GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-15-2010, 20:59   #1
themighty9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 3,084
WST or WSF for 9mm 124gr jhp

Ok I may try one last powder before I stick with something solid. I tried tightgroup, and so far have loved the results, using 4.0gr TG over a 124gr MG JHP out of a beretta 92fs. Dont remember which most prefer for the same bullet WSTor WSF. Not much load data for WST, WSF seems pretty common. So wich should I try? I think I wanna try WST but dont know any data for it. BTW the press I'm running is a dillon 550 if that matters

Last edited by themighty9mm; 07-15-2010 at 20:59..
themighty9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:15   #2
Wash-ar15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,837
I loaded 1k of 124gr Pd fmj with 5 gr wst and this load is very accurate and cycles well. usually,I don't load this many of 1 load,but this one make me very happy.
Wash-ar15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:28   #3
themighty9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 3,084
I myself just wanna stick with 1. I'm really new, I have loaded a grand total of 1200 rounds. Tried unique, doesnt measur well with my 550, switched to TG like it alot, no real complains other than its hard to see inside the case. Wanna try WST (I think) as these 2 powders (again I think wst ccould be wsf thus the reason for this thread) people seem to be really happy with. I would try solo but dont have a chrono so its kinda out. I have no qualms playing around with thing, but mostly just wanna find as load or 2 I am happy or even better thrilled with. So far TG is most excellent for me but I wanna see if I can get the same or better result minus the 1 quaral I have with it
themighty9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:33   #4
Wash-ar15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,837
the only time i have used TG is with a 147gr plated and the accuracy was very dissappointing.

I use WSF mainly for lead loads as I have found it smokes less than using the hotter stuff.
Wash-ar15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:38   #5
themighty9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 3,084
Giben I was only shooting at 7 and 15 yards but at 7 yards I was putting bullet on top of bullet using TG, at 15 yards I was keeping them well inside 4 inches and I'm not a great shot by most accounts. I was satisified. Just wanna try 1 more good powder and see the results
themighty9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:58   #6
Bultx1215
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bulverde Tx
Posts: 261
I went with WST in all my 9mm weights and its great!. I worked them up per Fred's suggestions and a few others and they were perfect. Nice and soft like TG, but the brass is clean and cool.
Bultx1215 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 21:37   #7
IndyGunFreak
KO Windows
 
IndyGunFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 30,366
Send a message via ICQ to IndyGunFreak Send a message via AIM to IndyGunFreak Send a message via MSN to IndyGunFreak Send a message via Yahoo to IndyGunFreak Send a message via Skype™ to IndyGunFreak


Quote:
Originally Posted by themighty9mm View Post
I myself just wanna stick with 1. I'm really new, I have loaded a grand total of 1200 rounds. Tried unique, doesnt measur well with my 550, switched to TG like it alot, no real complains other than its hard to see inside the case. Wanna try WST (I think) as these 2 powders (again I think wst ccould be wsf thus the reason for this thread) people seem to be really happy with. I would try solo but dont have a chrono so its kinda out. I have no qualms playing around with thing, but mostly just wanna find as load or 2 I am happy or even better thrilled with. So far TG is most excellent for me but I wanna see if I can get the same or better result minus the 1 quaral I have with it
Fred(i think) has posted a lot of WST data here...
__________________
Quote:
Ronald Reagan
"If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under."
"Man is not free unless Government is limited"
IndyGunFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 17:38   #8
tac_driver
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 74
Quote:
Tried unique, doesnt measur well with my 550,
http://www.uniquetek.com/site/696296/product/T1278

I wasn't happy about how Unique metered in my 550B either until i tried this product. You got to have patience to install it but it was well worth it.
__________________
Dillon 550B, Lee LCT
Glock 19 9MM, S&W 640 .357, Ruger 10/22 .22 rifle
Colt 1911 Govt. Combat 45 ACP, Browning Buckmark .22 auto pistol
tac_driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 20:03   #9
MinervaDoe
Senior Member
 
MinervaDoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Way out in left field
Posts: 7,026
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by themighty9mm View Post
Tried unique, doesnt measure well with my 550,
Unique was giving me fits in my 550B last spring. I filled the Powder Measure Tube up with Unique and then threw 600 rounds of 10mm and 300 rounds of .45 ACP and then I threw another 400 rounds of 9mm. I just kept filling the tube up as I used up the powder. By the time I was loading the last of my 9mm, I had tons of variance on the powder throws. I think the powder may have gotten compacted.

This weekend, I loaded up 500 rounds of my 9mm 115 grain load with Unique. I watched it pretty closely and it never varied even a 10th of a grain while I loaded 500 rounds.

I took care to make sure the powder did not get compacted.
  1. I made sure that I never had more than 1/2 inch of powder in the main well of the Powder Measure Tube (about 75 rounds worth).
  2. I let the powder get low enough on occassion so that the divider in the tube showed.
I still have the better part of a four pound canister of Unique, so I'm glad I was able to get it to meter well. If you're willing to experiment, and make frequent powder measurements, I think this might be worth trying. I'd be interested in seeing if this works for anybody else. Otherwise, I'll blame the usual culprits: sunspots and gremlins.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 signatures.

Last edited by MinervaDoe; 09-28-2010 at 20:04..
MinervaDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 00:35   #10
tjpet
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Utah-Idaho border
Posts: 5,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by themighty9mm View Post
Ok I may try one last powder before I stick with something solid. I tried tightgroup, and so far have loved the results, using 4.0gr TG over a 124gr MG JHP out of a beretta 92fs. Dont remember which most prefer for the same bullet WSTor WSF. Not much load data for WST, WSF seems pretty common. So wich should I try? I think I wanna try WST but dont know any data for it. BTW the press I'm running is a dillon 550 if that matters

4.5-5.0grns. WST w/124grn. bullet.

I use 5.0grns. myself for 115/124s. This falls somewhere between 1150-1180fps depending on barrel length. Excellent accuracy, clean burning, and low recoiling the fact that WST meters extremely well is just frosting on the cake.

I only use WSF in the 9mm for +P loads. If you ever go that route try 6.2grns. w/124 JHPs. Good for 1250fps, give or take, and is the most accurate hot 9mm reload I've seen in 40 years of rolling my own.
tjpet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 04:42   #11
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,619
4.1 gr of wsf behind 124gr mg is a nice shooting round with lots of room to go hotter if you chose to. But absolutely no reason to.
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 05:18   #12
ScEd
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UpState SC
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunred View Post
4.1 gr of wsf behind 124gr mg is a nice shooting round with lots of room to go hotter if you chose to. But absolutely no reason to.
I'm with SGR, 5.0gr of WSF behind a 124gr XTP in my CZ75BD is the best shooting load I have ever shot in a 9MM.

Last edited by ScEd; 07-16-2010 at 05:19..
ScEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 11:20   #13
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,857
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunred View Post
4.1 gr of wsf behind 124gr mg is a nice shooting round with lots of room to go hotter if you chose to. But absolutely no reason to.
You chrono those? I can't imagine they are even breaking 1000fps.
TJ's 4.9gr-5gr of WST under a 124grFMJ or JHP will run about 1100fps, depending on OAL. That is pretty much max IMO, so if you want a little more gas, then WSF is the powder. As BA noted, 6.1-6.2gr will get you into +P range w/ 1250fps. I'm am not a fan of WST w/ 147gr bullets, just don't get the accuracy I want, so if Iwanted one powder to run full power to +P, it would be WSF. WST for light to full power loads, especially w/ lighter bullets.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 07-16-2010 at 11:21..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 11:33   #14
themighty9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 3,084
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
You chrono those? I can't imagine they are even breaking 1000fps.
TJ's 4.9gr-5gr of WST under a 124grFMJ or JHP will run about 1100fps, depending on OAL. That is pretty much max IMO, so if you want a little more gas, then WSF is the powder. As BA noted, 6.1-6.2gr will get you into +P range w/ 1250fps. I'm am not a fan of WST w/ 147gr bullets, just don't get the accuracy I want, so if Iwanted one powder to run full power to +P, it would be WSF. WST for light to full power loads, especially w/ lighter bullets.
You seem to be the wst/wsf guy. So for my load what would you recomend? You know of a source for load data with wst with 124gr jhp? WSF is on the website but no wst
themighty9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 11:44   #15
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,857
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by themighty9mm View Post
You seem to be the wst/wsf guy. So for my load what would you recomend? You know of a source for load data with wst with 124gr jhp? WSF is on the website but no wst
TJ shoots as much WST as I do, his loading recommendations mimic mine. There are some older Winchester loading flyers around that have WST data for the 9mm. I no longer have one, but you should find something you can work with using 4.8gr-5.1gr under a 124grJHP/FMJ, go as long an OAL that will fit your gun.
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 00:33   #16
shotgunred
reloading nut
 
shotgunred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N W Washington
Posts: 7,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredj338 View Post
You chrono those? I can't imagine they are even breaking 1000fps.
TJ's 4.9gr-5gr of WST under a 124grFMJ or JHP will run about 1100fps, depending on OAL. That is pretty much max IMO, so if you want a little more gas, then WSF is the powder. As BA noted, 6.1-6.2gr will get you into +P range w/ 1250fps. I'm am not a fan of WST w/ 147gr bullets, just don't get the accuracy I want, so if Iwanted one powder to run full power to +P, it would be WSF. WST for light to full power loads, especially w/ lighter bullets.
Yea I have several times. I don't remember off hand but it just limps past power factor for IDPA. It is the most used load at my IDPA club. Its just a putting holes in paper load. We are shooting at sea level if that makes any difference. I don't have my own crono so I only crono a couple times a year.
__________________
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.
shotgunred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2010, 09:02   #17
fredj338
Senior Member
 
fredj338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: so.cal.
Posts: 21,857
Blog Entries: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotgunred View Post
Yea I have several times. I don't remember off hand but it just limps past power factor for IDPA. It is the most used load at my IDPA club. Its just a putting holes in paper load. We are shooting at sea level if that makes any difference. I don't have my own crono so I only crono a couple times a year.
Wow, I would double check your data, my own chrono & Hogdon's don't even get close (I assume you think you are getting 1050fps?):
124 GR. FMJ Winchester WSF .355" 1.169" 4.7 1015 27,700 PSI 5.3 1115 32,700 PSI
__________________
"Given adequate penetration, a larger diameter bullet will have an edge in wounding effectiveness. It will damage a blood vessel the smaller projectile barely misses. The larger permanent cavity may lead to faster blood loss. Although such an edge clearly exists, its significance cannot be quantified".

Last edited by fredj338; 07-18-2010 at 09:04..
fredj338 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 07:53   #18
BadAndy
Senior Member
 
BadAndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjpet View Post
I only use WSF in the 9mm for +P loads. If you ever go that route try 6.2grns. w/124 JHPs. Good for 1250fps, give or take, and is the most accurate hot 9mm reload I've seen in 40 years of rolling my own.
I load 6.2gr of WSF behind 124gr Gold Dots and they're right at about 1250 out of my M&P. I really like that load and also carry it in my Kahr CW9.
BadAndy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2010, 08:56   #19
TonyT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 375
I have not seen WST recommended by W-W for use in 9mm. I have used 5.0 gr. WSF behind either the 125 gr. Star JSP or 124 gr. Montana Gold JHP wirth excellent results. I also use WSF for the 147 gr. jacketed bullets.
TonyT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 10:05   #20
Bello
America/Italia
 
Bello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: East Coast
Posts: 2,206
some good 9 milli data here
__________________
-Rob-
Bello is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply


Tags
9mm, wsf wst
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 730
204 Members
526 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31