GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2012, 10:17   #1
fendertele87
Senior Member
 
fendertele87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 184
Polymer AR-15 Lower

Looking to start a build kit for an AR. I found a good deal on a polymer lower by "ATI Omni Stripped Lower Receiver" looking to see if anybody knows much about having a polymer lower or this company.
fendertele87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 11:24   #2
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 7,793
Polymer AR lowers are problems in waiting. I have seen far too many that cracked, usually around the takedown pins or the threads for the buffer tube.

Yes, Glocks are made of polymer, but their design incorporated that from the beginning, and they still use metal reinforcement in many places. Very few (if any) AR lowers use such reinforcements, and the AR platform was designed for metal receivers.

Yes, plenty of people here will rush to defend them. When you can get aluminum, made to spec lowers for $20-50 more, though, why would you buy the inferior material? That extra $50 (worst case) is less than 10% of the cost of a half-decent AR build, yet it is for the serial numbered component and one of the more critical bts of the rifle.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
WoodenPlank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 11:43   #3
boomhower
Senior Member
 
boomhower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,307
If you are going to use it for a dedicated .22 then go for it. Otherwise get a real lower. Instead of getting that for $40 get a blem regular from the same site for $60. I'd rather had a visual blem than a cracked lower in a couple thousand rounds or less.
boomhower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 20:12   #4
collim1
Shower Time!
 
collim1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 10,442
One of my local shops has them for cheap. They dont interest me, but they built two rifles from them and have run them through a lot of rounds. They often let the nay sayers run a few mags through mags through them.

From what I hear they have been reliable and held up well for several thousand rounds.

I agree with the above post about using one to make a .22 AR.
collim1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 21:02   #5
frankmako
Senior Member
 
frankmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: From Parts Unknown
Posts: 851
i pickup a cal arms lower several years ago. builded a nice rifle with it. i have shot 1k's rounds plus and it has not given me any problems. no cracks, no nothing.
frankmako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 23:55   #6
Cole125
Silver Membership
Senior Member
 
Cole125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Far West, USA
Posts: 7,593
Don't buy it. Spend the extra money and get a mil-spec aluminum lower.
Cole125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 00:51   #7
NEOH212
Diesel Girl
 
NEOH212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East Ohio
Posts: 9,091
Do yourself a favor and get a alloy lower.

You can thank me later.
__________________
When you finish speaking, don't forget to wipe.
NEOH212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 09:11   #8
mac66
Plant the seed
 
mac66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Save America
Posts: 7,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodenPlank View Post
Polymer AR lowers are problems in waiting. I have seen far too many that cracked, usually around the takedown pins or the threads for the buffer tube.

Sounds like internet logic to me, i.e,. "saw it or heard about it on the internet so therefore it must be true."

Yes, Glocks are made of polymer, but their design incorporated that from the beginning, and they still use metal reinforcement in many places. Very few (if any) AR lowers use such reinforcements, and the AR platform was designed for metal receivers.

And if the right polymers were available when the AR was developed it would likely have been made from them back then. In the near future, all ARs will be plastic.

Yes, plenty of people here will rush to defend them. When you can get aluminum, made to spec lowers for $20-50 more, though, why would you buy the inferior material? That extra $50 (worst case) is less than 10% of the cost of a half-decent AR build, yet it is for the serial numbered component and one of the more critical bts of the rifle.

On the other hand, if you want a polymer AR lower just go buy one. I have several Cav Arms lowers and they have held up well to extended use. Not exactly the same thing but they are plastic.

My response in red above
__________________
Every American a Rifleman

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.
mac66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 09:21   #9
jbglock
Senior Member
 
jbglock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 467
I don't see why it should be an issue if the material is good. My Glocks don't have cracks around any of the pins. I'd prefer a poly lower just to decrease weight. Frankly you won't see acceptance of it by the masses until a big name like Colt or the military starts using them.
jbglock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 10:16   #10
WoodenPlank
Who?
 
WoodenPlank's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 7,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac66 View Post
My response in red above
Right, because ALL of my experience with the platform has been via Call of Duty and the internet...

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbglock View Post
I don't see why it should be an issue if the material is good. My Glocks don't have cracks around any of the pins. I'd prefer a poly lower just to decrease weight. Frankly you won't see acceptance of it by the masses until a big name like Colt or the military starts using them.
Again, Glocks were designed for polymer from the beginning. When you can build the design around the strengths and weaknesses of polymer, then it should come as no surprise that it does well. Aside form a few teething problems, look at the SCAR as an example of this. Same goes for Glock, the HK polymer handguns, the S&W M&P, and many of the other polymer-based SMGs and rifles coming out now. You will also notice that almost every single one of those still retains metal in strategic locations to ensure strength of the finished product - something that is lacking in most (if not all) AR polymer lowers.

Taking a design built from the beginning for metallic structural parts, and trying to make them from polymer is just asking for problems. Look how many times a polymer 1911 has been tried, and how many of them have failed miserably.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
WoodenPlank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 10:35   #11
Ruggles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tejas
Posts: 9,488
The don't "feel" right to me, too light I think. Throws off the overall feel of the gun for me.
Ruggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 11:52   #12
Cole125
Silver Membership
Senior Member
 
Cole125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Far West, USA
Posts: 7,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac66 View Post
My response in red above
The main issue I see with polymer lowers is the area that the buffer tube screws into, its a high stress area with little material.
Cole125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 13:23   #13
michael_b
BRC #1492
 
michael_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOH212 View Post
Do yourself a favor and get a alloy lower.

You can thank me later.
Lol no kidding. Pistols designed around polymer- great. Rifles designed for aluminum- stick with aluminum.
__________________
"The thing about quotes on the Internet is you cannot confirm their validity"- Abraham Lincoln

"Compromise on gun-rights? Did Rosa Parks settle for the middle of the bus?"-Mushinto
michael_b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 13:30   #14
denn1911
Senior Member
 
denn1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 1,666
I'd like to see someone with first hand knowledge post in this thread who has put up thousands of rounds through their polymer receiver AR. I'm curious how they'd stand up with someone who runs their rifle hard. The only polymer receiver AR that I own is a dedicated .22lR rifle M&P15-22. I'm hard on my gear and wouldn't take the chance on a polymer receiver AR.
denn1911 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 20:10.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,109
307 Members
802 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31