Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
|
10-01-2011, 14:10
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
Ruger SR1911 - MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENT
Well, I took the Ruger SR1911 out to the range today, and shot it for the first time, putting it through its paces. What a major disappointment.
I've been reading here from "experts" that this thing is bound to be a piece of junk, sure to fail, go bad, do something wrong, or be wildly inaccurate, in other words, surely, Ruger's first attempt at a 1911 will be a bad one, or one only half-way well done.
It performed flawlessly, through over 400 rounds, not a single misfeed, FTF, or FTE. Nothing, and I tried my best to get it to stutter and cough. It would not hear of it. Unlike my Springfield Loaded through its first few hundred rounds, the Ruger SR1911 had not a single issue.
I stripped one off the mag and had one in the chamber and shoved the magazine back in fully loaded...perfect performance. I used four different magazines with it, Ruger's own 8 and 7 rounder, that it came with, some relative inexpensive Kimbers, a bunch of Kimber Pro-Tac and one Wilson ten round magazine. Again, I was disappointed that it performed flawlessly with each magazine. I shot it as fast as I could through four magazines in a row, one right after the other...flawless.
Sure, however, I thought...using the least expensive crappy ammo I could find would be its undoing. I just knew the "experts" had to be right. But, again, disappointment. Shooting the cheapest FMJ brass ammo I could find, from some Hungary or Czechoslovakia company...400 rounds, no problems.
I was so disappointed, I have posted a series of range reports showing you how it failed to live up to the negative predictions of experts.
At 25 feet, from a bench rest, I shot a one inch group, at 25 yards, put them into about a two inch group and at 50 yards, I got most of the shots in the black on the bulls-eye target.
How can I trust the "experts" who predicted my Ruger SR1911 would be so bad?
Here are the videos:
Part One
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=funnWctU7hw&hd=1
Part Two
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5w0fxKIhNJQ&hd=1
Part Three
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7OTd-pCk08&hd=1
Part Four
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0-xEtPYbJA&hd=1
Part Five
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPrrsbpcmmg&hd=1
Part Six
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSe2xW8mzj4&hd=1
Part Seven
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6tH9yIeY-4&hd=1
Last edited by ptmccain; 10-02-2011 at 17:07..
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:26
|
#2
|
|
CLM Number 2129
GT Mayor
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Muskogee Ok.
Posts: 129,483
|
I think that you should just send me the pistol and be done with it then, my friend
__________________
Don't dial 911, dial 1911
If you don't stand behind our troops, PLEASE feel free to stand in front of them!
Sethsgunleather.com When it HAS to be the best!
Schiit audio, everything else ain't.
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
10-01-2011, 14:29
|
#3
|
|
CLM Number 281
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Posts: 28,067
|
What "experts" have stated the Ruger was destined to be a POS?
Last edited by faawrenchbndr; 10-01-2011 at 14:33..
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:29
|
#4
|
|
2A RKBA 4EVER
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: here and there...
Posts: 10,759
|
Get in line Okie... right behind me!
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:31
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 4,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptmccain
Well, I took the Ruger SR1911 out to the range today, and shot it for the first time, putting it through its paces. What a major disappointment.
I've been reading here from "experts" that this thing is bound to be a piece of junk, sure to fail, go bad, do something wrong, or be wildly inaccurate, in other words, surely, Ruger's first attempt at a 1911 will be a bad one, or one only half-way well done.
It performed flawlessly, through over 400 rounds, not a single misfeed, FTF, or FTE. Nothing, and I tried my best to get it to stutter and cough. It would not hear of it. Unlike my Springfield Loaded through its first few hundred rounds, the Ruger SR1911 had not a single issue.
I stripped one off the mag and had one in the chamber and shoved the magazine back in fully loaded...perfect performance. I used four different magazines with it, Ruger's own 8 and 7 rounder, that it came with, some relative inexpensive Kimbers, a bunch of Kimber Pro-Tac and one Wilson ten round magazine. Again, I was disappointed that it performed flawlessly with each magazine. I shot it as fast as I could through four magazines in a row, one right after the other...flawless.
Sure, however, I thought...using the least expensive crappy ammo I could find would be its undoing. I just knew the "experts" had to be right. But, again, disappointment. Shooting the cheapest FMJ brass ammo I could find, from some Hungary or Czechoslovakia company...400 rounds, no problems.
I was so disappointed, I have posted a series of range reports showing you how it failed to live up to the negative predictions of experts.
At 25 feet, from a bench rest, I shot a one inch group, at 25 yards, put them into about a two inch group and at 50 yards, I got most of the shots in the black on the bulls-eye target.
How can I trust the "experts" who predicted my Ruger SR1911 would be so bad?
You can see for yourself....
Ruger SR1911 Range Report Part 1
Ruger SR1911 Range Report Part 2
Ruger SR1911 Range Report Part 3
Ruger SR1911 Range Report Part 4
|
Signed,
Bill Ruger Jr.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:31
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
I know...I feel like throwing it away. I was crushed that, as predicted by the joker ripping Ruger here, it would simply come to pieces after the first magazine or so.
Didn't happen.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:32
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Jersey Republik
Posts: 12,086
|
That is some good one handed shooting.
Congrats on your new Ruger.
__________________
"...the men under your command deserve your leadership."-OXCOPS
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:32
|
#8
|
|
Rent this space
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 10,684
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amsdorf
I've been reading around on the Internet from "experts" that this thing is bound to be a piece of junk, sure to fail, go bad, do something wrong, or be wildly inaccurate, in other words, surely, Ruger's first attempt at a 1911 will be a bad one, or one only half-way well done.
How can I trust the "experts" who predicted my Ruger SR1911 would be so bad?
:pop2:
|
You must be confused if you are referring to the thread, which was that a Springfield mil-spec was a preferred base gun for a custom build by top smiths.
I don't recall anyone saying that the Ruger was a POS.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:35
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by faawrenchbndr
What "experts" have stated the Ruger was destined to be a POS?
This seems like a bit of a troll thread to me. 
|
See the word expert in quotes, as in, "experts."
It was sarcasm, my friend.
I was poking Fenor in the ribs a bit and trying to offer a range report that was slightly less boring than most.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:36
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
It was sarcasm, see post above.
But so that there will be NO mistaking my message:
I am thrilled beyond words with the Ruger SR1911. I'm about ready to put my Springfield Loaded up for sale. It's been back to the factory once, and has had to get a part replaced, in less than a year. And it gave me grief for the first several hundred rounds.
The Ruger SR1911 was extremely accurate right out of the box.
I love it. I heart it. I've become a Ruger SR1911 Fanboy.
Need I say more?
 !!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quack
You must be confused if you are referring to the thread, which was that a Springfield mil-spec was a preferred base gun for a custom build by top smiths.
I don't recall anyone saying that the Ruger was a POS.
|
Last edited by ptmccain; 10-01-2011 at 14:47..
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 14:49
|
#11
|
|
CLM Number 281
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Posts: 28,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptmccain
See the word expert in quotes, as in, "experts."
It was sarcasm, my friend.
I was poking Fenor in the ribs a bit and trying to offer a range report that was slightly less boring than most.

|
Was referring to the "Rugers are destined to be failures" thread as the
troll thread not this one.
Apologies,.......I edited that part out,but was a bit late.
I sure hope Ruger steps up production and offers an ALL stainless model
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 15:03
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
oh< whoops
Last edited by ptmccain; 10-01-2011 at 15:07..
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 15:04
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
Oh, well don't I feel like the arse now.
: )
I'm sorry to be gushing on here, but I'm blown away by this thing. Elsewhere, Walt Kuleck told me: "When I first picked up the SR1911 I was in love. The feel, the feel...it's perfect.
I sold my SW1911s and bought another SR1911!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by faawrenchbndr
Was referring to the "Rugers are destined to be failures" thread as the
troll thread not this one.
Apologies,.......I edited that part out,but was a bit late.
I sure hope Ruger steps up production and offers an ALL stainless model
|
Last edited by ptmccain; 10-01-2011 at 15:06..
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 15:17
|
#14
|
|
CLM Number 281
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Posts: 28,067
|
No harm , no foul! It's all good!
Darn it if you aren't one of the lucky ones,.....I've yet to ever see one first hand.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 15:18
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 412
|
Sorry to hear about your disappointing experience.
I plan on picking one up as soon as I can find one just to see how disappointing they truly are.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 16:48
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 78,557
|
Cool
Glad you like your new SR1911. I love mine as well.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 16:58
|
#17
|
|
.45 fanatic
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,075
|
Did you save the box, to send it back to Ruger when they issue the recall ?
 ........Congrats my friend.Nice looking pistol.
__________________
BIG BORE FAN
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 17:01
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
Oh, definitely. I'm good to go. I know it will utterly fall apart at the 600th round I put down the pipe.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 17:02
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wishoot
Sorry to hear about your disappointing experience.
I plan on picking one up as soon as I can find one just to see how disappointing they truly are.
|
I can only hope you are as disappointed as I was this morning.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 17:31
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bac1023
Cool
Glad you like your new SR1911. I love mine as well.
|
Glad to hear it, thanks, bro.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 17:32
|
#21
|
|
Silver Membership
INFRINGED!
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Mivonks, MI
Posts: 40,560
|
Quote:
|
I've been reading here from "experts" that this thing is bound to be a piece of junk, sure to fail, go bad, do something wrong, or be wildly inaccurate, in other words, surely, Ruger's first attempt at a 1911 will be a bad one, or one only half-way well done.
|
I don't know where you were reading about that.
Every article I have seen where the Ruger is mentioned, has been favorable.
__________________
An enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty.
Alexander Hamilton, author of Federalist No. 1. 10/27/1787
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 17:39
|
#22
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Saint Louis, Missouri
Posts: 470
|
Note to Jason:
Might be a good idea to read a comment stream before kicking in your .
.02
FWIW.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason D
I don't know where you were reading about that.
Every article I have seen where the Ruger is mentioned, has been favorable.
|
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 18:22
|
#23
|
|
CLM Number 281
NRA Life Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Posts: 28,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason D
I don't know where you were reading about that.
Every article I have seen where the Ruger is mentioned, has been favorable.
|
Start at the top and read all posts,.........they explain all
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 18:38
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 367
|
I will definitely be checking out the SR1911 if and when they show up in my area. It will be interesting to see what Rugers next 1911 will be.
|
|
|
10-01-2011, 20:34
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,260
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by faawrenchbndr
Start at the top and read all posts,.........they explain all
|
That's just crazy talk!
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32.
|
|
|