GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-01-2012, 15:22   #1
PurpleAngel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
M-1 Carbine, why not .45 Caliber?

When the U.S. Military (1940?) came up with the M-1 Carbine for non-front line troops, why could they have not just have used the .45 round instead of the .30 carbine round?
PurpleAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 17:33   #2
banger
Senior Member
 
banger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Where evil lives
Posts: 1,379
First, allow me to confess....

I am pulling this from my butt....

However, I seem to recall that the original spec. called for an effective range of 200 yards.

This alone would have disqualified the .45 from possible adoption.
banger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2012, 17:40   #3
collim1
Shower Time!
 
collim1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 8,831
They needed more velocity in order to have a 100+ yds effective range.
collim1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 00:05.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,155
479 Members
676 Guests

Most users ever online: 5,723
Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36