GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-24-2012, 18:41   #1
4Rules
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,658
Halifax firearm case goes to Supreme Court of Canada

The case of a man charged with crimes after he opened his Halifax condominium door to police while holding a loaded 9mm Beretta handgun is headed to Canada’s top court...Erin Lee MacDonald, in his early 40s, had originally received a mandatory minimum sentence of three years in jail on the charge...
http://thechronicleherald.ca/novascotia/191386-halifax-firearm-case-goes-to-top-court
4Rules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 20:16   #2
4Rules
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,658
Erin Lee MacDonald, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen, et al.

SCC Case Information
Summary
34914

http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/case-dossier/cms-sgd/sum-som-eng.aspx?cas=34914

Quote:
Cases

SCC Case Information

Summary

34914

Erin Lee MacDonald, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen, et al.

(Nova Scotia) (Criminal) (As of Right / By Leave)
Keywords

Criminal law.
Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch) for information purposes only.


Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Criminal law Search and seizure Whether the appellant’s s. 8 Charter rights were violated Whether the Court of Appeal erred in making findings of fact not supported by the evidence nor consistent with the findings of fact made by the trial judge.

The appellant, Mr. MacDonald, was convicted of careless handling of a firearm, possession of a weapon for a purpose dangerous to the public peace and possession without authorization of a loaded restricted firearm, contrary to ss. 86, 88 and 95 of the Criminal Code respectively. At trial, the judge essentially accepted the scenario presented by the Crown according to which a rude and intoxicated Mr. MacDonald, while entertaining some friends at his condo in downtown Halifax, was politely and repeatedly asked to turn down the volume of his music, only to finally respond to police at the door by opening it while carrying a loaded restricted firearm. A police struggle over the weapon ensued. On appeal, Mr. MacDonald argued, among other things, that the police conduct that evening constituted an unlawful search contrary to s. 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and that the trial judge erred in concluding that the police action was justified in the interests of officer safety. The majority of the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, but dismissed the ground of appeal relating to unlawful search and seizure. Beveridge J.A., dissenting, would have allowed the appeal, quashed the convictions and directed acquittals on all charges. In his view, the police conduct constituted a very serious breach of Mr. MacDonald’s rights and, despite the reliability of the evidence obtained and the state’s interest in a trial on the merits, the admission of the evidence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

Date Modified: 2012-04-12
4Rules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 19:22   #3
4Rules
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,658
SCC Case Information

Docket

34914

Erin Lee MacDonald, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen, et al.

http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/case-dossie...aspx?cas=34914
4Rules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2014, 09:58   #4
4Rules
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,658
Supreme Court rules gun owners face penalties for ignorance of law

The Supreme Court of Canada issued a 4-3 decision Friday upholding Erin Lee MacDonald's careless use and dangerous weapon convictions, but also restoring his unlawful possession conviction. The court denied MacDonald a "defence of ignorance of the law" on the unlawful possession charge, and ordered the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal to examine whether the three-year mandatory minimum sentence was constitutional.
http://www.torontosun.com/2014/01/17/supreme-court-rules-gun-owners-face-penalties-for-ignorance-of-law
4Rules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2014, 22:41   #5
4Rules
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,658
SCOC backs Halifax police in door-pushing case

The court disagreed that Erin Lee MacDonald had been subject to unreasonable search when, in December 2009, police responded to a noise complaint at his condominium at Bishop’s Landing. MacDonald opened his door partway to police, but an officer pushed it open further to get a look at what he was holding behind his leg, according to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal decision in the case.
Once police realized it was a gun, they rushed inside and subdued MacDonald. He was later convicted on a charge of unauthorized possession of a loaded, restricted firearm, careless use of a firearm and possessing a weapon for a dangerous purpose.
http://thechronicleherald.ca/metro/1181009-court-backs-halifax-police-in-door-pushing-case
4Rules is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 790
237 Members
553 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42