Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
|
07-09-2012, 11:44
|
#26
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fremont, IN
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxtrotx1
Technically? She is doing fine. Almost 100 percent.
You should do some reading on how well the 9mm FMJ does for the US military.
|
Did some more reading on her. That's crazy how well she is doing after that kind of wound. That guy did kill a lot of other people though, including a 9 year old girl. I don't really like using this incident to judge the effectiveness of a cartridge. It's kinda ****ed up.
R.I.P. Christina Green
Last edited by Gertz; 07-09-2012 at 11:48..
|
|
|
07-09-2012, 13:00
|
#27
|
|
Mmmm... Liver.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Old Colorado City
Posts: 18,785
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gertz
I still trying to look into the "low recoil" powder. I don't really know about that. I'd imagine it'd be a slower burning powder, which I wouldn't like.
|
Well, you're not going to get a fast projectile without using a slower burning powder. No free lunch, amigo.
As far as recoil, it totally depends on the load. I use some fast powder / heavy for caliber bullet combos that recoil fairly light - seems to be the popular combo in gun games. I also have tried Unique and WSF side by side and found the WSF load to be much smoother.
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
07-09-2012, 13:01
|
#28
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,017
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gertz
Did some more reading on her. That's crazy how well she is doing after that kind of wound. That guy did kill a lot of other people though, including a 9 year old girl. I don't really like using this incident to judge the effectiveness of a cartridge. It's kinda ****ed up.
R.I.P. Christina Green
|
There is nothing wrong with taking a positive out of a terrible event.
Like the medical knowledge we gained from the Nazis experiments in ww2. It would be a waste and shame if we didn't use it for good.
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.
Eagle Scout.
|
|
|
07-09-2012, 13:02
|
#29
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,017
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gertz
I just don't like hollow points, and I really just started this thread looking for some ammo. I don't want to go into it that much. I like my 9mm FMJ. I'd prefer, however, a Winchester Model 70 in a 30-06. Something like that I'd switch to a flat nose or soft point but I just don't like hollow points.
To each his own
|
Well your distaste in hollow points could get someone hurt. A 9mm fmj is going a long way on a miss.
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.
Eagle Scout.
|
|
|
07-09-2012, 13:03
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 19,677
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gertz
I like the underwood ammo. I don't really like HP ammunition though. I like FMJ with a 9mm so I keep my tumble effect/penetration.
|
This is kind of a BS though. Whether the bullet tumbles or not is in the design, not the vel. So all a faster FMJ gets you is it leaves the target sooner. Not much point in FMJ IMO, just poking less than caliber holes, UNLESS it hits bone or tumbles & there is just no guarantee either will happen. BTW, if the bullet does tumble, penetration is reduced drastically in any caliber. Damage goes up, but penetration goes down.
Reality, most RNFMJ will veer or deflect & not tumble & that comes at the end as the bullet slows. That loss of straight line penetration could mean a miss on vitals instead of a hit. The Gifford shooting is such an anectdotal event. A properly built JHP will straight line penetrate & cause a much larger perm wound channel leading to faster incapacitation. Think about it, one reason FMJ is banned for hunting in almost all states & is only prefered in Africa for thick skinned, large boned DG.
Yes, to each his own, but for most of us, FMJ is a handicap & you are already handicapped having to use a handgun for SD. Why make it worse, especially since your thought about penetration & tumbling are really counter to each other.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
Last edited by fredj338; 07-09-2012 at 21:54..
|
|
|
07-09-2012, 13:05
|
#31
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 4,017
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338
This is kind of a BS though. Whether the bullet tumbles or not is in the design, not the vel. So all faster FMJ gets you is it leaves the target sooner. Not much point in FMJ IMO, just poking less than caliber holes, UNLESS it hits bone or tumbles & there is just no guarantee either will happen. BTW, if the bullet does tumble, penetration is reduced drastically in any caliber. Damage goes up, but penetration goes down. 
|
Listen to Fred, hes a very informed member here.
Worst case:
__________________
Tin Foil Free Zone.
Eagle Scout.
|
|
|
07-09-2012, 16:16
|
#32
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fremont, IN
Posts: 35
|
This is getting too heated for me!! EJECT!! EJECT!!! EJECT!!!!
Last edited by Gertz; 07-09-2012 at 16:20..
|
|
|
07-09-2012, 16:17
|
#33
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 23,205
|
Why not just go with a FMJ .357 Sig or a FMJ .38 super?
Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
__________________
"If your plan is for one year, plant rice.
If your plan is for ten years, plant trees.
If your plan is for one hundred years,
educate children." -- Confucius
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26.
|
|
|