Originally Posted by AK_Stick
I don't see any ability to construe reasonable restriction to all out confiscation.
If I were ordered to do something to do something i thought illegal I would refuse until I could get clarification. If it were determined legal but something I found immoral, I would refuse, and initiate my chapter.
The caveat that I would say is sometimes you don't have the luxury of time to have something "clarified" if it is illegal.
But will you agree that illegal and immoral are not the same? Would you also agree that legal and moral are not the same?
Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire