[old_pigpen]

Originally Posted by RetailNinja

You disappointed this one buy getting only 60 rounds

It was all I could afford right now. Money is tight, thanks to four years of Obama.

Seriously, now that he was reelected I have two very good chances of losing my non-LE day job next year. If I somehow manage not to lose my job, I can expect a $10,000 pay cut by June.

To quote Vigilant: Buck Farack!

[old_pigpen]

Originally Posted by t4terrific

Fuhk her up her stupid a$s!

Not even with YOUR winkie!

[walkin' trails]

Wonder how much money Feinstein's stock portfolio is earning off of ammo manufacturers and gun companies that manufacture ARs? The one thing the libs do consistently is prostitute themselves for financial gain.

I would not worry so much about a new ban during the next two years. What I'd be more concerned about is the left's ability to manipulate voters and the 2014 outcome and impose upon us a pre 1994 congress that just doesn't care. In my own red state, which held for Romney and Republicans, the gap between Romney and Obama was surprisingly narrow indicating there are a lot more idiots around me than I realize, or somehow they managed to increase voter fraud despite the voter ID law.

[lawman800]

Originally Posted by walkin' trails

Wonder how much money Feinstein's stock portfolio is earning off of ammo manufacturers and gun companies that manufacture ARs? The one thing the libs do consistently is prostitute themselves for financial gain.

I would not worry so much about a new ban during the next two years. What I'd be more concerned about is the left's ability to manipulate voters and the 2014 outcome and impose upon us a pre 1994 congress that just doesn't care. In my own red state, which held for Romney and Republicans, the gap between Romney and Obama was surprisingly narrow indicating there are a lot more idiots around me than I realize, or somehow they managed to increase voter fraud despite the voter ID law.

Fraud knows no bounds... fake ID's are easy to make, and absentee ballot requests have no ID requirement.

[FireForged]

I think that the only way a new AWB can be enacted would be by executive order. I really dont think Obama would be willing to do it in that manner.

[MRex21]

Originally Posted by FireForged

I think that the only way a new AWB can be enacted would be by executive order. I really dont think Obama would be willing to do it in that manner.

I want to believe that. I really do.

[ateamer]

Why do people keep voting for Finkelswine? She and the joker haven't done a damned thing for California.

[MRex21]

It's no more than sheer numbers. There's more liberals in the San Fransicko and Los Angeles areas than there are in all of the rural areas in the state.

They just have more.

[Morris]

It's no more than sheer numbers. There's more liberals in the San Fransicko and Los Angeles areas than there are in all of the rural areas in the state.

They just have more.

Same for Washington and Oregon.

[lawman800]

Even NY... upstate and other regions are very conservative, but NYC just dominates the whole state's politics.

I was so mad... I cast my votes (paper ballot with markers) at 1930 hours, and by 2100 hours, they already called it for the state for Obama... and I know they haven't even bothered counting my ballots. Why do they even let us vote then? To give the pretense that we have a say?

[NEOH212]

Originally Posted by DaBigBR

If I were a betting man, I would bet against any success with such a ban attempt. Something gets written up almost every year and never goes anywhere. The 1994 was a battle won on the way to losing a war for its liberal crafters, and one thing that I know, as does everyone else, is that there will be no incumbent president running next term.

If I was a betting woman, I'd be willing to bet they would have one hell of a bloody time enforcing it should it be passed.

[NEOH212]

Originally Posted by Vigilant

Buck Farack.

Amen!

[Vigilant]

Originally Posted by NEOH212

Amen!

[Poohgyrr]

We shouldn't be surprised; renewing the ban is part of the Democratic platform and they have been after this forever.

FWIW; computers can count without any problem - but when they print out the "total number", it can be any number you tell the computer to print.

And remember that the media, and all the political parties, are not discussing quite a few things that have been happening.

Oppressive Governments always control weapons, the media, and education.

Bad people have always been around, and eternal vigilance is part of the price of freedom.

I need a donut and cup of coffee..............

[Deployment Solu]

[QUOTE=old_pigpen;19613477]And his Wookie Mooshelle too!


Hey!! Hey!! How can you insult Wookies like that?? Didn't you see Star Wars??LOL!!!

[steveksux]

Originally Posted by lawman800

Even NY... upstate and other regions are very conservative, but NYC just dominates the whole state's politics.

I was so mad... I cast my votes (paper ballot with markers) at 1930 hours, and by 2100 hours, they already called it for the state for Obama... and I know they haven't even bothered counting my ballots. Why do they even let us vote then? To give the pretense that we have a say?

I feel your pain. But honestly, it's California. I could have called it for Obama at 19:35 hours. On Jan 21, 2008... Doesn't it always go Dem? I just assumed, as liberal as everyone says it is... Although I guess it's had Repub governor before....

Randy

posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire

[lawman800]

[quote=Deployment Solu;19618814]

Originally Posted by old_pigpen

And his Wookie Mooshelle too!


Hey!! Hey!! How can you insult Wookies like that?? Didn't you see Star Wars??LOL!!!

[merlynusn]

Originally Posted by lawman800

Even NY... upstate and other regions are very conservative, but NYC just dominates the whole state's politics.

I was so mad... I cast my votes (paper ballot with markers) at 1930 hours, and by 2100 hours, they already called it for the state for Obama... and I know they haven't even bothered counting my ballots. Why do they even let us vote then? To give the pretense that we have a say?

Short answer, Yes. Elections give the people hope as opposed to understanding it's all preordained. Can you imagine if you didn't have that small sliver of hope that it would matter? It would break down the system just because people would get pissed off they didn't have a say.

[lawman800]

Originally Posted by merlynusn

Short answer, Yes. Elections give the people hope as opposed to understanding it's all preordained. Can you imagine if you didn't have that small sliver of hope that it would matter? It would break down the system just because people would get pissed off they didn't have a say.

They made it pretty obvious this time, didn't they?

[merlynusn]

Originally Posted by lawman800

They made it pretty obvious this time, didn't they?

Yes they did. But this is also the first time in a while that people are really aware of it. That's why the next few years are going to be interesting.

[Clutch Cargo]

Originally Posted by Vigilant

Don't let it eat you up. You're letting her control you. Rest assured, she will get what is coming to her.

THAT could get enough votes to pass a law.

[JuneyBooney]

Originally Posted by RetailNinja

How many democrats are in the chambers now that were around in 1994 and remember what happened then? Any Dem touching this (except for those who represent the very liberal bastions) might as well be pulling the ejection lever.

Tha problem is that people don't have long memories. They forget and then they have to be hit with a hammer again.

[Vigilant]

Originally Posted by JuneyBooney

Tha problem is that people don't have long memories. They forget and then they have to be hit with a hammer again.

There you go, talking about me again.

[Vigilant]

Wait for it........

Buck Farack.

[Newcop761]

Buck Farack and Beinstein.



posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire