GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-14-2012, 16:04   #76
PlasticGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagTen View Post
I am using 3 different loads.
You have mentioned a few in this thread, but the one that started this thread was a 150 grain lead bullet over 4.2 grains of Bullseye.

You are using jacketed bullet max-load data with a lead bullet that's a few grains heavier. Lead will shoot faster for a given amount of powder, but it will also operated at higher pressures. You keep saying you have data for this load to prove it's safe, but I still don't see it. Am I missing something?
__________________
I'd be a better listener if you stopped talking about stupid crap that doesn't matter.
PlasticGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2012, 16:08   #77
PlasticGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by RWBlue View Post
Not for you, but Plastic guy. He was saying there are better powders. I would like to know which ones.
I don't know because I have never tried. I would guess the slowest powders you can find data for would be best. Bullseye seems like a pretty fast powder for that application. That's just an educated guess from loading heavy bullets for other handgun calibers with similar barrel lengths though.

My comments were not based around the fact that I have an idea for a better performing load, but rather that the load he is/was using is over-pressure.
__________________
I'd be a better listener if you stopped talking about stupid crap that doesn't matter.
PlasticGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 12:02   #78
ss30378
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Alabama
Posts: 64
Here's a topic on successful use of a 173gr swc in 9mm

www.czfirearms.us/index.php?topic=46995.0


Neat load, i like seeing people push the envelope. 2.4 grains of unique with an oal of 1.100" pics are in there as well. Im sure most will say why, but why not. I like many handload to make what i want, and see just what i can do that i cant get from the factory. The cost savings is a bonus. If i wanted to handload just to equal factory fodder it takes all the fun out of it for me. Seems like it would be like buying a mustang and rebuilding the motor to stock specs... boring. For me its big heads monster cam, blower or turbo! I like seeing oddballs and things that are out of the norm. I know if i saw someone shooting keith bullets out of a 9mm at the range i'd be asking questions.
ss30378 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2012, 18:54   #79
MagTen
Senior Member
 
MagTen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: TarHeel State
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlasticGuy View Post
I don't know because I have never tried. I would guess the slowest powders you can find data for would be best. Bullseye seems like a pretty fast powder for that application. That's just an educated guess from loading heavy bullets for other handgun calibers with similar barrel lengths though.

My comments were not based around the fact that I have an idea for a better performing load, but rather that the load he is/was using is over-pressure.
It's not over pressure if it is 20 degrees outside.
MagTen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 04:09   #80
PlasticGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagTen View Post
It's not over pressure if it is 20 degrees outside.
How do you know?
__________________
I'd be a better listener if you stopped talking about stupid crap that doesn't matter.
PlasticGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2012, 04:21   #81
MagTen
Senior Member
 
MagTen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: TarHeel State
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlasticGuy View Post
How do you know?
We placed several loads in the freezor and cooled them. Had the chrony setup and shot them. Speed was reduced 15% from loads at room temp. If speed was reduced the pressures are reduced. I developed these loads to use in western NC in December.
MagTen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2012, 12:26   #82
PlasticGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagTen View Post
We placed several loads in the freezor and cooled them. Had the chrony setup and shot them. Speed was reduced 15% from loads at room temp. If speed was reduced the pressures are reduced. I developed these loads to use in western NC in December.
Let me get this straight. You know velocities drop 15% when the cartridges are frozen because you have shot these over-pressure loads when they are not frozen?
__________________
I'd be a better listener if you stopped talking about stupid crap that doesn't matter.
PlasticGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 14:19   #83
MagTen
Senior Member
 
MagTen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: TarHeel State
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlasticGuy View Post
Let me get this straight. You know velocities drop 15% when the cartridges are frozen because you have shot these over-pressure loads when they are not frozen?
We compared factory spec loads at 70 degree temps and froze loads as saw 15% drop across the board. Even the hottest Double Tap loads droppped 15%.
MagTen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 22:24   #84
PlasticGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagTen View Post
We compared factory spec loads at 70 degree temps and froze loads as saw 15% drop across the board. Even the hottest Double Tap loads droppped 15%.
So you have no idea if you get a 15% drop in velocity with the drop in temperature with that particular load. And you have no idea what the pressure is at any tempurature. Or am I missing something?
__________________
I'd be a better listener if you stopped talking about stupid crap that doesn't matter.
PlasticGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2012, 23:00   #85
Zombie Steve
Mmmm... Liver.
 
Zombie Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Old Colorado City
Posts: 18,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagTen View Post
We compared factory spec loads at 70 degree temps and froze loads as saw 15% drop across the board. Even the hottest Double Tap loads droppped 15%.
Wonderful. Doesn't make a bit of difference unless you know what powder they're using (they don't often use canister powders) and you're using the same.

AA2230 is very temp sensitive, Varget is almost completely insensitive. Solo is reverse temp sensitive (higher pressures in the cold).

You don't have to kick water uphill to get a heavy 9mm bullet to go really, really fast.

Click the image to open in full size.
Zombie Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 03:15   #86
MagTen
Senior Member
 
MagTen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: TarHeel State
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zombie Steve View Post
Wonderful. Doesn't make a bit of difference unless you know what powder they're using (they don't often use canister powders) and you're using the same.

AA2230 is very temp sensitive, Varget is almost completely insensitive. Solo is reverse temp sensitive (higher pressures in the cold).

You don't have to kick water uphill to get a heavy 9mm bullet to go really, really fast.
I did not say I was using factory loads I said factory spec loads.
MagTen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 09:46   #87
Zombie Steve
Mmmm... Liver.
 
Zombie Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Old Colorado City
Posts: 18,785
Must load your own double tap as well.
Zombie Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:01.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 968
425 Members
543 Guests

Most users ever online: 5,723
Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36