Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2012, 13:35   #1
CaptainXL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 298
Lyman & Lee Manuals

Just noticed this --- Both the Lyman's 49th Edition and the Lee 2nd Edition Loading Manuals have notations in the .40 S&W sections of thier books that say not to use the data shown in for .40 S&W in chambers that are not fully supported.

Specifically, in the .40 S&W section of the Lee 2nd Edition manaul it says: "Do not use reloads in Glock or similar guns with chambers that do not fully support the cartrige due to intruision of the feed ramp."

The Lyman 49th Edition .40 S&W section it says: "Warning: Only use this data in handguns that fully support the cartridge in the chamber. If used in unsupported chambers, cases can ruture and cause harm to the shooter or bystanders."

There are not any of the "warnings" printed in sections of the reloading manuals for any other calibers. The "warnings" are printed only in the .40 S&W sections both of the reloading manuals.

Up until now I have reloaded only for 9mm. I have not loaded .40 S&W up until this point but recently bought a set of .40 S&W dies with plans to load for a G27.

WTF??? Are they serious? I assume that everyone just ignores the warnings. Or, am I wrong? Should I take the warnings seriously and load .40 S&W only in lighter loads?
__________________
I don't dial 911 -- I dial G-L-O-C-K using one touch dialing.
CaptainXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 13:51   #2
TN.Frank
Mad Hatter
 
TN.Frank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Down the Rabbit Hole
Posts: 4,142
Basically it's CYA for those Glock "Kabooms" that happen once in a blue moon. They don't want to be held responsible IF something happens like that.
__________________
*Glock G19 Gen3, RTF2*
TN.Frank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 13:54   #3
Colorado4Wheel
Senior Member
 
Colorado4Wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CO
Posts: 14,357
Ignore it and just look for warning signs. Most Glock barrels now are very well supported.
__________________
Steve
Colorado4Wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 14:18   #4
SJ 40
Senior Member
 
SJ 40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 7,352
Lawyer Ease,CYA ! SJ 40
SJ 40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 14:20   #5
CaptainXL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 298
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado4Wheel View Post
Ignore it and just look for warning signs. Most Glock barrels now are very well supported.
That's what I figured. I've read too many posts on this forum to think that anyone really paid any attention to the warnings.

I guess everyone has to keep their back sides covered but I'm still curious as to why the warnings are only printed in the .40 S&W sections of the two manuals and not all of the other caliber sections of the books.

Oh well, onwards and upwards.

Hopefully will begin reloading some Precision Delta 180 gr FMJ .40's next week for the first time. Plan on using some Unique and some PP to work up some test loads.

Have only loaded 9mm's up until this point in time.
__________________
I don't dial 911 -- I dial G-L-O-C-K using one touch dialing.
CaptainXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 15:02   #6
F106 Fan
Senior Member
 
F106 Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,972
I wouldn't ignore the warnings! Suppose I had a Glock Gen 1 .40. That chamber isn't very well supported. Or course, I am guessing that there is actually a Gen 1 .40 - I wouldn't know. Sometime back, actually, a long time back, there was a problem with Glock .40s.

But it IS a fact that there are still Glocks in circulation where the feedramp seriously undercuts the chamber.

I would check my chamber by dropping a round in place and see what I thought about the support of the case near the feedramp.

Somebody on this forum posts photos of the various barrels and I know I have seen similar photos in General Glocking. A forum search will probably turn up something.

There's a reason the warnings are there. For newer models it may not be an issue but it certainly used to be a problem. As the warnings are only related to .40, it is also apparent that the folks writing the manual knew exactly which guns had the defect.

Richard
__________________
"No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up." - Lily Tomlin
F106 Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 15:33   #7
Colorado4Wheel
Senior Member
 
Colorado4Wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CO
Posts: 14,357
You worry about everything. I said ignore the warning AND LOOK FOR WARNING SIGNS. Factory ammo in .40 is sometimes kinda stout PLUS brass in .40 back in the early days was a little thin. Download modern brass just a bit and it will work fine even in the old barrels.
__________________
Steve

Last edited by Colorado4Wheel; 05-31-2012 at 16:16..
Colorado4Wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 16:11   #8
F106 Fan
Senior Member
 
F106 Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,972
I agree!

Look for signs by checking the round in the chamber and by looking at expended brass. Look for the photos of the unsupported chambers and look for photos of the Glock pimple. Good information to have.

But the tipoff that looking is even required is right there in the manual. There was, at one time, a problem sufficient to justify adding the warning to the manual. Just something to show that some amount of investigation is warranted.

Were it not for the published warnings, this thread wouldn't even exist.

I have heard that Federal brass was a little wimpy in the early days but I have seen the photos of the unsupported cases and the Glock dimple.

Richard
__________________
"No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up." - Lily Tomlin

Last edited by F106 Fan; 05-31-2012 at 16:15..
F106 Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 16:45   #9
WiskyT
Malcontent
 
WiskyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,764
They have a term for that. It's called the "Ski Pass" syndrome or something like that. Back in the 70's, the ski resorts were getting sued. So they put a simple warning on the back of the lift pass. After a few years, the warnings had gotten so long, convoluted, and the print was so small, that no one bothered to read it anymore. That's what is going on here. They provide data and then spend a chapter in the beginning, and then several more throughout the manual, warning you to not use any of the info in the book.
__________________
Drugs are bad because if you do drugs you're a hippie and hippies suck.
Eric Cartman


"If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting."-General Curtis E. LeMay
WiskyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 16:54   #10
ColoCG
Senior Member
 
ColoCG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by F106 Fan View Post
I agree!

Look for signs by checking the round in the chamber and by looking at expended brass. Look for the photos of the unsupported chambers and look for photos of the Glock pimple. Good information to have.

But the tipoff that looking is even required is right there in the manual. There was, at one time, a problem sufficient to justify adding the warning to the manual. Just something to show that some amount of investigation is warranted.

Were it not for the published warnings, this thread wouldn't even exist.

I have heard that Federal brass was a little wimpy in the early days but I have seen the photos of the unsupported cases and the Glock dimple.

Richard
Ok, your confusing me now! Which isn't hard, is it pimple or dimple and is that anything like bulge?
__________________
Charlie

Last edited by ColoCG; 05-31-2012 at 16:55..
ColoCG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 16:58   #11
michael e
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,809
I noticed this in a couple of my new ones, in my older ones it doesnt have this warning. Got another one that has a full page of disclaimers, boils down to someone tried to blame them for something and lawyers got involved. Old guy at work has some books from the 70s that make the loads in my books look like powder puff loads.
michael e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 17:46   #12
Highspeedlane
NRA Life Member
 
Highspeedlane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MA and N.C.
Posts: 3,580
I have a Gen 2 made in 1995 and the chamber was huge. Looking at cases from it, I can see where the brass would likely fatigue pretty quick from resizing and reloading.

Glock barrel on left, Wilson match barrel on right. What a difference.

Reloading
__________________
I'm a non-paid, non-attorney spokesman.
Highspeedlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 18:11   #13
SARDG
Senior Member
 
SARDG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Florida's Left Coast
Posts: 7,656
Glock Gen 2 introduced in March 1989. Gen 3 introduced in January 1998. .40 S&W designed in January 1990 and introduced several months later.

There are though, I believe, three Glock chamber/barrel iterations for .40 S&W.
SARDG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 18:48   #14
F106 Fan
Senior Member
 
F106 Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoCG View Post
Ok, your confusing me now! Which isn't hard, is it pimple or dimple and is that anything like bulge?
I always thought of the bulge as a large ring entirely around the case. The entire chamber is too large.

OTOH, the pimple (or dimple or whatever) is a section of brass that is bulged out right where it meets the feedramp. There are plenty of example photos of brass failure in this region. The entire head doesn't separate, just a blown out area where the feedramp is overcut.

I realize this is kind of an old problem and it's been known for years and years. But it's strictly a .40 S&W Glock problem that, AFAIK, has since been corrected. Still, there are probably barrels around from the earlier versions.

I don't load .40 but if I ever do, it will be for a Sig 229.

Richard
__________________
"No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up." - Lily Tomlin

Last edited by F106 Fan; 05-31-2012 at 21:18..
F106 Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 18:51   #15
Colorado4Wheel
Senior Member
 
Colorado4Wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CO
Posts: 14,357
Booooooo.


I hope I didn't scare anyone.
__________________
Steve

Last edited by Colorado4Wheel; 05-31-2012 at 18:54..
Colorado4Wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 18:57   #16
F106 Fan
Senior Member
 
F106 Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,972
Well, I do load for a Glock G21SF so that ought to count for something.

The P229 would be a match for my wife's duty weapon. There's no way we're going to shoot reloads in the department's weapon but we might just buy a duplicate to use in practice.

Around here, both the PD and the SO use Sigs - just the way the choices came out. The patrol guys use a P226 and the plainclothes folks use a P229.

Richard
__________________
"No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up." - Lily Tomlin
F106 Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 19:40   #17
dkf
Senior Member
 
dkf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highspeedlane View Post
Glock barrel on left, Wilson match barrel on right. What a difference.

Reloading
For carry I'll take the barrel on the left any day.

Here is a new vs old pic with a LW thrown in. As you can see the newer Glock barrel is better and good enough for me.

Reloading
dkf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 20:27   #18
Zombie Steve
Decap Pin Killa
 
Zombie Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Old Colorado City
Posts: 19,935
Start loading .45 auto. Problem solved.
Zombie Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 22:02   #19
ColoCG
Senior Member
 
ColoCG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by F106 Fan View Post
I always thought of the bulge as a large ring entirely around the case. The entire chamber is too large.

OTOH, the pimple (or dimple or whatever) is a section of brass that is bulged out right where it meets the feedramp. There are plenty of example photos of brass failure in this region. The entire head doesn't separate, just a blown out area where the feedramp is overcut.

I realize this is kind of an old problem and it's been known for years and years. But it's strictly a .40 S&W Glock problem that, AFAIK, has since been corrected. Still, there are probably barrels around from the earlier versions.

I don't load .40 but if I ever do, it will be for a Sig 229.

Richard
Well I'm glad you cleared that up.

I also have an old Gen 2 G23 in .40 That never had a bulge of any size on it. For years I even did a couple of things with it that I didn't know you wern't supposed to do until I started reading on the internet.

And that was load lead in the factory barrel and they were 155gr lead swc to boot. They fed, fired, and ejected fine without any noteworthy leading or bulges or pimples or dimples.
__________________
Charlie

Last edited by ColoCG; 05-31-2012 at 22:21..
ColoCG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 08:07   #20
wdphillips
Senior Member
 
wdphillips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Trinidad, Colorado
Posts: 291
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkf View Post
Here is a new vs old pic with a LW thrown in. As you can see the newer Glock barrel is better and good enough for me.

Reloading
Yep, that is why I use my LW barrel for reloads and the Glock Factory barrel for factory ammo.
__________________
G10, G17, G21, G22, G30, G33... Lone Wolf barrels for G10, G17, G21, G22 (9mm, .357SIG), G30, G33 (.40 S&W, 9mm)! Ruger Old Army, Colt AR-15 SP1, BCM A4 AR-15, Advanced Armament 300 AAC BLACKOUT

Vietnam Veteran, NRA Life Member
wdphillips is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply


Tags
.40 s&w, reloading manual, unsupported chamber, warning
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 23:46.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 924
177 Members
747 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31