #20
iflyem1
Member
 
iflyem1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 407
I put the blame on the courts for letting this foolish lawsuit proceed. This is one of the things that is wrong with this country. Still the best place on earth but declining.
iflyem1 is offline  

 
  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 647
186 Members
461 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31