GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2012, 08:52   #1
Mrs Glockrunner
Senior Member
 
Mrs Glockrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,784
Tidbit Of Naval History

Try this in today’s Navy!

The U. S. S. Constitution (Old Ironsides), as a combat vessel, carried 48,600 gallons of fresh water for her crew of 475 officers and men.
This was sufficient to last six months of sustained operations at sea.
She carried no evaporators (i.e. fresh water distillers).
However, let it be noted that according to her ship's log, "On July 27, 1798,
the U.S.S. Constitution sailed from Boston with a full complement of 475 officers and men,
48,600 gallons of fresh water,
7,400 cannon shot,
11,600 pounds of black powder
and
79,400 gallons of rum."
Her mission: "To destroy and harass English shipping."
Making Jamaica on 6 October, she took on 826 pounds of flour and 68,300 gallons of rum.
Then she headed for the Azores , arriving there 12 November.
She provisioned with 550 pounds of beef and 64,300 gallons of Portuguese wine.
On 18 November, she set sail for England .
In the ensuing days she defeated five British men-of-war and captured and scuttled 12 English merchant ships,
salvaging only the rum aboard each.
By 26 January, her powder and shot were exhausted.
Nevertheless, although unarmed she made a night raid up the Firth of Clyde in Scotland.
Her landing party captured a whiskey distillery and transferred 40,000 gallons of single malt Scotch aboard by dawn.
Then she headed home.
The U. S. S. Constitution arrived in Boston on 20 February 1799,
with no cannon shot,
no food,
no powder,
no rum,
no wine,
no whiskey,
and
38,600 gallons of water.
Go Navy!!!
Mrs Glockrunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 10:37   #2
Fred Hansen
Liberal Bane
 
Fred Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 14,263









__________________
Xmas card from Afghanistan: "Uncle Fred, Well they're not too big on Christmas spirit over here. Maybe it's because they don't have any Christmas trees, or maybe it's because they wipe their ass with their hand..." My nephew Cpl Mitchell U.S.M.C.
Fred Hansen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 10:55   #3
SC Tiger
Senior Member
 
SC Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Glockrunner View Post
Try this in today’s Navy!




The U. S. S. Constitution (Old Ironsides), as a combat vessel, carried 48,600 gallons of fresh water for her crew of 475 officers and men.


This was sufficient to last six months of sustained operations at sea.


She carried no evaporators (i.e. fresh water distillers).


However, let it be noted that according to her ship's log, "On July 27, 1798,


the U.S.S. Constitution sailed from Boston with a full complement of 475 officers and men,


48,600 gallons of fresh water,


7,400 cannon shot,


11,600 pounds of black powder


and


79,400 gallons of rum."


Her mission: "To destroy and harass English shipping."


Making Jamaica on 6 October, she took on 826 pounds of flour and 68,300 gallons of rum.


Then she headed for the Azores , arriving there 12 November.


She provisioned with 550 pounds of beef and 64,300 gallons of Portuguese wine.


On 18 November, she set sail for England .


In the ensuing days she defeated five British men-of-war and captured and scuttled 12 English merchant ships,


salvaging only the rum aboard each.


By 26 January, her powder and shot were exhausted.


Nevertheless, although unarmed she made a night raid up the Firth of Clyde in Scotland.


Her landing party captured a whiskey distillery and transferred 40,000 gallons of single malt Scotch aboard by dawn.


Then she headed home.


The U. S. S. Constitution arrived in Boston on 20 February 1799,


with no cannon shot,


no food,


no powder,


no rum,


no wine,


no whiskey,


and


38,600 gallons of water.


Go Navy!!!
From what I've read about those days, to stay at sea that long without going insane you'd have to be drunk.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keoking View Post
If you're gonna be stupid, don't pull up short. Saddle up and ride it all the way in.
SC Tiger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 11:03   #4
robin303
Helicopter Nut
 
robin303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6,275
Sounds like a party ship.
__________________
G19 RTF w/gills
G17 RTF w/gills
robin303 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012, 12:45   #5
erkman
Sleepy Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NE Alabama
Posts: 45
Sounds like a fun trip
erkman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 12:57   #6
fwm
Senior Member
 
fwm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Near Central US
Posts: 2,854
Sounds like all my barefoot cruises, except we raided Aruba, Bonaire, Curacau, Tortolla and Porta Bella, for the rum, and only attacked boats with women on board.
__________________
fwm
fwm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 18:34   #7
Brian Lee
Drop those nuts
 
Brian Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Up a tree.
Posts: 6,640
So somebody is actually claiming that 475 guys consumed 252,000 total gallons of hard booze, (not including the unspecified amounts taken from 12 other ships), over a period of only about 200 days???

That's about 2.65 GALLONS, per person, per day....... Does anyone really consider that believable?

As for water, 48,600 gallons consumed by 475 guys over 200 days is about 0.5 gallons per person, per day. Not quite a safe amount IMO, since I drink more water than that, so it's clear they would have probably obtained more water along the way at every opportunity. If they had drank only the 10,000 gallons implied above, then each guy would only have drank one tenth of a gallon a day, and I don't believe that for a second. You cannot simply replace the need for water with lots of booze - you'll die, and the ship would have never made it home.

Maybe they sold the most of the booze for cash and put it in their pockets??

Last edited by Brian Lee; 05-08-2012 at 18:37..
Brian Lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2012, 18:43   #8
MadMonkey
Spershul Furces
 
MadMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 2,692
Send a message via AIM to MadMonkey Send a message via Yahoo to MadMonkey
I prefer that other ship that had one million bales of the best Sligo rags, two million barrels of stones, three million sides of old blind horses hides, four million barrels of bones, five million hogs, six million dogs, seven million barrels of porter, and eight million bails of old nanny goats' tails.

MadMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 962
458 Members
504 Guests

Most users ever online: 5,723
Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36