Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-30-2010, 21:26   #1
my762buzz
Senior Member
 
my762buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,673
New wingmaster: Can anyone spot whats wrong with this picture?

High Power Club
my762buzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 22:24   #2
aippi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,648
You are showing an Express matte finish magazine tube with the Express retainer. Since the pictures are pasted and not one complete picuture, I don't get the point. Are you saying your wingmaster came with an Express magazine tube. If so, did this come from the Factory this way and when?
__________________
J.D. McGuire, Owner
AI&P Tactical, LLC

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Remington LE Armorer
Mossberg LE Armorer

Last edited by aippi; 07-30-2010 at 22:31..
aippi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 23:13   #3
my762buzz
Senior Member
 
my762buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by aippi View Post
You are showing an Express matte finish magazine tube with the Express retainer. Since the pictures are pasted and not one complete picuture, I don't get the point. Are you saying your wingmaster came with an Express magazine tube. If so, did this come from the Factory this way and when?
Have another look.

I bought it new in the box today from a major sporting chain store. Is the forearm tube not suppose to look like that?
I always read and heard that wingmasters do not have mag tube dimples. When I got home and opened the box, I was quite shocked.
The crack in the wood was surprise enough, but the dimples really made me wonder what's going on here.

High Power Club

Last edited by my762buzz; 07-30-2010 at 23:18..
my762buzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 23:24   #4
my762buzz
Senior Member
 
my762buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,673
The real heart breaker. A molded extractor.

High Power Club
my762buzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 01:31   #5
my762buzz
Senior Member
 
my762buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,673
Ahhhh I see the crack is normal for new stocks. See picture on the link.

Paraphrased "870 Wingmaster furniture set It came off of a new gun"

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=181167987

and another

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=181471152

Last edited by my762buzz; 07-31-2010 at 01:35..
my762buzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 03:02   #6
aippi
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,648
Yes that is a MIM extractor that comes on the Express, your first pictures did not show that close enough. If you mean the split in the center of the inside of the forend, that is the way it is made so that is normal.

Call Remington Monday and find out what the heck is going on
__________________
J.D. McGuire, Owner
AI&P Tactical, LLC

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Remington LE Armorer
Mossberg LE Armorer
aippi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2010, 22:17   #7
Z71bill
Senior Member
 
Z71bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by my762buzz View Post
The real heart breaker. A molded extractor.

High Power Club
I have shot hundreds and hundreds of rounds through my 870 with the factory MIM extractor. Never any problem.

I figured - I might as well have a spare extractor in my parts inventory so I ordered a NON MIM one.

I compared the two side by side - expecting to see wear on the MIM part - but is exactly the same size - and shows no wear - not even on the tip that contacts the shell.

I went ahead and installed it - but would not have a problem using the MIM part.

I ordered it from Midway - since I have a C&R on file with them it was only $11 - other wise $14.79.

http://www.midwayusa.com/Search/#138..._1-2-4_8-16-32

Last edited by Z71bill; 08-02-2010 at 07:05..
Z71bill is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2010, 22:24   #8
GlocksterPaulie
Perfectionist
 
GlocksterPaulie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Damned if I know
Posts: 4,512
I would rather buy an old 870 at a GS than buy a new one today. Better steel & wood back then. The grip on the stock is much better on the older models also, the new one feels like a brick.

I have a couple from the mid 70's that are still going strong.

Paulie
GlocksterPaulie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 09:45   #9
Z71bill
Senior Member
 
Z71bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlocksterPaulie View Post
I would rather buy an old 870 at a GS than buy a new one today. Better steel & wood back then. The grip on the stock is much better on the older models also, the new one feels like a brick.

I have a couple from the mid 70's that are still going strong.

Paulie

I know of a ~~1990 Wingmaster that is for sale - $250

The seller says he shot 1 box of shells through it - and it is in like new condition.

It is listed as 2 3/4 inch field grade - modified choke - I am assuming a fixed choke.

I was considering buying it - have not actually seen it

I was wondering if the 28 inch spare barrel I have would fit the 1990 Wingmaster. I think yes.

My barrel is a 2 3/4 or 3 inch with Rem choke.

If I swap the barrel does that automatically allow the gun to shoot 3 inch shells?

Last edited by Z71bill; 08-02-2010 at 13:14..
Z71bill is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 14:31   #10
my762buzz
Senior Member
 
my762buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z71bill View Post
My barrel is a 2 3/4 or 3 inch with Rem choke.

If I swap the barrel does that automatically allow the gun to shoot 3 inch shells?
I tried a 870 express barrel on the my new wingmaster and it fit just fine.

I'm not really sure about using 3 inch shells with a receiver that came with a 2 3/4 only barrel. There is a warning, however, with barrels able to shoot 3 1/2 shells to not shoot 3 1/2 while they are on a non-super magnum receiver.
my762buzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 07:37   #11
glock2619
Work in Progres
 
glock2619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 1,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z71bill View Post
I know of a ~~1990 Wingmaster that is for sale - $250

The seller says he shot 1 box of shells through it - and it is in like new condition.

It is listed as 2 3/4 inch field grade - modified choke - I am assuming a fixed choke.

I was considering buying it - have not actually seen it

I was wondering if the 28 inch spare barrel I have would fit the 1990 Wingmaster. I think yes.

My barrel is a 2 3/4 or 3 inch with Rem choke.

If I swap the barrel does that automatically allow the gun to shoot 3 inch shells?

No. The ejectors are different from a MAGNUM marked receiver to a receiver that is not marked MAGNUM. However, your remchoke barrel will work just fine for 2.75" shells. If you were looking to get rid of your remchoke barrel.......

Edit: Tough to go wrong with an old Wingmaster. Even more tough to go wrong with an old Wingmaster in almost like-new condition for $250.

Last edited by glock2619; 08-04-2010 at 07:38..
glock2619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 17:09   #12
my762buzz
Senior Member
 
my762buzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by glock2619 View Post
No. The ejectors are different from a MAGNUM marked receiver to a receiver that is not marked MAGNUM. However, your remchoke barrel will work just fine for 2.75" shells. If you were looking to get rid of your remchoke barrel.......

Edit: Tough to go wrong with an old Wingmaster. Even more tough to go wrong with an old Wingmaster in almost like-new condition for $250.
Mine came from Remington with a 3 inch chamber and no magnum on the receiver. I just cycled a few 3 inch shells and they ejected fine. I can't see a reason why it won't shoot 3 inch shells. I guess Remington may have two types of wingmaster receivers.

Last edited by my762buzz; 08-04-2010 at 17:13..
my762buzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 08:11   #13
glock2619
Work in Progres
 
glock2619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 1,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by my762buzz View Post
Mine came from Remington with a 3 inch chamber and no magnum on the receiver. I just cycled a few 3 inch shells and they ejected fine. I can't see a reason why it won't shoot 3 inch shells. I guess Remington may have two types of wingmaster receivers.
Hmmm. I'm guessing for several years now, they have been making nothing but 3" compatible receivers (other than the super mags), negating the need to mark them magnum. But if you look at the older ones, they were specifically marked MAGNUM to be compatible with 3" chamber barrels.

I guess what I was trying to say is that if it was an older 870 with a 2.75" marked barrel and the receiver isn't marked MAGNUM, just adding a 3" chambered barrel will not make it a 3" ready gun. The ejectors WERE different between those two types of receivers-but as far as I know that was the only difference. In your case, it's a new production gun with a 3" marked chamber-it would definitely be a 3" gun.

Last edited by glock2619; 08-05-2010 at 08:12..
glock2619 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 10:47   #14
Hauptmann6
Senior Member
 
Hauptmann6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 9,418
Send a message via AIM to Hauptmann6 Send a message via MSN to Hauptmann6 Send a message via Yahoo to Hauptmann6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z71bill View Post
I was considering buying it - have not actually seen it

I was wondering if the 28 inch spare barrel I have would fit the 1990 Wingmaster. I think yes.

My barrel is a 2 3/4 or 3 inch with Rem choke.

If I swap the barrel does that automatically allow the gun to shoot 3 inch shells?
DO IT!!!

Yes, it should interchange.

And I think so but why bother?
__________________
--Power corrupts. Absolute power is pretty groovy baby!--
Do you believe in forever?
I don't even believe in tomorrow
The only things that last forever
Are memories and sorrow

Last edited by Hauptmann6; 10-19-2012 at 10:47..
Hauptmann6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 00:53   #15
DJ Niner
Moderator
 
DJ Niner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North-Central USA
Posts: 17,789
If a 3" chambered barrel were installed, the older 2.75" receivers would usually feed and fire a 3" shell, but between the farther-forward-mounted ejector and the shorter ejection port, the fired 3" empty shell (which was about 3.5" long with the unfolded crimp sticking out the front) usually would not eject.
DJ Niner is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:26.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 972
301 Members
671 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31