GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2012, 08:18   #51
B.Reid
Senior Member
 
B.Reid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,285
I hope he gets a big check and those cops get fired. We don't need these types on the government payroles.
__________________
Embrace the apocalypse!

Earth has always been a dangerous place to live. Be prepared!
B.Reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 10:09   #52
Gunnut 45/454
Senior Member
 
Gunnut 45/454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,038
SgtScott31
It good to know there are very informed LEO's like yourself on the beat! Thanks for the insight and be safe out there!
__________________
Gunnut45/454-One shot one kill!
Gunnut 45/454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 10:58   #53
Bruce M
Senior Member
 
Bruce M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S FL
Posts: 20,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.Reid View Post
I hope he gets a big check and those cops get fired. We don't need these types on the government payroles.

Out of curiosity for what would he get a big check?
__________________
Bruce
I never talked to anyone who had to fire their gun who said "I wished I had the smaller gun and fewer rounds with me" Just because you find a hundred people who agree with you on the internet does not mean you're right.
Bruce M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 11:02   #54
B.Reid
Senior Member
 
B.Reid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce M View Post
Out of curiosity for what would he get a big check?
The lawsuit!
__________________
Embrace the apocalypse!

Earth has always been a dangerous place to live. Be prepared!
B.Reid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 11:41   #55
Bruce M
Senior Member
 
Bruce M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S FL
Posts: 20,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.Reid View Post
The lawsuit!

Ok On what grounds would the lawsuit provide him with a big check?
__________________
Bruce
I never talked to anyone who had to fire their gun who said "I wished I had the smaller gun and fewer rounds with me" Just because you find a hundred people who agree with you on the internet does not mean you're right.
Bruce M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 11:43   #56
Dragoon44
Lifetime Membership
Unfair Facist
 
Dragoon44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 24,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce M View Post
Ok On what grounds would the lawsuit provide him with a big check?
I know, I know!!!!

For violating his constipational right not to get his feelings butt hurt!!!

__________________
“Right is still right, even if nobody is doing it. And wrong is still wrong, even if everybody is doing it.”—Texas Ranger saying.
Dragoon44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 17:11   #57
beatcop
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 1,858
See page 1 & 2
beatcop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 18:05   #58
ICARRY2
NRA Life Member
 
ICARRY2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.Reid View Post
I hope he gets a big check and those cops get fired. We don't need these types on the government payroles.
Neither are going to happen. And shouldn't.
ICARRY2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 15:32   #59
LEOson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Middle America
Posts: 330
Did anyone else notice in the video the little text with the definition off arrest? For someone trumpeting on about knowing his rights he sure doesn't know the difference between arrest and detaining .
LEOson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 20:43   #60
FireForged
Millenium #3936
 
FireForged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Rebel South
Posts: 4,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by beatcop View Post
Note the bold...

-The lewrockwell article is trash
-2 minutes in and have heard enough
-guy wants to debate on the roadside while being detained
-cop is stupid for engaging in debate
-guy is playing to the tape recorder


I really don't have any objections to OC, but this guy wanted to generate nonsense and succeeded.

Normal exchange:
You're being stopped for xxxxxx
ok
you have any weapon?
yes, a pistol...here
ok, don't take it out
let me see your ID & stay on the bike holding the bars.
ok.

Looking for an issue:

You're being stopped for xxxxxx
ok
you have any weapon?
I don't consent to searches
Great, I'd prefer not to get shot today, at this point I'm assuming you're armed...and until I determine if you're a crook we're going to do things my way.
What's your name and badge number?
It will be on the bottoom of the ticket.

Guys are wrapped around the axle thinking LE "justifies" certain behavior because of officer safety. YES, certain things are going to change based on the suspects behavior. Does it mean we're throwing out the Constituition? Hell no...but it does mean I'm not going to make it EASY for you to shoot me when you start playing a little games that can easily be seen as things real crooks do (no straight answer to a simple question, ID games, bantering & distracting, passive aggressive games).
Exactly! ........... and what does being a former combat vet have to do with anything?
__________________
"I believe that the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms must not be infringed if liberty in America is to survive." - Ronald Reagan

Last edited by FireForged; 10-02-2012 at 20:46..
FireForged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 08:32   #61
Roger1079
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICARRY2 View Post
The biker was 100% in the wrong.

The leo's pc for stopping him was the call about excessive speed and possibly reckless passing.

Since the biker was OCing, he should have just answered yes to the leos question. If later the leo wanted to search, the biker could have refused. I doubt seriosly though he would have made a request to search.

Leos do have the legal authority to ask any motorist/passenger about guns.

Had the biker just answered yes to the gun question, the leo would have just told him to slow down and be more careful when passing.

Here is my DL, registration, insurance and my MILITARY ID.

Five minute stop max!

Thank you and have fun.

I'm also a little more than disappointed that a USMC Captain does not have any respect for the potential dangers faced by leos everyday.

You would think someone in the military who has been in combat would be the first to understand.
But what was the purpose of asking if the motorist was OPEN CARRYING? That seems as dumb to me as looking at the sky and asking if it is blue. Non consent to a search would not hide the fact he had a firearm.
Roger1079 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 08:39   #62
John Rambo
Raven
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tampa, Fl.
Posts: 8,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by RussP View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/09/24/3019255/combat-vet-sues-over-wyoming-traffic.html
CHEYENNE, Wyo. -- A Wyoming sheriff's deputy who detained a combat veteran in handcuffs for openly carrying a pistol offered to let him go if he agreed to let another deputy draw his weapon and shoot if the veteran made any sudden moves while driving away, court records show.
I read that first paragraph 4 times and still don't exactly get it, but I think someone needs to be kicked in the ass.
John Rambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 21:07   #63
SgtScott31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunnut 45/454 View Post
SgtScott31
It good to know there are very informed LEO's like yourself on the beat! Thanks for the insight and be safe out there!
I try to give informative, unbiased opinions. :D
SgtScott31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 14:03   #64
FourthPointOfContact
Senior Member
 
FourthPointOfContact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunnut 45/454
It's my understanding -correct me if I'm wrong - but unless the officer observes the vehicle speeding they can't charge or write a ticket on the observation of a non LEO ie civilian.
If this is the case, what was the justification for the stop to begin with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA Escapee View Post
I agree. I thought the officer's probable cause was shaky in the first place. The officer really made the stop based on what another (phantom) motorist said, but he didn't observe the alleged violation?
"Sir, I stopped you because there is a report that you passed slower moving vehicles at a high rate of speed according to the driver of the slow moving vehicle."

That's fine, Officer, did you observe me speeding or disobeying any traffic laws?
"No. May I see your license?"

Sure, do you intend to issue a citation for speeding or any other citation based on what you observed?"
"I didn't see you do anything, it's another motorist that called."

Do you intend to issue a citation based on that information?
"I can't, as I said I'm not the one that saw you."

Do you have that motorists name so they can be called to testify against me for the citation that you're not going to write because you didn't observe any violations?"
"I'm not issuing you a danged citation, what part of that didn't you get?"

Oh, I got that part alright.

Last edited by FourthPointOfContact; 10-22-2012 at 14:47..
FourthPointOfContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 15:42   #65
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 15,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by RussP View Post
This link no longer works.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 17:00   #67
Bruce M
Senior Member
 
Bruce M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S FL
Posts: 20,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallschirjäger View Post
"Sir, I stopped you because there is a report that you passed slower moving vehicles at a high rate of speed according to the driver of the slow moving vehicle."

That's fine, Officer, did you observe me speeding or disobeying any traffic laws?
"No. May I see your license?"

Sure, do you intend to issue a citation for speeding or any other citation based on what you observed?"
"I didn't see you do anything, it's another motorist that called."

Do you intend to issue a citation based on that information?
"I can't, as I said I'm not the one that saw you."

Do you have that motorists name so they can be called to testify against me for the citation that you're not going to write because you didn't observe any violations?"
"I'm not issuing you a danged citation, what part of that didn't you get?"

Oh, I got that part alright.

I will offer a slightly different roadside conversation:

"Sir, may I see your license, registration and insurance please"

"Why did you stop me?" / "I did nothing wrong" / "I wasn't speeding/didn't run the light/did stop at the sign/there was no sign. Why do you need my license?"

"Sir, may I see your license,registration and insurance please?"

"But I did / didn't /need to know.."

"Stop. I am not going to ask you again. Give me your driver's license. The law (or state specific statute) requires you to have and display a license. I am not going to ask again. Give me your license or you will be arrested."

Drivers choice at this point.


That said, any news regarding the civil suit?
__________________
Bruce
I never talked to anyone who had to fire their gun who said "I wished I had the smaller gun and fewer rounds with me" Just because you find a hundred people who agree with you on the internet does not mean you're right.

Last edited by Bruce M; 10-22-2012 at 17:01..
Bruce M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 17:14   #68
FourthPointOfContact
Senior Member
 
FourthPointOfContact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 332
Since the officer has initiated a traffic stop, refusing to display/surrender a driving license isn't really an option, at least to me.
On the other hand, I can't see anything wrong with encouraging the officer to write whatever citation he intends to write; and if he doesn't intend to write a citation, why have I been detained?

OT, the civil suit proceeds apace (the insurance company for Plaza Security made a monetary offer of $(redacted but I really wish I had a dollar for every Km between Paris, France and Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan) to have one individual dropped from the suit. One condition was that the details not be shared lest it incur a $100 penalty.

Currently we're waiting for the transcription of Officer's Bell and Dantzler's depositions.
FourthPointOfContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 17:28   #69
Dragoon44
Lifetime Membership
Unfair Facist
 
Dragoon44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 24,118
Is post #64 an actual verbatim account of the beginning of the stop?

or was that a hypothetical, "this is how I would act on a traffic stop if I were a jackass?"
__________________
“Right is still right, even if nobody is doing it. And wrong is still wrong, even if everybody is doing it.”—Texas Ranger saying.

Last edited by Dragoon44; 10-22-2012 at 17:41..
Dragoon44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 18:30   #70
FourthPointOfContact
Senior Member
 
FourthPointOfContact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 332
My apologies Dragoon, I didn't think that anyone would have difficulties. Yes, it's hypothetical of how an officer might act if he was a jackhole.

If a cop's fishing for information to develop probable cause, I don't have any problem baiting a hook and throwing in a line just like he's doing. It's interesting the things they can inadvertently admit when they get all flustered. Ask the right questions and you can get them to admit that
A) they lack any reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal conduct to initiate a detainment
B) that they know certain conduct is legal and
C) sometimes, you might even get them to admit under oath that they signed their name to a sworn document, knowing at the time of signing that the statement was false..... or so I've heard.

Last edited by FourthPointOfContact; 10-22-2012 at 19:19..
FourthPointOfContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 19:00   #71
Dragoon44
Lifetime Membership
Unfair Facist
 
Dragoon44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 24,118
Quote:
If a cop's fishing for information to develop probable cause, I don't have any problem baiting a hook and throwing in a line just like he's doing.
So telling someone why they stopped them is fishing for probable cause?



Quote:
A) they don't have probable cause to make a stop
And that is relevant how exactly?

Here is something your lawyer should have already told you. Traffic stops do not require probable cause. Probable cause is needed only for an arrest. NOT for a traffic stop\ investigative detention.
__________________
“Right is still right, even if nobody is doing it. And wrong is still wrong, even if everybody is doing it.”—Texas Ranger saying.
Dragoon44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 19:18   #72
FourthPointOfContact
Senior Member
 
FourthPointOfContact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 332
Thanks, Dragoon, I should have said "Reasonable Suspicion" it's since been corrected. Oh, and since I read and understand English I don't need a lawyer to help me understand the law. I can see where that might be the case for some.

Last edited by FourthPointOfContact; 10-22-2012 at 19:23..
FourthPointOfContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 19:55   #73
Dragoon44
Lifetime Membership
Unfair Facist
 
Dragoon44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 24,118
Quote:
and since I read and understand English I don't need a lawyer to help me understand the law. I can see where that might be the case for some.
And to think of all those years of law school that lawyers go thru when all they really need to do is read and understand English!



So you are saying you do not have a lawyer?
__________________
“Right is still right, even if nobody is doing it. And wrong is still wrong, even if everybody is doing it.”—Texas Ranger saying.
Dragoon44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 20:02   #74
FourthPointOfContact
Senior Member
 
FourthPointOfContact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoon44 View Post
And to think of all those years of law school that lawyers go thru when all they really need to do is read and understand English!

So you are saying you do not have a lawyer?
Lawyers go to law school not to understand the law but to think like a lawyer. Understanding that "(b)(1) No county or municipal corporation, by zoning or by ordinance, resolution, or other enactment, shall regulate in any manner gun shows; the possession, ownership, transport, carrying, transfer, sale, purchase, licensing, or registration of firearms or components of firearms; firearms dealers; or dealers in firearms components" is hardly rocket science even though there are a lot of multisyllabic in there.


I have one for the civil suit involving Officer's Adam Bell and Rodney Dantzler, yes. I'm pretty sure they (or their department) has retained counsel for them as well. But that's distracting from this thread and better addressed in Man files suit over arrest in Gwinnett park, Part Deux

I'm sure it's no one you may have heard of though, just a hick lawyer in a hick town.

Last edited by FourthPointOfContact; 10-22-2012 at 20:13..
FourthPointOfContact is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 21:27   #75
Dragoon44
Lifetime Membership
Unfair Facist
 
Dragoon44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 24,118
Quote:
Lawyers go to law school not to understand the law but to think like a lawyer
That is very true, and the first thing they learn is to stop thinking that just because they can read English they understand the law.
__________________
“Right is still right, even if nobody is doing it. And wrong is still wrong, even if everybody is doing it.”—Texas Ranger saying.
Dragoon44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 22:36.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,202
327 Members
875 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42