Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2013, 12:40   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 779
Striker spring question...

So i always take out the standard springs (striker 5Lb,trigger 5Lb standard safety spring) in my glock and put a 6Lb striker spring,6Lb trigger spring and a reduced safety spring...

Question... Has anybody used the 4Lb striker spring instead? Makes the trigger noticeably lighter... But was told not a good CCW option cause it can cause light primer strikes... And i should stick with how my setup is...
MSims is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 13:21   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,076
I have used the lighter striker spring in the past and it did lighten the trigger pull but I did have a couple of mis fires due to light primer strikes. I have heard that getting a lighter striker will help with this, but I haven't tried it. I went back to the stock spring and a - (3.5) connector.
gooffeyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 14:03   #3
NRA Member
bentbiker's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,553
Standard striker spring is 5.5, not 5.0. Unless you have (or reload) ammo with extremely hard primers, there's no need to increase your trigger pull by installing a still heavier striker spring. You don't identify the gun, but possible exceptions might be the .45 and 10mm because of a heavier striker; no experience with those but I understand some use the extra power 6# striker spring with those models.

Combining the 6# trigger spring with the very weak 4# striker spring can result in the trigger failing to come all the way forward. However, you need not reduce the striker spring all the way from 5.5# to 4.0# to get a reduced trigger pull. There are 4.5# and 5.0# springs, and either of these springs should be sufficient to ignite the primers of most ammo (especially SD ammo) AND reset the trigger all the way forward. If you want additional margin against light strikes, a lightweight striker like the Jager can provide it.

Last edited by bentbiker; 02-09-2013 at 14:25..
bentbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 14:13   #4
Senior Member
G-34's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 885
never had a prob with the 4 lb striker spring
"I'm back and ready to do battle with the dark forces that infest this forum." - JBnTX

"There is nothing so terrible as ignorance in motion.."
G-34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 14:15   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 591
I have a lighter striker spring from Glock Worx in a few of my 9mm and 40, never had a problem yet, but I usually use Federal Primers and they are softer. I keep my ccw stock with the exception of the conector.
man.cave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 18:16   #6
Platinum Membership
robhic's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,472
Early on I tried a 4# striker spring. It makes a significant difference in pull weight. Probably the biggest of all changes, IMO. But why? I couldn't really answer that, went back to stock 5# spring and never looked back.

I DID end up with the NY1 spring and 3.5 GLOCK connector and like this combo. Tried Ghost but I like the Glock and Sherer connectors better.
-- Robert --
NRA Patron Member
"Giving Money and Power to Government is Like Giving Whiskey and Car Keys to Teenage Boys" - PJ O'Rourke

Obama doesn’t simply lie. He exists in a truth-free zone.
robhic is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 23:27.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 735
184 Members
551 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03