GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2013, 21:39   #1
halfmoonclip
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,297
Using magnum primers in non-magnum loads

The title says most of it.
A buddy is trying to get back in reloading after a ten year hiatus, and tried to buy some primers in the midst of all the current craziness.
All he could find in Large Pistol primers were Magnums.
He wants to use these primers primarily for .45 ACP reloads, especially with Bullseye or W231.
Soooo, how much of a problem does this actually create? I recall reading that magnum primers have a longer/hotter burn to ignite larger powder charges.
Should he adjust his loads because of these primers, or is case density still important (especially with the issue of 'detonation', which may or may not exist).
What says the group?
Thanks,
Moon
halfmoonclip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 23:51   #2
Taterhead
Counting Beans
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 3,086
They should be fine. The usual practices apply: begin at starting charges, or a tenth or two less, and work up carefully until you find what the gun likes.
__________________
Away from Glocktalk for a bit.
Taterhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 00:43   #3
judgecrater
Senior Member
 
judgecrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 161
I have been substituting mag for regular in 45ACP. No problems. I called Federal to get their opinion. They said no problem regarding pressure, just that the cups are a little harder and may cause light strikes in some guns.
If they work in your gun, you are good to go.
judgecrater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 01:02   #4
AF-Odin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 397
Haven't tried them in .45, but during the last crazyness, had the same issue with SPP that I could only get in "magnum." Worked well in .38 and 9mm. Like others said, new components, back off a bit and work up. End result was that when I got back to normal powder charges with the magnum primers, I did not notice any difference between regular and magnum SPP.
__________________
AF-Odin
USAF (Ret)
AF-Odin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 04:14   #5
Three-Five-Seven
Señor Mombo
 
Three-Five-Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Tucson
Posts: 3,345
Actually, with old fashioned powders like Bullseye, the magnum primer may prove to provide better, and more consistent performance in the Winter time.
__________________
That I could be wrong is an eventuality that has not escaped me. I just painted the pictures as I saw them. I do not know how to do anything else. (Saint Elmer, 1955)
Three-Five-Seven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 07:50   #6
halfmoonclip
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,297
Thanks, guys. Seems to reinforce what a local shooter told me, but it's good to hear that it's not an issue.
They may be CCI primers, which have uncommonly hard battery cups to begin with (I could get an N-frame to misfire with a full strength mainspring by pointing it straight up and firing), so I hope that isn't an issue. Hate when the gummint starts these balls rolling, and then everyone panics.
Moon
halfmoonclip is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:34.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 557
128 Members
429 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31