Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2012, 02:26   #101
Inebriated
Senior Member
 
Inebriated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,133
If you don't hit a vital organ or structure, you will not stop a fight. Simple as that. I don't care if it's with a .45 ACP that expanded to 3 FEET, if you miss vitals, you aren't winning. Handguns (9mm, .40, .45) don't do a thing but poke holes, JHP or not, and a .357" hole in the Aorta is just as effective as a .45" hole. I would prefer to use something designed to penetrate, and get to what it needs to put a hole in, than use something designed to STOP MOVING inside the body. So if I didn't have to worry about every round going passing through a bad guy, and potentially wounding someone innocent, I would carry FMJ and be just as content, if not more.
__________________
Kalashnikov Klub Member #870
Black Rifle Club Member #2L8
The 21 Club Member #19691

Last edited by Inebriated; 10-24-2012 at 02:29..
Inebriated is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 07:20   #102
RichardB
Silver Membership
Senior Member
 
RichardB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 1,449
I don't know that the big hole, small hole theory has much to do with reality.

Marshal & Sanow developed data which depicts 9mm FMJ and 45ACP FMJ as roughly comparable in stopping power (I don't sweat the small % of difference). Their numbers shattered the balloons of others and the war was on.

Decades later another cop, Greg Ellifritz, has published his own numbers, using different criteria and he also finds the 45 and 9mm Parabellum are not that far apart. Ellifritz's bottom line is: For serious fighting use a rifle or shotgun.

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/printable/node/7866

Excerpts of Ellifritz's paper.

9mm Luger
# of people shot - 456
# of hits - 1121
% of hits that were fatal - 24%
Average number of rounds until incapacitation - 2.45
% of people who were not incapacitated - 13%
One-shot-stop % - 34%
Accuracy (head and torso hits) - 74%
% actually incapacitated by one shot (torso or head hit) - 47%

45 ACP
# of people shot - 209
# of hits - 436
% of hits that were fatal - 29%
Average number of rounds until incapacitation - 2.08
% of people who were not incapacitated - 14%
One-shot-stop % - 39%
Accuracy (head and torso hits) - 85%
% actually incapacitated by one shot (torso or head hit) - 51%

Based on this study one should be prepared to need more than one round to neutralize a serious threat.
__________________
Richard

“Food for thought is no substitute for the real thing”
RichardB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 08:16   #103
digilo
Senior Member
 
digilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: texas
Posts: 303
Use FMJ only if that's all your gun will feed. Otherwise use of HP is prudent. Gabrielle Gifford was shot in the head with a 9mm FMJ, and shes recovering.

Can't get much better shot placement than that.

Had the bullet been HP instead of FMJ, no way she'd have recovered.

Also, anyone care to speculate on her chances had she been shot in the head with .45 ACP FMJ, instead of 9mm FMJ??
__________________
Taste the wares, Email.
digilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 08:56   #104
M 7
Senior Member
 
M 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardB View Post
I don't know that the big hole, small hole theory has much to do with reality.

Marshal & Sanow developed data which depicts 9mm FMJ and 45ACP FMJ as roughly comparable in stopping power (I don't sweat the small % of difference). Their numbers shattered the balloons of others and the war was on.
I am not sure that any valid conclusion(s) can be drawn from the Marshall and Sanow data due to the fact that the data appears to have been intentionally manipulated.

http://www.firearmstactical.com/mars...l-analysis.htm

The statistical analysis (in the link above) is pretty damning unless one is willing to believe that a one in three trillion chance is a good bet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardB View Post
Decades later another cop, Greg Ellifritz, has published his own numbers, using different criteria and he also finds the 45 and 9mm Parabellum are not that far apart. Ellifritz's bottom line is: For serious fighting use a rifle or shotgun.

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/printable/node/7866

Excerpts of Ellifritz's paper.

9mm Luger
# of people shot - 456
# of hits - 1121
% of hits that were fatal - 24%
Average number of rounds until incapacitation - 2.45
% of people who were not incapacitated - 13%
One-shot-stop % - 34%
Accuracy (head and torso hits) - 74%
% actually incapacitated by one shot (torso or head hit) - 47%

45 ACP
# of people shot - 209
# of hits - 436
% of hits that were fatal - 29%
Average number of rounds until incapacitation - 2.08
% of people who were not incapacitated - 14%
One-shot-stop % - 39%
Accuracy (head and torso hits) - 85%
% actually incapacitated by one shot (torso or head hit) - 51%

Based on this study one should be prepared to need more than one round to neutralize a serious threat.
While the study done by Ellifritz seems to be seriously flawed, it appears for the time being, that his data was not manipulated. It would've been nice to see a more detailed break-down of his data like the brand, type (JHP or FMJ) and weight of the ammo involved, separate categories for "head" and "torso" shots, etc.

Some of his conclusions are a little goofy, but to his credit he seems to have offered an honest attempt at analyzing the data he collected.
__________________
For those who CCW:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by M 7; 10-24-2012 at 09:03..
M 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 12:14   #105
Tiro Fijo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by M 7 View Post
I am not sure that any valid conclusion(s) can be drawn from the Marshall and Sanow data due to the fact that the data appears to have been intentionally manipulated...

That is pure hyperbole & conjecture based upon opinions of those whose theory the data didn't support, i.e., the Facklerites. Those who were in the know during that time confirmed what was revealed in the data: that the .357 Mag. & the 9mm 115 gr. +p+ JHP were deadly. Ask anyone who was on the Border Patrol in the 80's or the IL State Police as well.
Tiro Fijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 13:29   #106
M 7
Senior Member
 
M 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiro Fijo View Post
That is pure hyperbole & conjecture based upon opinions of those whose theory the data didn't support, i.e., the Facklerites. Those who were in the know during that time confirmed what was revealed in the data: that the .357 Mag. & the 9mm 115 gr. +p+ JHP were deadly. Ask anyone who was on the Border Patrol in the 80's or the IL State Police as well.
Lighten up, dude.

If you'll take the time to read the linked material you'll see that there is no hyperbole or conjecture-

http://www.firearmstactical.com/mars...l-analysis.htm

the statistical analysis is well done and the results are clearly documented for all to see, or at least, for those who will see.

Just 'cause you don't like it doesn't mean that it is not a valid analysis. The M&S stuff has HUGE issues, unless of course a 1 chance in 3 trillion plus of being legitimate is a good thing.

See, I got no skin in the game, so I don't care. "Light & fast", "slow & heavy", or somewhere "in between"- it's all good.
__________________
For those who CCW:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by M 7; 10-24-2012 at 15:29..
M 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 17:23   #107
federali
Senior Member
 
federali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Oceanside, NY, USA
Posts: 1,346
.45 acp fmj

FMJ .45 ACP, like 9mm FMJ, has a long track record against human adversaries. While I haven't heard much about 9mm FMJ, .45 FMJ has a very good track record, so much so that some people prefer them to JHC as the FMJs are probably the best feeding .45s extant.
__________________
Glock 19, 34. Browning HP, S&W 65-3", 1911, M&P .45, Kahr P9, Int'l Assoc. of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors, NRA, Certified Armorer: Glock, SIG, S&W,

Just because it's on the internet doesn't mean it's true: Abraham Lincoln
federali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 17:36   #108
Tiro Fijo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by M 7 View Post
Lighten up, dude.

If you'll take the time to read the linked material you'll see that there is no hyperbole or conjecture...
Perhaps you just "discovered" this revolutionary info you keep quoting, however this has been beat to death a million times here & on other websites. ANCIENT NEWS!!

Marshall never "doctored" his stats. It's just that his stats didn't jive with what the FBI was pushing at the time.
Tiro Fijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 17:38   #109
Glock19Fan
Cool Guy
 
Glock19Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by digilo View Post
Gabrielle Gifford was shot in the head with a 9mm FMJ, and shes recovering.

Also, anyone care to speculate on her chances had she been shot in the head with .45 ACP FMJ, instead of 9mm FMJ??
From what I recall, the same surgeon that operated on her also saved the life of a patient shot in the head with a 7.62x39 AK round.
__________________
Never mistake Kindness for Weakness
Glock19Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 17:49   #110
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,619
All the major military's in the world use plain old fmj. I am sure that fmj's have killed more people in the world than all other ammo combined.
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 18:04   #111
M 7
Senior Member
 
M 7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiro Fijo View Post
Perhaps you just "discovered" this revolutionary info you keep quoting, however this has been beat to death a million times here & on other websites. ANCIENT NEWS!!
OK, so it is "old news".

It is still valid.

For Pete's sake, the analysis uses simple statistical procedures that a high school student could conduct with ease.


As for your opinion-

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiro Fijo View Post
That is pure hyperbole & conjecture based upon opinions...
-what proof have you to support your opinion?

Have you conducted an examination of the statistical analysis (linked above) for errors?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiro Fijo View Post
Marshall never "doctored" his stats. It's just that his stats didn't jive with what the FBI was pushing at the time.
Despite your opinion, the statistical analysis demonstrates otherwise.
__________________
For those who CCW:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by M 7; 10-24-2012 at 20:41..
M 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 18:31   #112
LASTRESORT20
LongTerm-Guy
 
LASTRESORT20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 8,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock19Fan View Post
Am I the only one who thinks the 9mm clearly outperformed the .45?

Nope! Your not the only one....Never been a 45 guy....

There is a G20SF near by for heavy work....so no need for the 45.
LASTRESORT20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 21:59   #113
unit1069
Senior Member
 
unit1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Central US
Posts: 8,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunred View Post
All the major military's in the world use plain old fmj. I am sure that fmj's have killed more people in the world than all other ammo combined.
International treaties determine what ammo is legally acceptable for armed conflict between sovereign states. The issue here is what is the best self-defense ammunition. LEO agencies and all reputable experts apparently agree that reliable JHP ammo is more efficient than FMJ, not that FMJ ammo isn't effective. It's just that JHP is more efficient and effective, all things being equal.
__________________
Rocket Scientist
unit1069 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 18:02   #114
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inebriated View Post
If you don't hit a vital organ or structure, you will not stop a fight. Simple as that. I don't care if it's with a .45 ACP that expanded to 3 FEET, if you miss vitals, you aren't winning. Handguns (9mm, .40, .45) don't do a thing but poke holes, JHP or not, and a .357" hole in the Aorta is just as effective as a .45" hole. I would prefer to use something designed to penetrate, and get to what it needs to put a hole in, than use something designed to STOP MOVING inside the body. So if I didn't have to worry about every round going passing through a bad guy, and potentially wounding someone innocent, I would carry FMJ and be just as content, if not more.
.45 expanding to 3 FEET. Now that is an odd thought. But you're right though. Vital organs or nerves have to be lacerated or punctured. That is why I would aim for the central nerve/spine.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 18:26   #115
Inebriated
Senior Member
 
Inebriated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
.45 expanding to 3 FEET. Now that is an odd thought. But you're right though. Vital organs or nerves have to be lacerated or punctured. That is why I would aim for the central nerve/spine.
3 Feet might be a tad ambitious. lol

But yeah, a hit's a hit, a miss is a miss. Instead of getting wrapped up in bullet type, velocity, ME, weight... worry about hitting.
__________________
Kalashnikov Klub Member #870
Black Rifle Club Member #2L8
The 21 Club Member #19691
Inebriated is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 18:28   #116
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inebriated View Post
3 Feet might be a tad ambitious. lol

But yeah, a hit's a hit, a miss is a miss. Instead of getting wrapped up in bullet type, velocity, ME, weight... worry about hitting.
BUT, it is a funny thought.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 18:33   #117
Inebriated
Senior Member
 
Inebriated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
BUT, it is a funny thought.
Have you seen that Grizzly Extreme stuff? They're trying their damnedest to make it a reality.

Caliber Corner
__________________
Kalashnikov Klub Member #870
Black Rifle Club Member #2L8
The 21 Club Member #19691
Inebriated is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 18:36   #118
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
That

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inebriated View Post
Have you seen that Grizzly Extreme stuff? They're trying their damnedest to make it a reality.

Caliber Corner
is one BIG hollow point!
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 18:37   #119
Inebriated
Senior Member
 
Inebriated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCmasterblaster View Post
is one BIG hollow point!
I'm still trying to figure out what that could possibly be ideal for...
__________________
Kalashnikov Klub Member #870
Black Rifle Club Member #2L8
The 21 Club Member #19691
Inebriated is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 18:58   #120
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,034
An attacking Grizzly bear, maybe?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inebriated View Post
I'm still trying to figure out what that could possibly be ideal for...
Or maybe Osama bin Laden?
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 472
111 Members
361 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31