Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2012, 02:04   #41
PrecisionRifleman
Senior Member
 
PrecisionRifleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Steve View Post
Yeah, but you don't have 17+1 capacity.

__________________
PrecisionRifleman

G20SF
Gen4 G23
PrecisionRifleman is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 16:02   #42
attrapereves
Senior Member
 
attrapereves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren View Post
The they have an awful lot of shootings where numerous hits fail to stop or kill, good guys and bad, that they have to ignore.
I think a lot of this comes from the fact that 9mm is the most widely used handgun caliber. Most thugs tend to buy the cheapest ammo, and often have poor shooting skills. Bad ammo + bad shot placement = failure to stop. NYPD issues the G19 and there have been many reports of one-shot stops.

I carry a 9mm, 45ACP, or 10mm Glock depending on my mood. I like them all for different reasons. However, I find that I have tighter groups and just shoot better with the 9mm.

Last edited by attrapereves; 11-20-2012 at 16:02..
attrapereves is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 16:51   #43
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by attrapereves View Post
I think a lot of this comes from the fact that 9mm is the most widely used handgun caliber. Most thugs tend to buy the cheapest ammo, and often have poor shooting skills. Bad ammo + bad shot placement = failure to stop. NYPD issues the G19 and there have been many reports of one-shot stops.

I carry a 9mm, 45ACP, or 10mm Glock depending on my mood. I like them all for different reasons. However, I find that I have tighter groups and just shoot better with the 9mm.
The 9mm never had a great reputation as a stopper no matter what bullet was in it, or how much it cost, until relatively recently in the cartridge's lifespan. Up until (depending on who you talk to) sometime in the 1990's when bullet design "picked up". Pretty much the SD ammo until then stunk on ice or was still "experimental".
countrygun is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 17:00   #44
WiskyT
Malcontent
 
WiskyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Steve View Post
Yeah, but you don't have 17+1 capacity.

True, that's why I carry a G27
__________________
Drugs are bad because if you do drugs you're a hippie and hippies suck.
Eric Cartman


"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."-General Curtis E. LeMay
WiskyT is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 17:05   #45
Warp
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Warp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NE of Atlanta
Posts: 30,209
9mm still doesn't equal .357
__________________
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

I HIGHLY recommend Google Chrome and Adblock to all world wide web users. (I would have left GT a long time ago without these extensions!)
Warp is online now  
Old 11-20-2012, 18:56   #46
Andy W
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,946
I'm not sure I'd want to shoot this stuff through my m&p. for one its not gonna be pleasant to shoot and 2) I'm not sure it's safe.

Give me some Speer Gold Dots or 147 grain HSTs

Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine

Last edited by Andy W; 11-20-2012 at 18:57..
Andy W is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 22:00   #47
TWS G26
Senior Member
 
TWS G26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,078


Quote:
Originally Posted by WinterWizard View Post
And per usual with 9mm bullets pushed beyond their velocity limits, the penetration sucks.

Also, 501 ft/lbs doesn't come close to full power .357 Magnum loads. Shoot some 125gr Buffalo Bore .357 loads @ 1700 fps and tell me if these 115gr Underwood loads come close. I'll save you the time: they don't.

Sorry, this thread is a fail.
Velocity is quite impressive, and the energy....but yes, those bullets were pushed beyond the envelope. I know, because I'm looking at them on my desk. :-)

In the real world, I have to think they WILL NOT expand like that.
__________________
SHOOTING VIDEOS and AMMO TESTING:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
TWS G26 is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 11:41   #48
Andy W
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by attrapereves View Post
I think a lot of this comes from the fact that 9mm is the most widely used handgun caliber. Most thugs tend to buy the cheapest ammo, and often have poor shooting skills. Bad ammo + bad shot placement = failure to stop. NYPD issues the G19 and there have been many reports of one-shot stops.

I carry a 9mm, 45ACP, or 10mm Glock depending on my mood. I like them all for different reasons. However, I find that I have tighter groups and just shoot better with the 9mm.
I concur with your thoughts. However. I'd also like to add that there have also been numerous failures to stop with .40s and .45s in handguns. There was one a few years back where a BG was shot like 17 times center mass with .40 180 grain Gold Dots and .223 Hornady TAP and he was still fighting when the responding officers cuffed him. He didn't die until later in the hostpital. I remember another similar incident with the .40 round. Before caliber or expansion even become an issue, rounds need to 1.) penetrate deep enough to hit the vitals and 2.) said rounds have to actually hit and damage something vital. In the aforementioned case, the FBI actually investigated the shooting and determined yes, they shot the suspect a whole bunch of times and yes, the .40 rounds had penetrated deep enough (.223 rounds did not) and expanded but none of the rounds which struck the assailant hit anything that would quickly stop the fight ie: CNS, heart, lungs, major arteries, liver.

So, before we blame a failure to stop on the fact the shooter used a 9mm, we first need to consider whether or not penetraton and shot placement were adequate before we should even consider whether he should have used a bigger caliber. Yes, .40 and .45 will inflict more damage than 9mm in an equally placed shot but that doesn't mean much if you don't hit anything vital.
Andy W is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 11:50   #49
Andy W
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by countrygun View Post
The 9mm never had a great reputation as a stopper no matter what bullet was in it, or how much it cost, until relatively recently in the cartridge's lifespan. Up until (depending on who you talk to) sometime in the 1990's when bullet design "picked up". Pretty much the SD ammo until then stunk on ice or was still "experimental".
Just an observation. Because the 9mm is a smaller round, the hollowpoint cavity is inherently smaller than in a larger caliber. All early hollowpoint designs were suseptible to plugging but the 9mm especially so because the cavities were smaller than in, for instance, a .45 ACP. Even barring the cavity being plugged with cloth or something, there is significantly less room for stuff to get into the cavity and facilitate expansion. I remember reading something, I believe by Mas Ayoob, who said that was the reason behind the 9mm Hydra-Shoks poor performance compared to the same design in .40 or even more so in .45. The 9mm has a smaller cavity to begin with and when you put a post in the middle of it, that leaves even less room.
Andy W is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 13:42   #50
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warp View Post
9mm still doesn't equal .357
Agreed.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 18:11   #51
WilliamDahl
Senior Member
 
WilliamDahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: TX Gulf Coast
Posts: 229
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
I don't care who it is, or how hard they try - they'll never get the 9x19 cartridge to propel a 158gr SJHP at 1400-1500 FPS. The barrel length won't matter, either.
Never say never... I suspect that with the right single shot pistol loaded with a full compressed case of an extremely fast powder while also having an extremely thick barrel, it would be possible. Basically a controlled explosion...
WilliamDahl is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 18:47   #52
unit1069
Senior Member
 
unit1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Central US
Posts: 8,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy W View Post
I remember reading something, I believe by Mas Ayoob, who said that was the reason behind the 9mm Hydra-Shoks poor performance compared to the same design in .40 or even more so in .45. The 9mm has a smaller cavity to begin with and when you put a post in the middle of it, that leaves even less room.
I've read that Federal HST is actually the Hydra-Shok bullet without the post. (AKA "Hydra-Shok Two")

Whether it's a tweaked HS or not HST amazes me with its consistent expansion in all calibers.
__________________
Rocket Scientist
unit1069 is offline  
Old 11-21-2012, 21:42   #53
Andy W
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by unit1069 View Post
I've read that Federal HST is actually the Hydra-Shok bullet without the post. (AKA "Hydra-Shok Two")

Whether it's a tweaked HS or not HST amazes me with its consistent expansion in all calibers.
It may be based on a hydra-shok without the post but that's definitely not all they've done. Look at the slits in the jacket on the HST and also the shape of the round when expanded then compare to a similar caliber and weight hydra-shok. Definitely not the same bullet. I've read Federal puts wire framework in the bullets to give them that consistent flower shape upon expansion.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
Andy W is offline  
Old 11-24-2012, 17:00   #54
Ike Arumba
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 29
Ballistics By The Inch's 9mm page at http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/9luger.html shows one load with a heavy bullet, the 147gr Hydra-Shok. They measured 1007 fps out of a 5 inch barrel, 1067 fps out of a 10 inch barrel, and a max of 1096 fps out of a 17 inch barrel. There just isn't enough powder capacity in that case to gain much advantage from a long barrel using a heavy bullet. I doubt that monkeying around with faster powders generating excessive pressures will push this up to anywhere near 357 mag velocity.
Ike Arumba is offline  
Old 11-24-2012, 18:32   #55
Kingarthurhk
Isaiah 53:4-9
 
Kingarthurhk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by kswiss View Post
115 grain +p+ 1450 FPS and 501 ft/lbs!!!! HOLY ****


Underwood 9mm 115 gr +P+ JHP Ammo Test - YouTube
40 grain .22LR 1,400 FPS. Whoopdi Doo.
__________________
Glock 17, 19, 20SF, 21C, 22, 26, 27, Glock E-Tool, Glock knife
Quod ego haereticus appellari sequere Jesum.
Kingarthurhk is offline  
Old 11-24-2012, 18:49   #56
jlavallee
Senior Member
 
jlavallee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 816
I love the 9mm but it is in the mid range of SD along with the .45 ACP and .40 S&W.

.357 Mag can go to a much higher level as long as it has the barrel legnth where it is more of a hunting round than a SD round as can the 10mm.

The loads sold by manufacturers as SD loads are all pretty similar and are designed to meet the general FBI specs and such. I can load one of my .357's with a really hot load and if it goes through the target then energy was wasted and now even if I hit, I have a bullet looking for a backstop. Not good.

Lots of folks like to make two holes when they hunt, that is not a good idea in SD. 400-500 ft.lbs in a human is what seems to work well.
__________________
Someday, I may be found lying dead in a ditch somewhere, but Iíll be lying in a pile of brass.

Track bills in Congress and tell politicians your opinion.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
jlavallee is offline  
Old 11-24-2012, 18:52   #57
uz2bUSMC
10mm defender
 
uz2bUSMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: J-Ville NC
Posts: 3,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingarthurhk View Post
40 grain .22LR 1,400 FPS. Whoopdi Doo.
174 vs 501ft lbs
__________________
- Without idiots, there would be no baseline for common sense.

- "Our country went through a transition during the last election where the parasites came together and outnumbered the hosts." -jdavionic
uz2bUSMC is offline  
Old 11-24-2012, 20:23   #58
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy W View Post
Just an observation. Because the 9mm is a smaller round, the hollowpoint cavity is inherently smaller than in a larger caliber. All early hollowpoint designs were suseptible to plugging but the 9mm especially so because the cavities were smaller than in, for instance, a .45 ACP. Even barring the cavity being plugged with cloth or something, there is significantly less room for stuff to get into the cavity and facilitate expansion. I remember reading something, I believe by Mas Ayoob, who said that was the reason behind the 9mm Hydra-Shoks poor performance compared to the same design in .40 or even more so in .45. The 9mm has a smaller cavity to begin with and when you put a post in the middle of it, that leaves even less room.

.355 vs.357 whoopie.

But the 9mm has to be shaped to feed and not deform on the feed ramp.

I had some of the early HSs in .38 which were basically a Hollow based wadcutter reversed with a post. they were impressive, but, there is always a point of diminishing returns with everything and unfrtunately humans are slow to grasp this. We think "If a certain velocity is good, then more must be better."

As one poster has pointed out a bullet that goes through and through spends less energy on the target than one at less velocity that remains in the target. It is also that way with expansion but it is very hard to get peple to grasp. The only "energy" that can cause the expansion of a bullet is that which the bullet itself brought with it. In essence the bullet spends a prtion of it's energy on itself, of course mangling tissue in the bargain. But it is that nasty "diminishing returns" issue that makes it fodder for speculation.

Ihe 9mm HS with the post is an example of something not being a "great idea across the board". If you took a .38/.357 bullet, gave it the same profile and incresed the cavity opening proportionate to the extra.002" and fired it at the same velocity into the same medium I doubt there would be much difference.

What is overlooked, when people start choosing up sides and picking their favrite paradigm to defend, is the completely uncontrolable variables involve in external ballistics in the SD/Gunfighting" realm. Everything from the target weight it's BMI fluid in the tissues, clothing, angle of shot, and many other factors play into "what would be the perfect round for THIS situation?".

I have faced it, for instance, in chosing a hunting bullet for deer. Lets say I happen to know, that if I drive a fast expanding 130gn .308 bullet at top speed it will flatted a deer, if I get the "picture perfect broadside shot, in it's tracks. On the other hand a shot where the deer is quartering may have the problem of the bullet blowing up on a large bone. If I choose say a 165gn bullet it would smash throught a hipbone and reach vitals, but on a broadside shot it will likely break a rib on the way in, expand a bit, hopefully hit the vitals and break a rib or two as it exits to spend it's energy on something else. I can almost promise it will not drop the deer as fast as the lighter fast expanding bullet.

This is similar to the choices we make with SD ammo, couple it with the fact that the "deer" is likely shooting back, and all the other variables and we shuld be askiking "How Many Guns Do you carry to meet all the possiblilities?" We each have to make a choice and before we are critical of the chices of others, bear in mind "every handgun round .22 lr and up up HAS stopped someone, somewhere, with one shot and every handgun round from .22lr up HAS failed to stop someone, somewhere, with one shot."

Handguns suck at stopping people but they fit on the belt nicely. Your choice might work or it might not, same with the other guy's. But at least you both made a choice and that is 99% of the fight anyway.
countrygun is offline  
Old 11-24-2012, 23:14   #59
Scoob
Senior Member
 
Scoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 464
Yeah I'm sorry but 9mm will never be 357 magnum or even 357 sig. What 9mm has in it's favor is low recoil and high capacity. That is a great thing and 9mm is my second favorite cartridge for that reason.
Scoob is offline  
Old 11-25-2012, 09:44   #60
Suby
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 47
Am I the only one thankful that 9mm is not equal to a .357 magnum? cost, blast, weight? I love my 6" 357 magnum but I have only carried it in the woods I carry my 9mm 24/7 365.
when I hear people saying they would never carry anything less powerful than a ."357 MAGNUM" I ask them if I can see it...they walk to their safe and get it out and show me, I then laugh.
Suby is offline  

 
  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:57.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,036
289 Members
747 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31