GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2011, 11:29   #1
AWMP
Senior Member
 
AWMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,428
anyone convert a S&W 642 to 9mm

Curious if anyone has converted their 38 spl S&W 642 to 9mm?

How is the recoil in 9mm?

Pics?
AWMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2011, 13:13   #2
1 old 0311
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 4,254
www.moonclips.com
1 old 0311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 09:26   #3
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Glenn E. Meyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TX
Posts: 8,593
Discussed in detail on the SW forums. It has been done with 940 cylinders into other Js that would fit it.
__________________
NTI, TSRA, NRA,IDPA Niner #2001 Black Rifle AR-101 Wheelie 442642 L'star 101 J Snub 432
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Being an Academic Shooter

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Being an Active Shooter
Glenn E. Meyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2011, 10:50   #4
BillJ
Member
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central NV
Posts: 81
I've owned a 940. The recoil is less, but is for lack of a better term more "snappy" or "quicker". I don't think 90% of people would notice the difference in a small steel J frame. Maybe on the 642 because of the alloy you'd notice it a tad more.

Once you step up to the 547 vs model 10 its completely noticeable.

The only reason to go to 9mm in a revolver is to take advantage of moon clips, for quick reloads. Other then that the 38 spl will do anything a 9mm will do.
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 17:23   #5
voiceofreason
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 67
My friend owned a 940. It was fun to shoot knowing it was a 9mm, but it's pretty pointless IMO.
voiceofreason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2011, 20:43   #6
Brian Dover
Senior Member
 
Brian Dover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,446
I had a S&W armorer/local smith order me a Model 940 cylinder. I fitted it up to a Model 637. It works fine either way. Most of my shooting with it is done with reduced power 9mm handloads; if carried for defensive use it's got 115 grain +P ammo aboard.

No idea if Model 940 cylinders are still available from the factory, cobbled mine together over 10 years ago. By the way that cylinder was oversized in a couple dimensions; I was able to (very carefully) fit it up myself but your mileage may vary as the saying goes.
__________________
"Rex, you shot him in the head!---How do you feel about that?" --'Rustler's Rhapsody'

Last edited by Brian Dover; 12-17-2011 at 20:44..
Brian Dover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2012, 13:14   #7
pizza_pablo
USN Retired
 
pizza_pablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Western WA
Posts: 2,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by voiceofreason View Post
My friend owned a 940. It was fun to shoot knowing it was a 9mm, but it's pretty pointless IMO.
I think the point is that an officer with a 9mm service pistol could carry a 940 (or the like) as a BUG and use his 9mm pistol magazines to feed reload rounds, if neccessary, giving him a revolver, as a BUG, as opposed to another semi, but maintaining the same caliber.
If a wheel gun doesn't fire, in a gut close encounter, where your off hand is occupied, simply pulling the trigger, will access a new round, where a pistold would require racking of the slide.
My 2.
__________________
If liberals don't want us to treat every Muslim like a terrorist, why do they treat every gun owner like the Newtown shooter?
pizza_pablo is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 13:22.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,174
307 Members
867 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42