GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-15-2010, 20:59   #1
themighty9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 3,084
WST or WSF for 9mm 124gr jhp

Ok I may try one last powder before I stick with something solid. I tried tightgroup, and so far have loved the results, using 4.0gr TG over a 124gr MG JHP out of a beretta 92fs. Dont remember which most prefer for the same bullet WSTor WSF. Not much load data for WST, WSF seems pretty common. So wich should I try? I think I wanna try WST but dont know any data for it. BTW the press I'm running is a dillon 550 if that matters

Last edited by themighty9mm; 07-15-2010 at 20:59..
themighty9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:15   #2
Wash-ar15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,837
I loaded 1k of 124gr Pd fmj with 5 gr wst and this load is very accurate and cycles well. usually,I don't load this many of 1 load,but this one make me very happy.
Wash-ar15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:28   #3
themighty9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 3,084
I myself just wanna stick with 1. I'm really new, I have loaded a grand total of 1200 rounds. Tried unique, doesnt measur well with my 550, switched to TG like it alot, no real complains other than its hard to see inside the case. Wanna try WST (I think) as these 2 powders (again I think wst ccould be wsf thus the reason for this thread) people seem to be really happy with. I would try solo but dont have a chrono so its kinda out. I have no qualms playing around with thing, but mostly just wanna find as load or 2 I am happy or even better thrilled with. So far TG is most excellent for me but I wanna see if I can get the same or better result minus the 1 quaral I have with it
themighty9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:33   #4
Wash-ar15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,837
the only time i have used TG is with a 147gr plated and the accuracy was very dissappointing.

I use WSF mainly for lead loads as I have found it smokes less than using the hotter stuff.
Wash-ar15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:37   #5
IndyGunFreak
KO Windows
 
IndyGunFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 30,141
Send a message via ICQ to IndyGunFreak Send a message via AIM to IndyGunFreak Send a message via MSN to IndyGunFreak Send a message via Yahoo to IndyGunFreak Send a message via Skype™ to IndyGunFreak


Quote:
Originally Posted by themighty9mm View Post
I myself just wanna stick with 1. I'm really new, I have loaded a grand total of 1200 rounds. Tried unique, doesnt measur well with my 550, switched to TG like it alot, no real complains other than its hard to see inside the case. Wanna try WST (I think) as these 2 powders (again I think wst ccould be wsf thus the reason for this thread) people seem to be really happy with. I would try solo but dont have a chrono so its kinda out. I have no qualms playing around with thing, but mostly just wanna find as load or 2 I am happy or even better thrilled with. So far TG is most excellent for me but I wanna see if I can get the same or better result minus the 1 quaral I have with it
Fred(i think) has posted a lot of WST data here...
__________________
Quote:
Ronald Reagan
"If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under."
"Man is not free unless Government is limited"
IndyGunFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:38   #6
themighty9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 3,084
Giben I was only shooting at 7 and 15 yards but at 7 yards I was putting bullet on top of bullet using TG, at 15 yards I was keeping them well inside 4 inches and I'm not a great shot by most accounts. I was satisified. Just wanna try 1 more good powder and see the results
themighty9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:58   #7
Bultx1215
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bulverde Tx
Posts: 261
I went with WST in all my 9mm weights and its great!. I worked them up per Fred's suggestions and a few others and they were perfect. Nice and soft like TG, but the brass is clean and cool.
Bultx1215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 00:35   #8
tjpet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Utah-Idaho border
Posts: 5,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by themighty9mm View Post
Ok I may try one last powder before I stick with something solid. I tried tightgroup, and so far have loved the results, using 4.0gr TG over a 124gr MG JHP out of a beretta 92fs. Dont remember which most prefer for the same bullet WSTor WSF. Not much load data for WST, WSF seems pretty common. So wich should I try? I think I wanna try WST but dont know any data for it. BTW the press I'm running is a dillon 550 if that matters

4.5-5.0grns. WST w/124grn. bullet.

I use 5.0grns. myself for 115/124s. This falls somewhere between 1150-1180fps depending on barrel length. Excellent accuracy, clean burning, and low recoiling the fact that WST meters extremely well is just frosting on the cake.

I only use WSF in the 9mm for +P loads. If you ever go that route try 6.2grns. w/124 JHPs. Good for 1250fps, give or take, and is the most accurate hot 9mm reload I've seen in 40 years of rolling my own.
tjpet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 04:42   #9
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,616
4.1 gr of wsf behind 124gr mg is a nice shooting round with lots of room to go hotter if you chose to. But absolutely no reason to.
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 05:18   #10
ScEd
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UpState SC
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunred View Post
4.1 gr of wsf behind 124gr mg is a nice shooting round with lots of room to go hotter if you chose to. But absolutely no reason to.
I'm with SGR, 5.0gr of WSF behind a 124gr XTP in my CZ75BD is the best shooting load I have ever shot in a 9MM.

Last edited by ScEd; 07-16-2010 at 05:19..
ScEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 07:53   #11
BadAndy
Senior Member
 
BadAndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjpet View Post
I only use WSF in the 9mm for +P loads. If you ever go that route try 6.2grns. w/124 JHPs. Good for 1250fps, give or take, and is the most accurate hot 9mm reload I've seen in 40 years of rolling my own.
I load 6.2gr of WSF behind 124gr Gold Dots and they're right at about 1250 out of my M&P. I really like that load and also carry it in my Kahr CW9.
BadAndy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 11:20   #12
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,651
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunred View Post
4.1 gr of wsf behind 124gr mg is a nice shooting round with lots of room to go hotter if you chose to. But absolutely no reason to.
You chrono those? I can't imagine they are even breaking 1000fps.
TJ's 4.9gr-5gr of WST under a 124grFMJ or JHP will run about 1100fps, depending on OAL. That is pretty much max IMO, so if you want a little more gas, then WSF is the powder. As BA noted, 6.1-6.2gr will get you into +P range w/ 1250fps. I'm am not a fan of WST w/ 147gr bullets, just don't get the accuracy I want, so if Iwanted one powder to run full power to +P, it would be WSF. WST for light to full power loads, especially w/ lighter bullets.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 07-16-2010 at 11:21..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 11:33   #13
themighty9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 3,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
You chrono those? I can't imagine they are even breaking 1000fps.
TJ's 4.9gr-5gr of WST under a 124grFMJ or JHP will run about 1100fps, depending on OAL. That is pretty much max IMO, so if you want a little more gas, then WSF is the powder. As BA noted, 6.1-6.2gr will get you into +P range w/ 1250fps. I'm am not a fan of WST w/ 147gr bullets, just don't get the accuracy I want, so if Iwanted one powder to run full power to +P, it would be WSF. WST for light to full power loads, especially w/ lighter bullets.
You seem to be the wst/wsf guy. So for my load what would you recomend? You know of a source for load data with wst with 124gr jhp? WSF is on the website but no wst
themighty9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 11:44   #14
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,651
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by themighty9mm View Post
You seem to be the wst/wsf guy. So for my load what would you recomend? You know of a source for load data with wst with 124gr jhp? WSF is on the website but no wst
TJ shoots as much WST as I do, his loading recommendations mimic mine. There are some older Winchester loading flyers around that have WST data for the 9mm. I no longer have one, but you should find something you can work with using 4.8gr-5.1gr under a 124grJHP/FMJ, go as long an OAL that will fit your gun.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2010, 23:47   #15
tjpet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Utah-Idaho border
Posts: 5,255
My 115/124grn. 9mm loads w/WST are taken directly from the 4th edition Hornady manual. Why they discontinued the data down the road I can't say.

Fred, I run 147grn. bullets w/3.8grns. WST. Good for approximately 940fps through a 4-5" barrel with pretty good accuracy, especially from my BHP. Came up with this one using a Powley powder computor from years past. OAL is 1.150".
tjpet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 00:33   #16
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
You chrono those? I can't imagine they are even breaking 1000fps.
TJ's 4.9gr-5gr of WST under a 124grFMJ or JHP will run about 1100fps, depending on OAL. That is pretty much max IMO, so if you want a little more gas, then WSF is the powder. As BA noted, 6.1-6.2gr will get you into +P range w/ 1250fps. I'm am not a fan of WST w/ 147gr bullets, just don't get the accuracy I want, so if Iwanted one powder to run full power to +P, it would be WSF. WST for light to full power loads, especially w/ lighter bullets.
Yea I have several times. I don't remember off hand but it just limps past power factor for IDPA. It is the most used load at my IDPA club. Its just a putting holes in paper load. We are shooting at sea level if that makes any difference. I don't have my own crono so I only crono a couple times a year.
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 09:02   #17
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,651
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunred View Post
Yea I have several times. I don't remember off hand but it just limps past power factor for IDPA. It is the most used load at my IDPA club. Its just a putting holes in paper load. We are shooting at sea level if that makes any difference. I don't have my own crono so I only crono a couple times a year.
Wow, I would double check your data, my own chrono & Hogdon's don't even get close (I assume you think you are getting 1050fps?):
124 GR. FMJ Winchester WSF .355" 1.169" 4.7 1015 27,700 PSI 5.3 1115 32,700 PSI
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 07-18-2010 at 09:04..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 19:40   #18
EMazing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NE Pennsylvania
Posts: 9
5.0grs of WST behind Berry's 124gr FP with an OAL 1.150" is all I shoot through my Glock 19. Very accurate round.
EMazing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 22:02   #19
8Ring
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 486
I've used a lot of WSF with 115 gr. and 124gr Montana Gold FMJ loads and found it to be consistent and accurate. It also meters very well.

My recipe was 4.9gr with the 124gr Montana Gold FMJ that averaged around 1075 fps through my CZ. This easily made USPSA power factor and was well below published maximums.

You may need to increase the charge by .1 or .2 grains due to the fact that the FMJ loads have a somewhat longer bearing surface.

I've been reluctant to use WST in 9mm loads due to lack of published information. I just don't like to estimate outcomes with a high pressure round like the 9mm.

It's also interesting that WST and WSF are fairly far apart on the burn-rate tables yet the charges for 9mm loads are almost identical. This makes my think that the same charge of WST would yield much higher pressure than an equivalent load of WSF.

Chris
8Ring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2010, 08:56   #20
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 375
I have not seen WST recommended by W-W for use in 9mm. I have used 5.0 gr. WSF behind either the 125 gr. Star JSP or 124 gr. Montana Gold JHP wirth excellent results. I also use WSF for the 147 gr. jacketed bullets.
TonyT is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply


Tags
9mm, wsf wst
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:28.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,398
354 Members
1,044 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 16:42