Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2012, 18:42   #21
damnyankee20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 180
I think recoil is partly psychological. I am a small guy and I feel no difference between my G20 and my buddy's 9mm Beretta. And my buddy's dad is in his 70s and he shakes so bad he can't hit a target, but he fires off my G20 10mm reloads with no problem with a ****eating grin saying [about the G20]: "I LIKE IT!!!".
damnyankee20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2012, 22:12   #22
PghJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,815
The recoil is less in the 115 or 125gr 357 sig than either the 155 or 165gr 40 S&W. The 180 gr 40 is about the same as the sig. Although I have some 40 S&W barrels, I never shoot the 40 anymore. For me it has more to do with the recoil characteristic than raw energy. With the 155 or 165gr 40, the light weight Glock twists in my hand during recoil while the sig goes directly up and back. One of the local LE departments that shoots at my range is have problems with hand and wrist pain which they believe is due to practicing with the 40. They use the Ranger T 165gr load, but they are contemplating a caliber switch.
PghJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 16:40   #23
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
I would think

Quote:
Originally Posted by PghJim View Post
The recoil is less in the 115 or 125gr 357 sig than either the 155 or 165gr 40 S&W. The 180 gr 40 is about the same as the sig. Although I have some 40 S&W barrels, I never shoot the 40 anymore. For me it has more to do with the recoil characteristic than raw energy. With the 155 or 165gr 40, the light weight Glock twists in my hand during recoil while the sig goes directly up and back. One of the local LE departments that shoots at my range is have problems with hand and wrist pain which they believe is due to practicing with the 40. They use the Ranger T 165gr load, but they are contemplating a caliber switch.
That the muzzle blast of the .357 Sig is very noticeable.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 22:21   #24
PghJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
That the muzzle blast of the .357 Sig is very noticeable.
That may be true, but I do not notice any difference with hearing protection on at an outside range over the 40 or 45. The blast is significantly less than the 357 magnum it seeks to copy.
PghJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 12:30   #25
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by PghJim View Post
That may be true, but I do not notice any difference with hearing protection on at an outside range over the 40 or 45. The blast is significantly less than the 357 magnum it seeks to copy.
True. The .357 Magnum has a ferocious muzzle blast.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 12:42   #26
Billy10mm
Senior Member
 
Billy10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hartsdale, NY
Posts: 1,257
The difference in price (given the amount I shoot) is the deal breaker for me between the two rounds. Other than that I could/would shoot/carry either, though I would likely prefer the .40 for the additional bullet weight/size.
__________________
Billy
Glock 23
Fusion Tact-5 in 10mm
H&K P30S 9mm
Ruger SR22
Billy10mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 14:13   #27
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy10mm View Post
The difference in price (given the amount I shoot) is the deal breaker for me between the two rounds. Other than that I could/would shoot/carry either, though I would likely prefer the .40 for the additional bullet weight/size.
So the .357 Sig must be an expensive cartridge . . .
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 16:35   #28
dkf
Senior Member
 
dkf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,747
I reload .357sig for less money than .40 and slightly more than 9mm. The .357sig uses a little more powder than the 9x19 so that is why it costs slightly more.
dkf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 20:45   #29
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf View Post
I reload .357sig for less money than .40 and slightly more than 9mm. The .357sig uses a little more powder than the 9x19 so that is why it costs slightly more.
With a .40-cal rim and body out to the shoulder, I would think that it can hold a LOT more powder than the 9x19. But then again, the .40 case is only one millimeter wider.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:38.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,184
295 Members
889 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31