GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2012, 17:27   #21
MrMurphy
Lifetime Membership
*********
 
MrMurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Buried in the X-files
Posts: 31,712
Greg Coker kept a MOA or better group at over 1k yards (I think it was like 1,108m?) with a 16" OBR.

Others have done similarly. The gun can do it. The shooter typically, can not.

That said, the 20" would be better shooting a 1k than the 16". However, if he's primarily going to be a hogslayer with the occasional long shots, anything under 600 isn't all that terribly hard with one if you have a clue (which Travclem seems to) and getting into the 800+ range with any rifle is a challenge.

I've made repeated hits on a silhouette at 500m with a FN SCAR-H using crappy German ball ammo using a 3.5X TA11, and I wasn't even trying very hard. And the OBR is more accurate.......
__________________
"And Shepherds we shall be. For thee, my Lord for thee. Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to thee and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine Patris, et fili, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen."
MrMurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 20:01   #22
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMurphy View Post
Greg Coker kept a MOA or better group at over 1k yards (I think it was like 1,108m?) with a 16" OBR.

Others have done similarly. The gun can do it. The shooter typically, can not.

That said, the 20" would be better shooting a 1k than the 16". However, if he's primarily going to be a hogslayer with the occasional long shots, anything under 600 isn't all that terribly hard with one if you have a clue (which Travclem seems to) and getting into the 800+ range with any rifle is a challenge.

I've made repeated hits on a silhouette at 500m with a FN SCAR-H using crappy German ball ammo using a 3.5X TA11, and I wasn't even trying very hard. And the OBR is more accurate.......
Excellent! I think the 16" scored enough internetz to be my next rifle.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________
Travclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 20:41   #23
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 7,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travclem View Post
Excellent! I think the 16" scored enough internetz to be my next rifle.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
I doubt you'll have any complaints with a 16" OBR for your use, especially since you already have a 20" bolt gun.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
WoodenPlank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 21:45   #24
surf
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,019
For myself, if it is a rifle that I am going to be humping around and hunting with I prefer shorter and lighter. As mentioned 16" is not sweat IMO out to 800 and 1K is not out of reach. And if it was primarily a hunting rig etc, I would probably opt for the lighter LaRue.

For more long range work with good mobility I like 18"-19" as generally with most loads you will get a good burn out of 18". I have found that using 168gr FGMM from 26" cut down in 2" increments to 18" I am still dialing about the same dope to 500. Out to 1K I am dialing roughly 7 extra mins. Of course shooting ability and reading conditions is the key. I will stretch an 18" out to 1200 with good results also.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
surf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 05:20   #25
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by surf View Post
For myself, if it is a rifle that I am going to be humping around and hunting with I prefer shorter and lighter. As mentioned 16" is not sweat IMO out to 800 and 1K is not out of reach. And if it was primarily a hunting rig etc, I would probably opt for the lighter LaRue.

For more long range work with good mobility I like 18"-19" as generally with most loads you will get a good burn out of 18". I have found that using 168gr FGMM from 26" cut down in 2" increments to 18" I am still dialing about the same dope to 500. Out to 1K I am dialing roughly 7 extra mins. Of course shooting ability and reading conditions is the key. I will stretch an 18" out to 1200 with good results also.

I'm not a fan of the PredatArs pencil barrel. I do like the PredatOBR but they don't exist yet. Good info on the barrel cutting test.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________
Travclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 17:17   #26
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,766
Just placed my order.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________
Travclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 05:40   #27
TheBelly
Senior Member
 
TheBelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,211
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK_Stick View Post
I don't know that 4 inches, on a 308, is going to make much of a significant issue.

You're only talking maybe, 200 fps. Maybe. load, and individual rifle dependent.

So, what, maybe 1.5 inches difference? Just not seeing that as being much, if even noticeable.

200fps changes the distance where the bullet goes trans-sonic.

If I was going to reach out there, I'd get an 18" or a 20".
__________________
Family Values and Traditions

So 'true'. Nothing 'false' with a dog.
Either they love you, or they can't stand you.
RIP Lilly
TheBelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 05:42   #28
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBelly View Post
200fps changes the distance where the bullet goes trans-sonic.

If I was going to reach out there, I'd get an 18" or a 20".
Do you know by how much it changes the distance? Really too late now, I ordered the 16".


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________
Travclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 06:14   #29
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travclem View Post
Do you know by how much it changes the distance? Really too late now, I ordered the 16".


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
If you take a standard Federal Gold Medal Match load with the 175 grain bullet you will see a muzzle velocity of around 2650 fps with a 20" barrel. Trim it back to 16" and you are looking at about 2450 (I disagree with the 100 fps loss per inch--its more like 50 fps in my experience).

If you really want an eye opener look up the numbers for a Sierra 168 Gold Medal Match load and make the velocity adjustment for the shorter barrel and look where it goes sub-sonic. I can't tell you how many times I've seen people try to shoot that load at 1,000 yards with a short barrel gun and have been in the pits and have seen the bullets keyhole. I've had more than a few people here tell me I'm full of crap when I say this. But the ballistics calculator doesn't lie. Run the numbers for yourself. The 168 grain bullet is a crappy long range bullet for different reasons as well. But the retained velocity of this bullet out of a short barrel is pitiful.

Run the above numbers through any ballistics calculator and you will see that the 20" barrel keeps the 175 grain supersonic well out to ~1100 yards while the 16" barrel will be dropping below the supersonic barrier at ~1,000 yards. That's at sea level.

At 500 and beyond its the wind that gets you though and velocity matters in the wind. Its not the wind you can dope that gets you. (providing you can dope wind) Its the wind that you can't predict. I've personally used windage corrections at 1,000 yards that involved 30 quarter MOA clicks of applied windage--that's more than 7 feet of wind drift... If a small gust catches you bullet it will blow it 9-10 inches at 1,000. Again, velocity matters--and I should rephrase that to; RETAINED velocity matters most. Muzzle velocity is largely irrelevant except that it contributes to retained velocity downrange.

I'm unimpressed with people who tell me things like I've seen people make hits with a given platform at 1,000 yards etc. How many shots did it take to make a hit? Under what conditions? Known distance range? Sighters? Hell, if I throw enough lead downrange with my Colt Single Action I'm quite certain I can make hits at 500 yards...
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”

Last edited by Big Bird; 10-13-2012 at 06:57..
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 07:18   #30
TheBelly
Senior Member
 
TheBelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,211
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bird View Post
Insert all the stuff that Big Bird said...
Paraphrashing what big bird wrote:

Load development has a large role to play in where (along the flight path) a bullet will go into the subsonic speeds. BC of the projectile gets a vote here.

Environmental (particularly the density altitude and wind conditions) can wreak havoc on your attempts... Ballistic solvers are all well and good, but the bullet really tells you what's going on.

True the ballistic solver and then you have the no-crap answer as to what is happening between the internal and external ballistics of your rifle/bullet combo.
__________________
Family Values and Traditions

So 'true'. Nothing 'false' with a dog.
Either they love you, or they can't stand you.
RIP Lilly
TheBelly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 11:44   #31
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBelly View Post
Paraphrashing what big bird wrote:

Load development has a large role to play in where (along the flight path) a bullet will go into the subsonic speeds. BC of the projectile gets a vote here.

Environmental (particularly the density altitude and wind conditions) can wreak havoc on your attempts... Ballistic solvers are all well and good, but the bullet really tells you what's going on.

True the ballistic solver and then you have the no-crap answer as to what is happening between the internal and external ballistics of your rifle/bullet combo.
Its also been my experience in working up 1,000 yard loads that standard deviation means a lot in terms of accuracy. You take a .308 load of most any flavor with a standard deviation of between 30 and 40 FPS and you have a built in 1-1.5 MOA dispersion factor at 1,000 yards added to the mechanical accuracy of the platform. That's 10-12" load to load vertical dispersion on the target based solely on small velocity changes. I always tried to get my long range loads down to under 10 FPS Standard Deviation.
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 10:45   #32
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,766
Thread Resurrection.

Still waiting on the rifle but the suppressor is in. I think I have decided on the NF F1 3.5-15x50 with the NP-RF1 reticle and an Aimpoint T1 in a LaRue offset mount. I was going to get the H58/H59 reticle but the premium that reticle commands is the same price as the T1.

Anyone have any experience with this particular scope?
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________
Travclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 12:14   #33
Matthew Courtney
CLM Number 285
Instructor #298
 
Matthew Courtney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lake Charles
Posts: 5,988
I ended up with an 18 inch LR .308 because that is the longest rifle that I can easily handle getting in and out of my vehicles. Getting tangled up while trying to deploy a rifle is potentially a bigger issue for me than being limited to 987.2 yards. For those who enjoy 1000+ yard competitions, choose what works best for you.
__________________
You will never begin in the fight you have planned for. You will begin in the fight the other guy has planned for. Retreat in a manner that leads him into your fight should he press his attack.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Matthew Courtney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 12:18   #34
Matthew Courtney
CLM Number 285
Instructor #298
 
Matthew Courtney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lake Charles
Posts: 5,988
Would anybody else be interested in a .260 rem AR style rifle if one of the higher quality makers built one? That would be a sweet 18 inch rifle.
__________________
You will never begin in the fight you have planned for. You will begin in the fight the other guy has planned for. Retreat in a manner that leads him into your fight should he press his attack.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
Matthew Courtney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 12:31   #35
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Courtney View Post
Would anybody else be interested in a .260 rem AR style rifle if one of the higher quality makers built one? That would be a sweet 18 inch rifle.
I think that would be really cool for long range. The .260 flat smokes the .308 at long ranges.
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________

Last edited by Travclem; 11-30-2012 at 12:31..
Travclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 14:41   #36
MrMurphy
Lifetime Membership
*********
 
MrMurphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Buried in the X-files
Posts: 31,712
Trav I've shot that scope, on an OBR, but only at 100m.
__________________
"And Shepherds we shall be. For thee, my Lord for thee. Power hath descended forth from thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to thee and teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine Patris, et fili, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen."
MrMurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012, 20:40   #37
Travclem
Lifetime Membership
Badass Member
 
Travclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 6,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMurphy View Post
Trav I've shot that scope, on an OBR, but only at 100m.
Seems to be everyone's experience. I guess I'll just have to cough up the $2300 and try it out.
__________________
Sent from a payphone in a whorehouse in Mexico.
__________________
Travclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 07:41   #38
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
 
Big Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Travclem View Post
I think that would be really cool for long range. The .260 flat smokes the .308 at long ranges.

Maybe handloaded it does. But I don't see any off the shelf ammo that will do it. All the commercial ammo I've seen is mostly 300 yard deer loads.
__________________
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 08:27   #39
banjobob
Senior Member
 
banjobob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,089
TravClem, I'm very jealous. I have an AR10T that sucks and is getting a new barrel as we speak. I have no idea how much money I spent on trips to the range, load development, shipping costs to armalite for 2 new barrels before I threw the towel in and acknowledged armalite sucked. I now am paying for a bartlein to be put on it and would have been so much better off with an OBR.

During that process I bought the 5.56 OBR in 18" It is magnificent, test group was slightly over 1/2 minute. I can consistently shoot it the same and sometimes better.

The lesson I learned was to buy quality once and be done with it. As a fellow Texan, I'm sure you will also share an extra source of pride looking at a silhouette of Texas on the side of your rifle. Good for you.
banjobob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 08:38   #40
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 7,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjobob View Post
TravClem, I'm very jealous. I have an AR10T that sucks and is getting a new barrel as we speak. I have no idea how much money I spent on trips to the range, load development, shipping costs to armalite for 2 new barrels before I threw the towel in and acknowledged armalite sucked. I now am paying for a bartlein to be put on it and would have been so much better off with an OBR.

During that process I bought the 5.56 OBR in 18" It is magnificent, test group was slightly over 1/2 minute. I can consistently shoot it the same and sometimes better.

The lesson I learned was to buy quality once and be done with it. As a fellow Texan, I'm sure you will also share an extra source of pride looking at a silhouette of Texas on the side of your rifle. Good for you.
We call it "Buy once, cry once."
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
WoodenPlank is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:55.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,014
288 Members
726 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31