GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2012, 21:06   #1
Eaz8
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 55
Glock 22 vs 23 - is the cost worth it?

im looking at getting a gen 4 in .40 (or getting a beretta but lets narrow this down to the glock option first...ill still end up with a beretta in a few months anyway...)

so heres where im stuck..
i have a oppurtunity to get a glock 23 gen 4 new with a LW 107mm barrel (canadian min length) for $825+tax and +30 shipping..these usually go for $1000 plus shipping and tax here
where the glock 22 is $700 locally and there is glock day coming up on oct 28th so they usually go on sale for $650-675.
so there is a big price jump for the 22 vs 23...is it worth it??

what do you guys think?

i currently have a 17 gen 4, really like it. as of today ive got 1100 rounds through her without any issues. brass doesnt throw in the same spot but it all comes out and throws so that isnt a issue to me.
my sig p226 will put 9/10 casings into the same spot, today i put a box that was 4"x8" opening next to me and almost all the casings landed in it...much easier than picking up the empties lol
Eaz8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 07:36   #2
byf43
NRA Life Member
 
byf43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 13,543
Had to see what 107mm is (4.25").

Only you can make the decision of what the G23 is worth.
Here, I can get the G23 for $398.20 + 6% sales tax (USD).

The G23 is very easily concealed, for me in a Bianchi "Remedy" leather holster, or the Don Hume "JIT Slide".

My daughter's b/f is a police officer, and he is required to carry his issued G22 on/off duty.
He's physically fit and does conceal that G22 rather well, in a DeSantis leather holster - at the 4:00 position.
__________________
G21 Gen2; G19 Gen3; G30SF; G23 Gen3; G26 Gen4. GLOCK Certified Armorer

"Live Free. Practice democracy. Make a difference. Love your family and your country." H.N.K. (My Dad) 09/02/1924 - 05/11/2012
byf43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 10:25   #3
GAFinch
Senior Member
 
GAFinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,801
If you're going to carry it, get the 23. If not, then the 22.
GAFinch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 12:31   #4
Eaz8
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 55
Well I'm in canada, so only police can carry (which I am not)
So concielment or carry size is not a issue.
Isn't the 23 only a slightly shorter barrel and shorter grip?

Ill probably wait till glock day in 2 weeks to decide, I would love to try out a 23 and if I like the grip better it would probably be worth it (kinda)

Other option is the beretta 92 or 96. I want to get a .40 but if I get the beretta I want the inox which I believe only comes as the 92 in 9mm (I have 2 - 9mm pistols already and nothing in .40)
What do you guys think about the beretta? They start at 750 in black and $835 for the inox finish.
Eaz8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 13:42   #5
vafish
Senior Member
 
vafish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 24,213
Since you are in Canada and can't carry there is zero advantage to the g23, except if you have small hands the finger grooves may line up better for you.

Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
"If your plan is for one year, plant rice.
If your plan is for ten years, plant trees.
If your plan is for one hundred years,
educate children." -- Confucius
vafish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 14:58   #6
GAFinch
Senior Member
 
GAFinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,801
.40 has a slight advantage over 9mm for carrying based on a (theoretical) need to penetrate auto doors and glass. If that's not a factor, I don't see any reason to shoot that over 9mm as it has snappier recoil and doesn't offer any significant advantage in stopping power compared to modern 9mm loads, unless you need a "power" caliber for shooting competitions.

The Inox Beretta is a sexy gun.
GAFinch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 15:37   #7
12131
CLM Number 101
Monkeyboy
 
12131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: God's Country (Texas)
Posts: 11,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAFinch View Post
.40 has a slight advantage over 9mm for carrying based on a (theoretical) need to penetrate auto doors and glass. If that's not a factor, I don't see any reason to shoot that over 9mm as it has snappier recoil and doesn't offer any significant advantage in stopping power compared to modern 9mm loads, unless you need a "power" caliber for shooting competitions.

The Inox Beretta is a sexy gun.
The man already has the G17 and P226 (assuming in 9mm).
He's asking G22 v G23.
__________________
NRA Lifer, GOA Lifer, SAF Lifer
Commie libs, criminals, and sheeple love gun control. It's easier to blame inanimate objects than the killers themselves.
Andrew Cuomo & Michael Bloomberg = Friends of criminals

Politicians and judges who voted for, and supported, Obamacare are traitors to the country!
Con, the first 3 letters in Congress.
UN, the first 2 letters in UNnecessary.
12131 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 15:49   #8
Eaz8
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12131 View Post
The man already has the G17 and P226 (assuming in 9mm).
He's asking G22 v G23.
correct, im looking for a .40

i have:
Glock 17 gen 4 9mm
Sig P226 W.German 9mm
Sig P220 Frame made in Germany .45acp

im trying to get a few pistols in different calibers. im going to be looking at revolvers next summer. i dont know how much shooting ill do over the winter (my range is a bit of a drive to get to) the the saved $ on ammo can fund another couple guns.

ive heard that some shooting competitions you need to use .40, i havent got into any of them yet, but hopefully next year once ive got another few thousand practice rounds down the pipe.
im still a new shooter...less than a year licensed, but have been shootings friends stuff at ranges for a few years.


EDIT - just checked beretta's website and the Inox is only in 9mm... so for beretta i either go with a 9mm Inox or get the .40sw in black.

Last edited by Eaz8; 10-09-2012 at 16:00..
Eaz8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 16:53   #9
GAFinch
Senior Member
 
GAFinch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12131 View Post
The man already has the G17 and P226 (assuming in 9mm).
He's asking G22 v G23.
No, he's asking G22 v G23 and G22 v G23 v Beretta. I gave my opinion on both scenarios.
GAFinch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 20:11   #10
davsco
Senior Member
 
davsco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 475
from what i've seen, the prices, at least in and around Virginia, are roughly the same for the various 9, 40 and 357sig glocs of the three sizes. looks like the g23 you're looking at may have an aftermarket barrel resulting in a higher price?

if you're not going to carry, i'd get a larger gun, so if you want .40, either the g22 or even the g35. i believe the grip circumferences are identical between all their .40 offerings, and at least for me, the grip on the g23 is long enough so that both my hands are fully engaged. but the longer sight radius of the g22 or 35 along with a little extra weight should make them a little easier to shoot for you.
davsco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 20:30   #11
Rooster Rugburn
Got Pignose?
 
Rooster Rugburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: hopefully, on your ignore list
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eaz8 View Post
correct, im looking for a .40

i have:
Glock 17 gen 4 9mm
Sig P226 W.German 9mm
Sig P220 Frame made in Germany .45acp

im trying to get a few pistols in different calibers. im going to be looking at revolvers next summer. i dont know how much shooting ill do over the winter (my range is a bit of a drive to get to) the the saved $ on ammo can fund another couple guns.

ive heard that some shooting competitions you need to use .40, i havent got into any of them yet, but hopefully next year once ive got another few thousand practice rounds down the pipe.
im still a new shooter...less than a year licensed, but have been shootings friends stuff at ranges for a few years.


EDIT - just checked beretta's website and the Inox is only in 9mm... so for beretta i either go with a 9mm Inox or get the .40sw in black.
Easy solution: Get the G23 and an X-Grip or one of the others. It's two guns in one. The G23 can use G22 mags, and with a grip extension, it's basically the same. With that setup, EVERY argument that can be made for the full size G22 can be made for the G23 with the grip extension. You have the G22 size and capacity, and the G23 reduced size.

You can make the G23 into a G22, but you cannot make a G22 into a G23.
__________________
Sent from American Standard low flow using Crappatalk.

I'm not the kind of poster who goes 20 pages trying to prove a point. I'll make my point with 1 or 2 replies and be done. I don't need your approval.
Rooster Rugburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 20:39   #12
Eaz8
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn View Post
Easy solution: Get the G23 and an X-Grip or one of the others. It's two guns in one. The G23 can use G22 mags, and with a grip extension, it's basically the same. With that setup, EVERY argument that can be made for the full size G22 can be made for the G23 with the grip extension. You have the G22 size and capacity, and the G23 reduced size.

You can make the G23 into a G22, but you cannot make a G22 into a G23.
i dont really have big hands. i wear a medium glove.
the 17 fits.

ive decided to go to glock demo day before i buy anything, hopefylly they have the 19 and 23 out for demos and a few of the other models with the canadian barrels. (i hate our barrel length laws.... we have to be 105 or 106mm or longer to be non restricted...otherwise its prohibited, and no one can get those licenses anymore...)
the canadian barrel also drives the prices, up. they have to have the canadian barrel on before crossing the border....which means you guys can get cheaper glock barrels in the states..because we already aid for them lol
Eaz8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 20:47   #13
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 92,653
This is a thread for General Glocking.
__________________
.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 20:48   #14
jbglock
Senior Member
 
jbglock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 467
Since you can't carry it I'd recommend the 22. Seems like an easy choice given that one thing.
jbglock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 20:49   #15
jbglock
Senior Member
 
jbglock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn View Post
Easy solution: Get the G23 and an X-Grip or one of the others. It's two guns in one. The G23 can use G22 mags, and with a grip extension, it's basically the same. With that setup, EVERY argument that can be made for the full size G22 can be made for the G23 with the grip extension. You have the G22 size and capacity, and the G23 reduced size.

You can make the G23 into a G22, but you cannot make a G22 into a G23.
23C is still my favorite Glock. Truth is their is a difference though. The 22 will have a longer sight radius. It's not huge but it is a difference. A 23 with a grip extension is not really a 22 other than the mag.
jbglock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 20:56   #16
Eaz8
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023 View Post
This is a thread for General Glocking.
i actually meant to put it in there..but clicked this section.
ph well
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbglock View Post
23C is still my favorite Glock. Truth is their is a difference though. The 22 will have a longer sight radius. It's not huge but it is a difference. A 23 with a grip extension is not really a 22 other than the mag.
i dont think i need a grip extension.also...10 round max in our mags... the grip looking at gen 3 19 and 22 look like its a different thickness and yes the 23 is shorter.
the barrels that are going on are lone wolf silver stainless. i couldnt get them to put on threaded...i figured it sticks out why cant it be threaded...so if i get it ill take it somewhere and have that done.
but the 23 is basically going to cost me what..$300 more than the 22.llseems tough to stomach that 300 for it

Last edited by Eaz8; 10-09-2012 at 21:13..
Eaz8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2012, 21:16   #17
jbglock
Senior Member
 
jbglock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eaz8 View Post
i actually meant to put it in there..but clicked this section.
ph well

i dont think i need a grip extension.also...10 round max in our mags... the grip looking at gen 3 19 and 22 look like its a different thickness and yes the 23 is shorter.
the barrels that are going on are lone wolf silver stainless. i couldnt get them to put on threaded...i figured it sticks out why cant it be threaded...so if i get it ill take it somewhere and have that done.
but the 23 is basically going to cost me what..$300 more than the 22.llseems tough to stomach that 300 for it
A LWD barrel is not worth even 1/3rd that IMO. I understand you have to have a longer barrel because of Canadian law but no way it is worth that much. If it were a Bar Sto custom fit I could stomach it.
jbglock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 05:35   #18
Eaz8
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 55
What would you guys think if I add the s&w MP40 range and carry kit.
Its $650 new here comes with case, 3 mags, speed loader, holster and mag holder.
It seems to be the best deal, but is it a comparable pistol to the glock 22?

I may have a line on the beretta 96 .40 new in box for $600+tax, was to be issued to a officer but it didn't. So its been sitting a few years untouched.
Eaz8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 05:37   #19
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 92,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eaz8 View Post
What would you guys think if I add the s&w MP40 range and carry kit.
Its $650 new here comes with case, 3 mags, speed loader, holster and mag holder.
It seems to be the best deal, but is it a comparable pistol to the glock 22?
I like the M&P better than the Glock.
__________________
.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
bac1023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2012, 05:49   #20
HexHead
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooster Rugburn View Post
Easy solution: Get the G23 and an X-Grip or one of the others. It's two guns in one. The G23 can use G22 mags, and with a grip extension, it's basically the same. With that setup, EVERY argument that can be made for the full size G22 can be made for the G23 with the grip extension. You have the G22 size and capacity, and the G23 reduced size.

You can make the G23 into a G22, but you cannot make a G22 into a G23.
Except the longer sight radius and the more generous spacing of the finger grooves on the 22. Carry is not an option for him. There is no reason or rationale to choose the 23 over the 22.
HexHead is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 00:59.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 601
151 Members
450 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31