Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
02-18-2012, 18:30
|
#1
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Larsen, Wisconsin
Posts: 34
|
Glock Jamming
I have a glock 17 with a lone wolf extended barrel with a compensator on the end. Every bullet jams when trying to eject. I am using 115 grain winchester ammo. Any suggestions to fix issue.
|
|
|
02-18-2012, 19:24
|
#2
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 35
|
Go back to stock parts.
Last edited by odglock17; 02-18-2012 at 19:24..
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
02-19-2012, 03:03
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ND
Posts: 17
|
Did you change the weight of the recoil spring?
Trying going down to something like an 11lbs spring.
|
|
|
02-19-2012, 03:31
|
#4
|
|
CLM Number 185
Federal Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Beaumont,Texas
Posts: 25,081
|
Get rid of the compensator.
It is not allowing the slide to go all the way back to eject the round.
__________________
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs."
|
|
|
02-19-2012, 14:13
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glockdude1
Get rid of the compensator.
It is not allowing the slide to go all the way back to eject the round.

|
+1 on the compensator elimination. Am running a gen4 17 with a LW barrell and not a problem from the first round fired. The stock barrell was never fired, just the woofie. Gun leaves a nice pile of spent cases. All rounds have been reloads with 4.7 gr 231, 115 JHP Remingtons.
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 06:23
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: odessa texas
Posts: 7
|
Does this problem still exist when firing 124gr.+p or 147gr.+p ammo? If you can fire the heavier +p ammo with no problems your recoil spring is maybe too heavy. Is this a gen 4?
|
|
|
03-09-2012, 13:15
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Delaware
Posts: 1,521
|
Go back to OEM parts. If you want to play around with after market parts things like this happen. Glock got the reputation that is has by using factory (OEM) parts.
__________________
Certified Glock Armorer
It is all about shot placement.
|
|
|
03-10-2012, 14:18
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 454
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by captcurly
Go back to OEM parts. If you want to play around with after market parts things like this happen. Glock got the reputation that is has by using factory (OEM) parts.
|
+1 on the stock parts for the most part.
My experience with compensators on 1911s though is that they generally slow down and smooth out the recoil impulse (that's their job) and the use of lower powered springs brings functional reliability back. I probably wouldn't ever totally trust the pistol for everyday carry set up like that though. But that's just me.
__________________
"Speed is fine, but accuracy is final."
-Jeff Cooper
|
|
|
03-11-2012, 09:11
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SW Tennessee
Posts: 291
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by captcurly
Go back to OEM parts. If you want to play around with after market parts things like this happen. Glock got the reputation that is has by using factory (OEM) parts.
|
My Glock and other pistols remain stock unless there is a compelling reason to change something. Reliability is more important to me than the "ability" to improve.
|
|
|
03-21-2012, 08:55
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California
Posts: 134
|
One thing I had to learn the hard way with my Glocks is to keep them stock as a rock. All this aftermarket bulls%$@ seems to reduce their reliability.
|
|
|
03-21-2012, 17:47
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 782
|
You're not supposed to use 115 and LWD barrels
|
|
|
03-24-2012, 19:38
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bessemer, AL
Posts: 1,624
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3000fps
You're not supposed to use 115 and LWD barrels
|
Why not?
|
|
|
03-24-2012, 19:46
|
#13
|
|
CLM Number 185
Federal Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Beaumont,Texas
Posts: 25,081
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3000fps
You're not supposed to use 115 and LWD barrels
|
Why????
Is the barrel going to know the difference????
__________________
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs."
|
|
|
03-25-2012, 10:36
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
|
115gr in lwbbl
Go to Lone wolf's web site they will tell you why.
|
|
|
03-25-2012, 17:56
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern Delaware
Posts: 1,521
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by odglock17
Go back to stock parts.
|
What you said odglock17.
__________________
Certified Glock Armorer
It is all about shot placement.
|
|
|
03-26-2012, 07:34
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glockdeerhunter
I have a glock 17 with a lone wolf extended barrel with a compensator on the end. Every bullet jams when trying to eject. I am using 115 grain winchester ammo. Any suggestions to fix issue.
|
I bet your shooting Winchester White Box. Go back to the store, and get anything besides Winchester White Box 115 grain, and I'll bet it will cycle. Glocks with the LW barrels have trouble sometimes with Winchester White Box. I remember a LW Representative posting about this on another forum also. Any other 115 grain 124 grain or 147 should be fine. The Federal, and Remington are cheap at Wal-mart.
Lots of picky guns don't like WWB
__________________
When the 2nd Amendment speaks of a “well-regulated militia,” it means local groups of individuals operating to protect their own families, homes, and communities. Ron Paul
|
|
|
03-26-2012, 07:50
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Grants Pass, Oregon
Posts: 608
|
Here is a link to Lone Wolf's FAQ's page.
http://www.lonewolfdist.com/Content....AGE=FAQ%20page
It explains why the conversion barrels may experience problems with 115 grain ammo. Of coarse you could say, "But I am not using a conversion barrel". But you are using a compensator and that will add more weight causing issues for you and your G17. Good luck and stay safe.
Mike
|
|
|
04-02-2012, 20:56
|
#18
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 19
|
I would have to agree with several members on here when it comes to adding to many after market parts to your gun. You tend to run into liability issues. Glock is a fantastic firearm and in my opinion, it needs little to no modifacation. And befor I did anything to my gun I would reserch the pros and cons befor I started buying hundreds of dollars of after market parts.
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 04:11
|
#19
|
|
Deus Vult!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Penn's Woods
Posts: 10,738
|
There's some good advice in this thread; but, the comments about, 'keeping your Glock bone stock' are ingenuous. The only reason for a Glock owner to keep his Glock, 'bone stock' is because he doesn't really know what he's doing and, also, doesn't want to take the time or make the effort to learn.
As for the OP in this thread? His pistol is short-stroking. Why? The answer is simple: Because the compensator is bleeding off too much recoil energy; and the ammunition is too weak. There are hundreds - if not thousands - of Glock pistol owners on this site whose Glocks are far from stock and run, 'like a Swiss Rolex' - I'm one of them; and I've been using Glock pistols with muzzle-ported barrels in them for nearly ten years, now. Never a problem! (With the barrels)
Straight from the factory, numerous Glock pistols are FAR from perfect and need plenty of tweaking. An example would be all of the problems Glock pistols have recently had with their extractors and ejectors. Some of the analysis done by several board members, here, approached, 'Sherlock Holmes status' in the quality and accuracy of their investigations. (They should have been paid!)
__________________
'Wisdom To One Is Foolishness To Another; But, Alas, A Fool Knows Not The Difference; And, The Road To Hell? ...... It Remains Well Trod By Those Who Should Know Better.'
Last edited by Arc Angel; 04-03-2012 at 04:13..
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 05:23
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bessemer, AL
Posts: 1,624
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sam colt
Go to Lone wolf's web site they will tell you why.
|
It does not say DON'T use 115 gr 9mm. It says you MAY have problems with crappy 115 gr 9mm ammo.
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 07:25
|
#21
|
|
CLM Number 185
Federal Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Beaumont,Texas
Posts: 25,081
|
Only 1 percent of LW barrels don't do very well with 115 grain ammo.
In fact in actually states, " This rare failure is too low a percentage to make an issue".
__________________
"Some People Are Like Slinkies. They're Not Really Good For Anything, But They Bring a Smile To Your Face When Pushed Down The Stairs."
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 08:19
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: carthage NC
Posts: 212
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glockdude1
Only 1 percent of LW barrels don't do very well with 115 grain ammo.
In fact in actually states, " This rare failure is too low a percentage to make an issue".

|
but it obvious your in that one percent change to stock or change pin shoot better ammo .
__________________
G23 40 cal S&W , Taurus PT 92 9mm ,savage 110 7 rem mag .GSSF and Lifetime NRA, NC concealed carry Instructor, NRA Pistol Instructor
please excuse my spelling and grammar, worked all my life so that’s not my strong area Thanks
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24.
|
|
|