GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2012, 16:14   #1
arnettjd10
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 70
Interesting test results and question about ammo?

I have been debating on getting a pistol in 357 Sig, i really like the 9mm and this round is like a 9mm on steroids. But i sit down and watched Tnoutdoors9 tests and wrote down all the results. After going back and looking at them i found that 357 Sig 125 gr had a velocity of about 1,336 fps with about 14.50in of penatration. The Underwood 9mm +P+ 124 gr shot at 1,298 fps with about 13.25in of penatration. So now im thinking that with the high cost of 357 Sig ammo and barely better performance over the 9mm that i would be crazy to buy a handgun in 357 Sig, not to mention the reduced round magazine capacity. But i know to achieve the results of the 9mm test i am pretty much limited to Underwood ammo. (all of the tests on this ammo that i have seen has been great!) So my questions are: I want everybodys opinion on Underwood ammo and why would people buy a gun in 357 Sig when u can get pretty much the same results with cheaper ammo and more magazine capacity with the 9mm?
arnettjd10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 16:24   #2
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,848
Blog Entries: 3
I would never want to rely on a boutique ammo manuf for my carry rounds, That is just me, but if it doesn't come from one of the majors, I am likely not going there. So yes, there are a few +P or +P + loads that are close to 357sig, but they are not cheap compared to 357sig, often cost more. Round count, depends. In Kommifornia, I get 10+1, regardless fo caliber, so round count is pretty moot. I would go 357sig over 9mm in the same platforms. I like the 357sig, shoot it as well as 9mm+P+ so I'll take the extra 75-100fps. In smaller compact or subcompact, I choose the 9mm in a +P laoding. Cost of ammo doesn;t matter to me as I relaod all my practice stuff & 357sig loads for the same cost as 9mm+P.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 10-12-2012 at 16:26..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 16:44   #3
robhic
Platinum Membership
WOLVERINE!!!!
 
robhic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,993
As Fred says above, unless the ammo has "street cred" it's probably better to not use it for CCW.

That said, I have had good results from Underwood ammo and many others have, too. But it hasn't "paid its dues" in LEO guns, etc. The final decision is up to you.
__________________
-- Robert --
NRA Life Member

"Giving Money and Power to Government is Like Giving Whiskey and Car Keys to Teenage Boys" - PJ O'Rourke
robhic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 17:35   #4
unit1069
Senior Member
 
unit1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Central US
Posts: 8,752
I've settled on two self-defense calibers, the 9mm and .357sig. If I had to choose only one it would be the .357sig because of its greater overall range and application. Like fred mentioned it's a disadvantage to rely on a single boutique ammo company's supply for your ammo needs.

There is a greater supply of effective 9mm self-defense ammo but where the 9mm is pushing the envelope for that caliber the standard, run-of-the-mill .357sig self-defense rounds aren't even breathing hard.

I carry my 9mm pistols more frequently than my .357sig because of their easier CCW conceal ability, not for their semi-equivalent effectiveness. If you do end up with a .357sig pistol I do think you'll appreciate the fine distinction between the two calibers while acknowledging the worth of both.
__________________
Rocket Scientist
unit1069 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 18:31   #5
PrecisionRifleman
Senior Member
 
PrecisionRifleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,348
With a 125gr bullet in the 357Sig case you should be able to get 1400fps from a full size Glock. That's a respectable difference between a 124gr in a 9mm casing moving at 1200-1250fps. I'm going to have to pick up a G32 barrel for my G23.
__________________
PrecisionRifleman

G20SF
Gen4 G23

Last edited by PrecisionRifleman; 10-12-2012 at 18:32..
PrecisionRifleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 20:31   #6
cowboy1964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 15,216
.357 Sig is still faster.

Also, are you going to be able to replicate the shooting characteristics of this ammo with your practice ammo? And is this stuff going to be hard on the gun?

Last edited by cowboy1964; 10-12-2012 at 20:37..
cowboy1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 20:34   #7
uz2bUSMC
10mm defender
 
uz2bUSMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: J-Ville NC
Posts: 3,620
If you go with the Glock platform, why not get the .357 sig and by a 9mm conversion setup in 9mm. Shoot more often in 9mm and save some change, shoot more sparingly in .357 sig to maintain proficiency. Practice with 9 carry .357.

The .357 is far from being out of breath as far as popularity is concerned, more choices may be on the horizon. That being said, Underwood may grow, giving more confidence as a supplier. He may never be as big as the big three (or care to be) but being a mainstay such as Corbon or BB is a strong possibility.

Getting the Glock platform in .357 is your "cake and eating it too" scenario once you have the conversion in 9mm.
__________________
- Without idiots, there would be no baseline for common sense.

- "Our country went through a transition during the last election where the parasites came together and outnumbered the hosts." -jdavionic
uz2bUSMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 20:53   #8
avenues165
Senior Member
 
avenues165's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 428
Underwood 9mm +p+ 124gr = 1,298fps
New Underwood 357 sig 125gr = 1,475fps (as stated by Underwood on GT, not tested yet by TNOutdoors9)

The rounds tested by TNOutdoors9 for 357 sig are all loads from the bigger guys that don't make hotter 357sig loads(Federal, Remington, Speer, hornady).

Let's compare apples to apples.

Having said all of that, the 9mm is a fine cartridge and would serve you well.
avenues165 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 00:09   #9
SDDL-UP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,043
I'm just not a fan of the 357 Sig. Just not.

For decades people wanted SOMETHING between 9mm and 45 ACP - give them the 10mm Auto and 40 S&W, but they're not happy. So what's the next GREAT thing? Neck down the 40 S&W so we can have the reduced magazine capacity of the 40 S&W with the smaller bullet of the 9mm - OUTSTANDING! Really? Aren't we kind of re-inventing the wheel? 38 Super Comp seems like a better solution - just because of magazine capacity.

It just seems a bit odd.

Now that said... the 357 Sig is a fine round. Nothing WRONG with it. The thing that makes me "not a fan" is there is a lot of hype about it - "flat shooting", "unbelievable manstopper", etc.

With proper bullet selection there isn't a nickel's worth of difference between 9mm, 357 SIG, 40 S&W, and 45 ACP. Shot placement with any of them will get the job done. Each caliber has advantages and DISADVANTAGES. Choose any caliber you want, but understand your decision has compromises.
__________________
"Arm yourself, arm a friend!"
SDDL-UP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 02:02   #10
9mm +p+
Senior Member
 
9mm +p+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: KS
Posts: 2,429
Boutique ammo? How about Federal they started out small or corbon or any of the other smaller mfg's with a good rep? I run Underwoods 124 +p+ load and have fired quite a bit in my 19 and 26 and it has been flawless and quite accurate to boot, Is it s a 357 sig? Nope but the 357 sig is not a 357 mag either. A warm 9 midweight will handle just about anything that I'm likely to get into it with.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum
9mm +p+ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 09:37   #11
cowboy1964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 15,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9mm +p+ View Post
Is it s a 357 sig? Nope but the 357 sig is not a 357 mag either
Actually it's about exactly equal to a 125gr .357 Magnum from a 3" revolver.

Last edited by cowboy1964; 10-13-2012 at 09:38..
cowboy1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 12:30   #12
avenues165
Senior Member
 
avenues165's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9mm +p+ View Post
Boutique ammo? How about Federal they started out small or corbon or any of the other smaller mfg's with a good rep? I run Underwoods 124 +p+ load and have fired quite a bit in my 19 and 26 and it has been flawless and quite accurate to boot, Is it s a 357 sig? Nope but the 357 sig is not a 357 mag either. A warm 9 midweight will handle just about anything that I'm likely to get into it with.
A good 9mm load will be a great SD round, no question about it. If I was using a 9mm I would probably use a 124gr +p or +p+.

I like the 357, but there is nothing wrong with the 9mm. In fact, the 9mm has some advantages: additional rounds in the mag, cheaper range shooting, less recoil, less wear on pistols, etc.

I prefer the 357, but I would never get down on the selection of a 9mm. But I do feel to call them the same isn't accurate, as stated in the post I quoted. Different options are wonderful, long live the 9mm, .40S&W, 357sig, .45 gap, .45acp, 10mm, etc!!!!

How's that for diplomacy and peace makin'?
avenues165 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 13:47   #13
unit1069
Senior Member
 
unit1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Central US
Posts: 8,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by avenues165 View Post
A good 9mm load will be a great SD round, no question about it. If I was using a 9mm I would probably use a 124gr +p or +p+.

I like the 357, but there is nothing wrong with the 9mm. In fact, the 9mm has some advantages: additional rounds in the mag, cheaper range shooting, less recoil, less wear on pistols, etc.

I prefer the 357, but I would never get down on the selection of a 9mm. But I do feel to call them the same isn't accurate, as stated in the post I quoted. Different options are wonderful, long live the 9mm, .40S&W, 357sig, .45 gap, .45acp, 10mm, etc!!!!

How's that for diplomacy and peace makin'?
It seems to me that shooting +P/+P+ ammo in a 9mm pistol would result in more wear compared to shooting .357sig ammo in a .357sig pistol. Now if shooting a velocity-hyped .357sig round like Underwood is reputed to be then it would be a wash, in my opinion.
__________________
Rocket Scientist
unit1069 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 14:14   #14
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnettjd10 View Post
I have been debating on getting a pistol in 357 Sig, i really like the 9mm and this round is like a 9mm on steroids. But i sit down and watched Tnoutdoors9 tests and wrote down all the results. After going back and looking at them i found that 357 Sig 125 gr had a velocity of about 1,336 fps with about 14.50in of penatration. The Underwood 9mm +P+ 124 gr shot at 1,298 fps with about 13.25in of penatration. So now im thinking that with the high cost of 357 Sig ammo and barely better performance over the 9mm that i would be crazy to buy a handgun in 357 Sig, not to mention the reduced round magazine capacity. But i know to achieve the results of the 9mm test i am pretty much limited to Underwood ammo. (all of the tests on this ammo that i have seen has been great!) So my questions are: I want everybodys opinion on Underwood ammo and why would people buy a gun in 357 Sig when u can get pretty much the same results with cheaper ammo and more magazine capacity with the 9mm?
Good thinking, bro. I carry a G17 with 115gr WW JHP +p+. I have chronoed this load at 1400 FPS. 17 rounds in my G17 will handle almost anything.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 22:01   #15
avenues165
Senior Member
 
avenues165's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by unit1069 View Post
It seems to me that shooting +P/+P+ ammo in a 9mm pistol would result in more wear compared to shooting .357sig ammo in a .357sig pistol. Now if shooting a velocity-hyped .357sig round like Underwood is reputed to be then it would be a wash, in my opinion.
I was specifically thinking about range time with standard pressure rounds, but it is a good point. Although, I still wonder if the +p and +p+ stuff causes as much wear as a 357 sig. I am afraid it is beyond my limited knowledge base.

After spending some time shooting GDs out of the G23 and G24 at "reactive" targets (water bottles, wet cardboard, clay mud, fruits, etc), I think that they are plenty for SD*. They are also street-proven. I am eagerly looking forward to TNOutdoors9 upcoming test of the new Underwood 357 sig GD load.

*I know this isn't flesh. However, I don't have any people to practice on and I won't hunt anymore. If I did I wouldn't use a 357 sig. Hunt all you want, it is just no longer my thing.
avenues165 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 12:18   #16
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by avenues165 View Post
I was specifically thinking about range time with standard pressure rounds, but it is a good point. Although, I still wonder if the +p and +p+ stuff causes as much wear as a 357 sig. I am afraid it is beyond my limited knowledge base.

After spending some time shooting GDs out of the G23 and G24 at "reactive" targets (water bottles, wet cardboard, clay mud, fruits, etc), I think that they are plenty for SD*. They are also street-proven. I am eagerly looking forward to TNOutdoors9 upcoming test of the new Underwood 357 sig GD load.

*I know this isn't flesh. However, I don't have any people to practice on and I won't hunt anymore. If I did I wouldn't use a 357 sig. Hunt all you want, it is just no longer my thing.
Glock endorses 9mm +p and +p+ ammunition.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 13:53   #17
1canvas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ne ohio
Posts: 2,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDDL-UP View Post
I'm just not a fan of the 357 Sig.
With proper bullet selection there isn't a nickel's worth of difference between 9mm, 357 SIG, 40 S&W, and 45 ACP. Shot placement with any of them will get the job done. Each caliber has advantages and DISADVANTAGES. Choose any caliber you want, but understand your decision has compromises.
if that was true everyone would shoot 9mm, why shoot anything else.
in the real world good shot placement, although hoped for, very seldom happens when the shooter and the shot are in motion.
I have seen what those calibers do on animals and the results are quite different, especially the sig.
1canvas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 14:44   #18
SCmasterblaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Hartford, Vermont
Posts: 16,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1canvas View Post
if that was true everyone would shoot 9mm, why shoot anything else.
in the real world good shot placement, although hoped for, very seldom happens when the shooter and the shot are in motion.
I have seen what those calibers do on animals and the results are quite different, especially the sig.
9mm ammo is the least expensive of all of them, but ammo price is not even in my top five of reasons to choose a caliber. I have chosen 9mm because I have a G17. If I had a G22 I would use .40 S&W.
__________________
Gun Ownership Offers Freedom in Many Dimensions
SCmasterblaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 16:03   #19
avenues165
Senior Member
 
avenues165's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 428
I think the 9mm is a fine choice for SD, as is the 357sig, .40s&w, 10mm, 45gap, 45acp, 357 mag, etc. But, none of them are the same. They are all different for different applications, preferences, etc.

It would be boring if they were all the same. I like options!
avenues165 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 16:32   #20
unit1069
Senior Member
 
unit1069's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: So. Central US
Posts: 8,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by avenues165 View Post
I was specifically thinking about range time with standard pressure rounds, but it is a good point. Although, I still wonder if the +p and +p+ stuff causes as much wear as a 357 sig. I am afraid it is beyond my limited knowledge base.
I think it all depends on the build of the pistol. I have one 9mm pistol that can shoot +P and +P+ ammo without any concern and another that the maker warns against shooting anything but standard pressure ammo. I am confident that my 3rd generation G-32 can shoot the normal (1325-1375 fps) .357sig rounds without any worries and I wouldn't think twice about shooting hotter ammo through this pistol if I had a mind to. But anytime ammo is loaded "hot" it results in more pressures on the gun, whatever the caliber.

Quote:
After spending some time shooting GDs out of the G23 and G24 at "reactive" targets (water bottles, wet cardboard, clay mud, fruits, etc), I think that they are plenty for SD*.
I'm sure the Gold Dots in those platforms are more than adequate for self-defense.
__________________
Rocket Scientist
unit1069 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,001
266 Members
735 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31