GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2012, 08:43   #1
District18
Senior Member
 
District18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 377
Hot Loads in a K Frame?

I've heard it before, don't run a lot of hot loads through a K frame, but I was wondering if anyone here has. Specifically I have a model 65 ladysmith 3". I'm wondering how hot can I go without trashing my gun? Are Buffalo Bores heavy .357 loads out of the question?
District18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 09:37   #2
CanMan
Senior Member
 
CanMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: in flagrante
Posts: 972
Quote:
Originally Posted by District18 View Post
I've heard it before, don't run a lot of hot loads through a K frame, but I was wondering if anyone here has. Specifically I have a model 65 ladysmith 3". I'm wondering how hot can I go without trashing my gun? Are Buffalo Bores heavy .357 loads out of the question?

I haven't put a lot of 'hot loads' through my Model 19, but then again I'm not a real fan of max/hot loads anyway. I don't think a moderate diet of the hot stuff will hurt anything. Let forcing cone and top strap erosion be the limiting factor...the hotter the load, the more it's gonna happen. Recoil usually dictates the number of hot loads I want to shoot!
CanMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 19:57   #3
countrygun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 17,068
I too shoot/carry a 3' 65 among several "K" frames and have been shooting some since the '70s. I paid close attention to this issue when it was a "current" topic. I have explained it a coouple dozen times and have finally come to a "simple explanation that saves me time, to wit:

The problem arises with 125 gn and lighter bullets driven at magnum velocities since these projectiles lack the momentum to transition from cylinder to forcing cone in a smooth" manner. They tend to hesitate in the forcing cone until the pressure "bumps" them on their way. This puts pressure on the forcing cone it was not intended to absorb. That coupled with the flat taken off the bottom of the forcing cone increase the potential for cracking. It also explains the flame cutting of the topstrap as the pressure vents at the cylinder gap.

The heavier 158 gn bullets seem to transition smoother and are far less prone to this issue.

Many people have argued this, but it is easy for someone who reloads to test the theory.

Given the range from low .38 loads to top .357 loads it is easy to find a load of a favorite powder that is safe for both 125 gn and 158 gn bullets (final velocity is unimportant.) load a few cases with each bullet weight and the same amount of powder behind both and then have someone else fire them on a darkened range while you observe the flash at the barrel/cylinder gap. If the explanation (theory) is incorrect there should be no difference between the flash, but if it is correct it will be obvious. (BTW I suggest 2400 for the powder, it gives a very satisfactory demonstration of the principle.)

Last edited by countrygun; 10-24-2012 at 18:00..
countrygun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 00:21   #4
District18
Senior Member
 
District18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 377
Thanks guys for the input.
District18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 22:35   #5
gunsmoke92
Senior Member
 
gunsmoke92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Rigby, Idaho
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by District18 View Post
I've heard it before, don't run a lot of hot loads through a K frame, but I was wondering if anyone here has. Specifically I have a model 65 ladysmith 3". I'm wondering how hot can I go without trashing my gun? Are Buffalo Bores heavy .357 loads out of the question?
countrygun and CanMan have given you a lot of good information.

Now let me try and give you some more concerning your last question. The last thing I would run through any K frame is Buffalo Bore. Don't get me wrong, Buffalo Bore is great ammo, if you're sporting an L or N frame Smith, or a Ruger. You need to understand that the K frames were originally .38s modified to accept the new .357 cartridge, hence the flat undercut in the forcing cone area which allowed for installation of the larger crane and cylinder. The completely redesigned L frame guns corrected that weakness. Get one of those if you're really into "hot" loads, save your K frame for something a little more pleasant and it will serve you well for many years to come.
__________________
The best defense is a good offense, and I'm really offensive.
SFC, U.S. Army, Retired 1971 - 1992
S&W Club #92, Snubbie club #92, The 21 Club #92, The Big Dawg club #1992

Last edited by gunsmoke92; 10-20-2012 at 22:45..
gunsmoke92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 15:29   #6
bac1023
Senior Member
 
bac1023's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 92,697
I would never run Buffalo Bore through a K frame.
__________________
.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
bac1023 is online now   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,019
306 Members
713 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31